• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Major Carriers Souring On iPhone; Apple Found Guilty Of Price Fixing

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It seems like every huge technology firm is doomed if you listen to forums. Apple, Microsoft, Google, Samsung, Nokia, Blackberry (actually those last two might be) all doomed by forum experts. 😀

The following "official" deathwatch threads exists...
RIMM: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2153159&highlight=deathwatch
Apple: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2260660&highlight=deathwatch
Netflix: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2322416&highlight=deathwatch
T-Mobile: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2146687&highlight=deathwatch
AMD : http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2276314&highlight=deathwatch
Barnes & Noble: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2217761&highlight=deathwatch

The following "unofficial" deathwatch(meaning the OP never titled it as such but it essentially is based on their posts and posting history) threads exists...
Samsung: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2329286
Microsoft: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2258910&highlight=deathwatch

I'm sure I missed one for Motorola, Nokia, and others.
 
There were always Apple haters who talked crap about Apple products, but we didn't hear 'Apple's down' every few months until after Steve Jobs died. So I was basically disagreeing that he said 'five years', because it's more like 'two years' 🙂
Are you kidding? People have been predicting Apple's imminent doom (for one completely wrong reason or another) since day one.
 
Are you kidding? People have been predicting Apple's imminent doom (for one completely wrong reason or another) since day one.

I guess I wasn't in the club then. Like I said, I was aware that there are a lot of people who always talked crap (haters gonna hate), but I didn't think they actually 'predicted' Apple's doom.
 
A net income of $6.87 billion? Uh-oh, that's significantly less than Samsung's net income.

Interesting how much the market has changed since late 2011 and early 2012. Back then Apple really ruled the profit war, now it seems it's pretty much even with Samsung... and it seems Samsung may be taking over the profit war this year.

Apple really needs to deliver well in the next iPhone to remain competitive. No more of this 4 inch clumsy elongated, thin design bs.
 
Last edited:
A net income of $6.87 billion? Uh-oh, that's significantly less than Samsung's net income.

Interesting how much the market has changed since late 2011 and early 2012. Back then Apple really ruled the profit war, now it seems it's pretty much even with Samsung... and it seems Samsung may be taking over the profit war this year.

Apple really needs to deliver well in the next iPhone to remain competitive. No more of this 4 inch clumsy elongated, thin design bs.

Does it matter which one is making the most? They are both doing far better than the rest of the market they are in.
They are probably the only two smartphone hardware manufacturers that are guaranteed to be around in a few more years.
 
There were always Apple haters who talked crap about Apple products, but we didn't hear 'Apple's down' every few months until after Steve Jobs died. So I was basically disagreeing that he said 'five years', because it's more like 'two years' 🙂
My older cousin is a die hard Apple fan and has only owned iPhones since the original. He blames all Apple's problems today on Timothy Cook commenting/lamenting that "If Steve Jobs was alive, he wouldn't have made the iPad mini", or that "Apple wouldn't have had this debacle with it's maps", or that "Apple would have remained at 3.5' screen size rather than trying to follow Android" and many other crazy comments that I have long since forgotten.

Steve Jobs never seem to get blame on anything within the past 5-7 years from him.
 
Does it matter which one is making the most? They are both doing far better than the rest of the market they are in.
They are probably the only two smartphone hardware manufacturers that are guaranteed to be around in a few more years.

Not really, just interesting because Apple was a huge money maker in 2011 and 2012.

Now Apple's share price dived and their profit share is declining everyday as we speak.

I'm more afraid that people will start buying supposedly "good looking" Chinese phones from Huawei and ZTE and then finding out they're buggy and useless. I really hope HTC, Nokia and LG stay in the smartphone race because they offer some interesting products.
 
Not really, just interesting because Apple was a huge money maker in 2011 and 2012.

Now Apple's share price dived and their profit share is declining everyday as we speak.

They are still making insane amounts of money in a market that most are struggling just to make a profit in.

I'm more afraid that people will start buying supposedly "good looking" Chinese phones from Huawei and ZTE and then finding out they're buggy and useless. I really hope HTC, Nokia and LG stay in the smartphone race because they offer some interesting products.

It'll be interesting to see if the "new" Chinese manufacturers do well in the west. I doubt that they will be significantly buggier than the traditional manufacturers. The internal hardware on phones is pretty standard and the Chinese have got a lot of experience at putting them together.
 
Does it matter which one is making the most? They are both doing far better than the rest of the market they are in.
They are probably the only two smartphone hardware manufacturers that are guaranteed to be around in a few more years.
Not really.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2329286
But based on Dari's post there, he claims that if Apple is in trouble then Samsung is in even more trouble than Apple is because their business is vertically integrated and has more risk.
That is of course is if you believe what he says. 😉
 
I'm impressed Apple and Samsung have avoided a race to the bottom, erasing profit margins. As the industry matures, I suspect this will be inevitable.
 
My older cousin is a die hard Apple fan and has only owned iPhones since the original. He blames all Apple's problems today on Timothy Cook commenting/lamenting that "If Steve Jobs was alive, he wouldn't have made the iPad mini", or that "Apple wouldn't have had this debacle with it's maps", or that "Apple would have remained at 3.5' screen size rather than trying to follow Android" and many other crazy comments that I have long since forgotten.

Steve Jobs never seem to get blame on anything within the past 5-7 years from him.

Precisely! This is exactly why I made that comment above. The 'doom' talk didn't really start until after Steve Jobs died :biggrin:
 
Not really.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2329286
But based on Dari's post there, he claims that if Apple is in trouble then Samsung is in even more trouble than Apple is because their business is vertically integrated and has more risk.

I'd argue that neither apple nor Samsung are in any trouble at all. It's a tough market and if it gets tougher then Apple and Samsung will come out stronger at the expense of the weaker firms. That's ignoring the wild cards of the new (to us) Chinese manufacturers. It could be that they will come out of it all on top. They certainly have the manufacturing expertise and a large home market.

That is of course is if you believe what he says. 😉

I don't. He tends to trim the facts to fit his bias a bit too much.
 
They are still making insane amounts of money in a market that most are struggling just to make a profit in.



It'll be interesting to see if the "new" Chinese manufacturers do well in the west. I doubt that they will be significantly buggier than the traditional manufacturers. The internal hardware on phones is pretty standard and the Chinese have got a lot of experience at putting them together.

The main problem for these Chinese phones will be the UI and developer support. Also they will face enormous difficulty with marketing since they are tiny compared to Apple and Samsung in terms of size and profits.

The Oppo Find 5 has decent specs but the UI is just ugly and hideous.
 
The main problem for these Chinese phones will be the UI and developer support. Also they will face enormous difficulty with marketing since they are tiny compared to Apple and Samsung in terms of size and profits.

The Oppo Find 5 has decent specs but the UI is just ugly and hideous.

The easiest solution for them would be to slap a stock build of android on them or an MIUI build.
 
Huawei and ZTE won't generate any meaningful sales in the united states due to all this info: http://www.zdnet.com/dont-trust-huawei-and-zte-us-congressional-committee-warns-7000005378/
Aren't they already under investigation in Europe as well due to product dumping and Chinese government subsidies? or is that something else?

Alright this has just turned me off from all Chinese smartphone products.

Not being culturally or racially biased, but anything that's tied to government agenda is a big no-no for me.
 
Huawei and ZTE won't generate any meaningful sales in the united states due to all this info: http://www.zdnet.com/dont-trust-huawei-and-zte-us-congressional-committee-warns-7000005378/
Aren't they already under investigation in Europe as well due to product dumping and Chinese government subsidies? or is that something else?

Meh.

It's not like I trust our governments and security services at the moment anyway.

Also all the current hardware is made in China already so I don't really see how just adding a brand name changes much.
That article just sounds like trade protectionism to be honest.
 
Meh.

It's not like I trust our governments and security services at the moment anyway.

Also all the current hardware is made in China already so I don't really see how just adding a brand name changes much.
That article just sounds like trade protectionism to be honest.
That's true, but I trust the Chinese even less than I trust ours.

The difference now is that both hardware and software will be made in China now. How good has Huawei and ZTE been in releasing Android kernels/binaries/drivers for their phones on time and updating to the latest version of Android? How active is the XDA forums on their respective phones?

Interesting how you would call the article "trade protectionism" given that the US doesn't really have any telecom equipment vendor to protect.
The largest telecom equipment vendors in the world:
1.) Ericsson: Sweden
2.) Huawei: China
3.) Alcatel-Lucent SA: France
4.) Nokia Siemens Networks: Finland(joint venture between Nokia[Finland] and Siemens[Germany], but Nokia has now bought all of Siemen's stake)
5.) ZTE: China

What "trade" exactly is the US protecting? If it was the EU doing this, you'd have a point about "trade protectionism".
 
That's true, but I trust the Chinese even less than I trust ours.

TBH theres more to worry about on a personal level from your own government rather than a foreign one. You have a lot of protection from foreign powers not so much from your own.

The difference now is that both hardware and software will be made in China now. How good has Huawei and ZTE been in releasing Android kernels/binaries/drivers for their phones on time and updating to the latest version of Android? How active is the XDA forums on their respective phones?

Are you talking from a security viewpoint or a dev support viewpoint? I don't think that the chinese manufacturers are using any unusual hardware, its all of the shelf stuff (as 90% of android handsets are) so I don't see much of a problem either way.

Interesting how you would call the article "trade protectionism" given that the US doesn't really have any telecom equipment vendor to protect.
The largest telecom equipment vendors in the world:
1.) Ericsson: Sweden
2.) Huawei: China
3.) Alcatel-Lucent SA: France
4.) Nokia Siemens Networks: Finland(joint venture between Nokia[Finland] and Siemens[Germany], but Nokia has now bought all of Siemen's stake)
5.) ZTE: China

What "trade" exactly is the US protecting? If it was the EU doing this, you'd have a point about "trade protectionism".

The artice summary is...

Summary: The House of Representatives' Intelligence Committee is set to release a report that calls for the Chinese telecoms kit-makers to be barred from any mergers and acquisitions in the US, and blocked from doing business with government and private firms there.

If there are no sizable telecoms hardware makers in the US then whats the worry?
 
The artice summary is...
Summary: The House of Representatives' Intelligence Committee is set to release a report that calls for the Chinese telecoms kit-makers to be barred from any mergers and acquisitions in the US, and blocked from doing business with government and private firms there.


If there are no sizable telecoms hardware makers in the US then whats the worry?
Because it's a security issue, and not a "trade protectionism" issue.
 
Back
Top