Low-end Kepler?

Discussion in 'Video Cards and Graphics' started by djw39, Nov 17, 2012.

  1. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any news/rumors on either AMD or Nvidia releasing new versions of their low-end, low power graphics cards which support DirectX 11.1? I am looking to upgrade an old desktop which currently has GMA 3100 integrated graphics, and I'd like to get the full "hardware accelerating everything" benefits when I upgrade to Windows 8, but getting a GTX 650 and a new PSU is clearly overkill.
     
  2. Jaydip

    Jaydip Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    7
  3. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    The HD 7750 or the GTX 650 cost $100 and would require a new PSU for this machine (280/250 watts). Too expensive for a non-gamer. I really just would like to get to the level of Intel's current integrated graphics solutions. This could be accomplished with the 6450 (AMD) or 520/610 (Nvidia). The most I could justify getting would be Turks, HD 6570. But neither company put out a new chip in this price/power class with their current-gen offerings, just rebadged the old ones, and so they don't do Direct3D 11.1.
     
  4. Magic Carpet

    Magic Carpet Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,102
    Likes Received:
    1
  5. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again, at 65w TDP for the GT 640 compared to 18w for the HD 6450 these are not in the same price/power consumption/performance class. My question is about future products, not looking for suggested purchases. The 610/620/630 e
    g. are not Kepler, just rebadged Fermi. They thus are less efficient and don't have DX11.1 support. When do we see real Kepler versions of these low-end solutions?
    Thanks for taking an interest!
     
  6. tviceman

    tviceman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,143
    Likes Received:
    58
  7. infoiltrator

    infoiltrator Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    0
    First, the HD 7750 uses no PCIe power, it is the fastest card that runs off motherboard power.

    Second, Intel iGPU HD4000 Ivy Bridge grapics are equivalent to HD 6670 DDR3/ GT 630 (renamed GT 440).

    Third, Max TDP does not represent power usage under your conditions, you should be looking at idle TDP. Newer card draw less power under light usage than older ones.

    i FIND the HD5450/HD6450 and GT520/GT610 underwhelming at any price.
    Do you want a worthwhile upgrade or not?
    DirectX 11 is not magic, the capability needs a chip that can use it.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5845/...ased-geforce-gt-610-gt-620-gt-630-into-retail

    If you are looking for performance my feeling is HD 6550/GT 430, is the place to start for "future proof'.
     
  8. jacktesterson

    jacktesterson Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2001
    Messages:
    5,490
    Likes Received:
    2
    Agreed
     
  9. Magic Carpet

    Magic Carpet Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,102
    Likes Received:
    1
    I doubt, we'll see anything. Geforce 640 is your best bet for the foreseeable future.

    Given your situation and the circumstances, I would rather just build a new computer.
     
  10. tviceman

    tviceman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,143
    Likes Received:
    58
  11. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Arg. I really didn't want this to turn into everyone throwing in their two cents about upgrade options/telling me to build a new system, else I would have listed the complete system specs and the various inexpensive upgrades I have already made.

    In conclusion, no one appears to know anything about either AMD or Nvidia bringing their current-generation 28nm architectures with Direct3D 11.1 support to low-end discrete gpus, by which I mean comparable to Turks 6570 and retailing for $50-60. Thanks anyway.
     
  12. tviceman

    tviceman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,143
    Likes Received:
    58
    I already told you the the gtx650 would work just fine with your power supply as long as you are not overclocking anything.

    FULL SYSTEM POWER CONSUMPTION WITH OVERCLOCKED HIGH END CPU is 231 watts:
    [​IMG]

    Take off about 20-30 watts for the CPU being overclocked, and you're comfortably under the PSU's rated limit.
     
    #13 tviceman, Nov 18, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2012
  13. notty22

    notty22 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    0
  14. toyota

    toyota Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2001
    Messages:
    12,957
    Likes Received:
    0
    you do not even know what psu that he has though. it could be a cheap oem unit that cant even make much more than 150 watts on the 12v line in realistic conditions.
     
  15. tviceman

    tviceman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,143
    Likes Received:
    58
    You're right, but I doubt he has a gas guzzling high end CPU. I think he'd be fine. http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/KFA2/GTX_650_EX_OC/25.html Average power consumption is 50 watts, max is 54 and that is with a factory overclock.
     
  16. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,589
    Likes Received:
    5
    Why do you even need DX 11.1 on such a low end card anyways?

    Its like asking for a donkey + cart with a windshield, even if one did exist its never going to go fast enough to be of any use...
     
  17. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pm me, that donkey cart sounds dope
     
  18. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    What I'm after is general system responsiveness, and smooth scrolling, consistent frame rates on heavy sites like Google+. Nothing that should require a $100 graphics card, or a full rebuild. But I did read a bit on how Windows 8 is using Direct3D 11.1 to improve base OS and IE10 responsiveness, and I'm curious to see if these refinements will make their way down to the actual lowest end cards for people who don't care about gaming. I suspect they will eventually, but instead everyone is just ignoring the question and suggesting $100 cards.
     
  19. iMacmatician

    iMacmatician Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2012
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, there's the GK208 that's in development. Speculation is that it'll be the successor of the GF119 (520, 610, etc.), so if it is released in retail that might be what you're looking for.

    You may end up waiting some time for that though.
     
  20. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    9,265
    Likes Received:
    107
    I think you are a bit too hung up on DX11.1. I doubt that it is going to make a huge difference in browser performance, especially since it sounds like you have an older system if you currently are running the x3100 graphics.
     
  21. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thanks! That is exactly what I was hoping to find out.
     
  22. AnandThenMan

    AnandThenMan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,768
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've found the warranty coverage lacking honestly.
     
  23. djw39

    djw39 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sure that's true. But I am slowly upgrading the pieces. I just picked up a used Core 2 Duo E8600, which should be a monster upgrade from the Pentium Dual Core E2200 I'm currently running. I already put in 4GB of RAM a few years ago, and added an Intel SSD over the summer. And what I did for the graphics recently was get a Radeon HD 2400 XT for $9. Believe it or not, that is actually a huge performance boost, and the computer finally plays HD videos without stuttering. So I think I'll be perfectly happy to wait for a Kepler refresh sometime in 2013.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Kepler Forum Date
Why Doesn't Anyone Get to the Bottom of the Aging of Kepler and GCN? Video Cards and Graphics Mar 22, 2016
Where does Kepler stand today? Video Cards and Graphics Dec 14, 2015
against gimping kepler Video Cards and Graphics Aug 4, 2015
[HARDOCP] GTA V - The death of Kepler and GCN 1.0 Video Cards and Graphics Apr 28, 2015
Zotac GT630 Kepler, GPU-Z, and 344.11 WHQL. CUDA. Low mem speed??? Video Cards and Graphics Oct 14, 2014