Maybe they can take the money that's going to be spent on a useless high speed train to nowhere and apply it to a state of the art voting system. Wanna make bets on which gets done first? 🙂
<< These punchcard machines are really much worse than I thought. The notion that millions of people in America voted but their vote didn't count is anti-democratic. >>
Its also anti-republican 🙂, which in my opinion is why whats happening now really shouldn't. The machines are old technology that has an inherent flaw, but if you distribute that flaw across the entire population of those that used it then the results become more fair or closer to the actual intent of ALL the voters. If you do whats being done now, then the results WILL be skewed because they will be taking away the handicap thats shared equally by everyone everywhere that voted using this method. Thats the way I see it, and I think I'm objective enough that I would see it that way if it was the other way around. Hand counting of ballots such as the ones that are optically scanned is magnitudes of degrees above hand counting these chad droppers.
This particular voting system sucks, and I don't think you'd find anyone that believes otherwise, but, as long as you don't try to outdo the machine's flaws then everyone is subject to equal suckage, and I believe thats why the only recounts that should be done is through the machine unless it can be shown that a particular machine is not functioning as designed. Even then, the machine should be replaced by another one so as not to totally skew the results. Even though the machine fails to count a certain percentage of votes it doesn't know the difference between one party or the other when it kicks a ballot out and thats the ONLY thing about it that IS fair. 🙂