• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Low Performance problems with Raid 0 on HP370

MarcoP

Member
Hi,


I'm upgraded my system (Abit KT7a, Duron 1,2GHz, WinXP, 768MB RAM, 60GB+10GB IBM HDD) with a hp370 raid controller and 2 ibm 80gb hdds.
I created a raid 0 (striping) with 64 kb cluster size. While installing XP I created three 60GB partitions! on the first one - i installed winXP. After the installation was ready I ran Sisoft Sandra 2002 Prof. and tested my performance on drive C (first raid 0 partition). The horrible result: ~16000KB
AFter I searched through the forum I saw people reporting the double data rate!
I also read in another forum, that the partitions should not be the reason for that performance issue.

Thank you
 
Try updating the drivers for it.
And if i recall correctly, the latest BIOS for the KT7A, also has the latest BIOS for the RAID controller.
See what that does. I dont know that much about RAID, apart from the basics, but with a bit of luck, if the above doesnt help, someone who does know about RAID will probably answer back with a fix for you.
 
oh. Well try updating the BIOS for that as well, and the drivers. See if theres any settings in the BIOS screan that youve missed as well.
 
Hi,


my raid card is not flashable - no eeprom or eprom!!!
I'm using bios version 1.03b and now I'm using the new HP winxp driver 2.34!! HighPoint does not recommend using different driver/bios versions but now I'm reaching about 32000kb/s! That's much better - so keep your hands off that winxp inbuilt hp driver!!!

But it nevertheless sounds quite slow to me - at sisoft a hardly compareable other raid 0 with UDMA66 28GB pattern reaches the same but I'm using the newest ibm 180 drive series ...
 
So its fixed? I thought it might be the driver. Most of the drivers in XP are generic and dont include specific hardware optimisations.
 
Back
Top