Fox News, and pretty much every post in this thread, is wrong. $200,000 of earned income per year in absolutely no way makes one rich. Income is a flow of money; rich is an accumulation of wealth.
rich
adjective
1. having wealth or great possessions
wealth
noun
1. a great quantity or store of money, valuable possessions, property, or other riches
Think of yourself as a business, your income is the bottom line of your Statement of Earnings and your wealth (or richness) is the bottom line of your Balance Sheet (Shareholder's Equity). They measure two separate things, one a flow over time and the other a snapshot of an accumulation at a single, specific moment. You cannot refer to anyone as 'rich' or 'poor' by looking at how much they make.
In fact, I would love to illustrate this further by naming off some pretty famous rich people: Scottie Pippen ($120 mil), Evander Holyfield ($250 mil), Deuce McAllister ($70 mil), Sheryl Swoopes ($50 mil), Michael Vick ($130 mil), Mike Tyson ($400 mil). I took the liberty of listing each famous rich person's lifetime earnings after their name. The only problem with my list is that none of them are rich, they're all BROKE. Every single one of them is BANKRUPT. Clearly income is not the same as wealth (which is defined as a measure of being rich).
In fact, most truly rich people in the United States become rich on annual incomes of <$100,000 per year, or less than half of an income defined as "rich". How do they do that? They do that by realizing that being rich and building wealth is not done by playing good offense (having a high income), wealth is built by playing good defense (controlling your spending and saving).