• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Low clock speeds.

Shenkoa

Golden Member
My system specs are in my SIG. I downclocked all the way to 200X4 = 800 Mhz, then I played FEAR SP demo and COD2 demo. Both run at 1024X768 just fine and dandy at that clock speed, its not much different when I take it back up to 260X10.

Is 800 MHz really sufficient for games like that?
I know that games now adays are more limited by the GPU but DAMN!
 
There will have been a reduction in performance.

This would have been far more noticeable if the graphics card was a more modern high end card. It just goes to show you need a balanced system rather than one which excels in just one area.
 
Originally posted by: George Powell
There will have been a reduction in performance.

This would have been far more noticeable if the graphics card was a more modern high end card. It just goes to show you need a balanced system rather than one which excels in just one area.

again basing your statement on what facts??

Just the fact you noticed he had a ati9800 on his specs..lolol

he just told ya no...lol

 
Run FRAPS and see if there was a difference. I'm fairly sure there will have been one.

It also shows we don't all need the latest and greatest hardware to enjoy gaming.
 
Try playing Unreal Tournament 2004 with the cpu set to 800Mhz, you'll notice the difference for sure.
 
Back
Top