Grammatical errors in many cases arise from stream-of-thought writing, precisely the type of writing that most of us do when we are participating in highly informal 'discussion' formats like 'discussion' forums. People who feel this compelling need to correct other's grammar in such a forum are usually intellectual midgets who correct grammar or spelling because its the ONLY thing they have to feel warm and fuzzy about themselves. They can't formulate a credible and intellectual position, so they correct spelling or grammar.
Furthermore, some people have English as their second, third, or maybe fourth language and understandibly haven't mastered style and usage to the level of someone who has spoken English as their first language for 20 years.
Anyone who edits for professional writers or journalists, or IS a professional writer or journalist, knows that spelling and grammar are common mistakes from which the most educated persons are not immune. As if we are to believe the most highly educated people always produce publish-ready writing off the bat without proof-reading, edit and revision. Right-O!
The REAL issue is whether a highly casual forum is the place where spelling and grammar are as important as substance, as it would be in a published book or newspaper, and demands the same level of proof-reading and revision. Of course, it isn't.
Furthermore, some people have English as their second, third, or maybe fourth language and understandibly haven't mastered style and usage to the level of someone who has spoken English as their first language for 20 years.
Anyone who edits for professional writers or journalists, or IS a professional writer or journalist, knows that spelling and grammar are common mistakes from which the most educated persons are not immune. As if we are to believe the most highly educated people always produce publish-ready writing off the bat without proof-reading, edit and revision. Right-O!
The REAL issue is whether a highly casual forum is the place where spelling and grammar are as important as substance, as it would be in a published book or newspaper, and demands the same level of proof-reading and revision. Of course, it isn't.
