Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
<<snip>>
What does "pushing the boundary of sexual imagery" have to do with anything? Being a sex symbol means you can't help people?
There's nothing wrong with a sex symbol helping others, but this is late in her lifetime when she knows she can't maintain her status quo. She spent most of her energy on her career while younger. Nothing wrong with that, but you can't compare that to the adversity that Gandhi went through. The problem is that I believe this is more for a publicity stunt than anything.
If you want a good example of a sex symbol who legitimately believe in helping the needy look to Angelina Jolie (already mentioned in this thread). She helped third world kids while at the same time maintaining her career as a sultry actress.