ThinClient
Diamond Member
Appearance of sexual characteristics does not indicate an adult mind
Penis does not repeatedly thrust the mind.
Appearance of sexual characteristics does not indicate an adult mind
I bet she did, repeatedly and often.Yeah...who didn't see that coming?
nsfw:Two year bump, but why not have the beginning and the end in one thread?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...9-Doug-Hutchison-53-split-years-marriage.html
They split up.
Stop the presses.
looks 35 at age 19
I'm 32 and I can't imagine being married to a 17 year old. It would be a nightmare.
Banging a 17 year old? No comment.
looks 35 at age 19
Don't you trade in for a newer model at that point? 😛Just imagine how she'll look when she's actually 35.
Penis does not repeatedly thrust the mind.

Don't you trade in for a newer model at that point? 😛
I would have never guessed the guy was that old. Not that 51 is old but he sure as heck doesn't look it.
Just imagine how she'll look when she's actually 35.
At least he had his fun....
Did you look at the picture of her in her red lingerie in the article? She's disgusting. Breasts have magically inflated, got the duck-face going, skin looks horrible...
Frankly, she looks like a run-down used-up hooker. Which may be exactly what she is.
She also tells us all that her breast are rill, her lips are rill, even her eyelashes are rill. Everything about her is rill!
^ rill?