Looks like The Titanic killed a few more people

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,354
10,881
136
well whose gonna tell the manufacturers of the A350 and 787 about this?

However carbon fiber parts on commercial jets that are subjected to repeated high levels of stress are subject (at least in theory!) to inspection and replacement on a schedule.

Also PRIOR to use in passenger aircraft they will usually TEST them a time or two! :oops:


EDIT: I can't find it but somewhere out there in "internet-land" is a video of a 747 prototype having its wings stress-tested with massive hydraulic pistons. If you saw how far those wings could bend before they snap/fracture you would be amazed AND would never take off your seatbelt in a jet aircraft in-flight again. (you can be smashed to a pulp and the plane will literally be fine or close to it... beyond the dents in the cabin ceiling you made with your head that is!)
 
Last edited:

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,559
16,920
146
However carbon fiber parts on commercial jets that are subjected to repeated high levels of stress are subject (at least in theory!) to inspection and replacement on a schedule.

Also PRIOR to use in passenger aircraft they will usually TEST them a time or two! :oops:


EDIT: I can't find it but somewhere out there in "internet-land" is a video of a 747 prototype having its wings stress-tested with massive hydraulic pistons. If you saw how far those wings could bend before they snap/fracture you would be amazed AND would never take off your seatbelt in a jet aircraft in-flight again. (you can be smashed to a pulp and the plane will literally be fine or close to it... beyond the dents in the cabin ceiling you made with your head that is!)
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that pilots avoid turbulence due to what it does to the occupants, not the aircraft.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
If we need to envision how nasty an implosion might actually look like just look at Charlie sheen's career.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: igor_kavinski

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
My mind is more blown by the fact that there were 18 bolts that held the sub closed, and they routinely only closed 17 of them because the 18th was at the top & harder to reach.

Stockton Rush must have been one damn convincible salesman. We're talking the level of politician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,479
6,565
136
One news anchor was pointing out that we know more about the space above us than our own space below us. Which is true.

The press is calling these victims "explorers". I don't look at them as being explorers. Lewis and Clark, now THEY were explorers. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, they were explorers.

These five guys were not explorers, they simply paid a lot of cash and took a ride on a craft that even Disney would reject. But they are not explorers. A half a million for dad and son to commit hari-kari? Gee, thanks dad. Now AnandTech members, aren't you glad u have poor dads?
Yeah, ok, RIP.

PS. I wonder if this would have gotten so much attention if five black women living on welfare had been in that sub?
They weren't explorers, they were tourists.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,415
5,018
136
Wonder what other top secret tech they have.

Top Secret U.S. Navy System Heard Titan Implosion Days Ago

WASHINGTON—A top secret U.S. Navy acoustic detection system designed to spot enemy submarines first heard the Titan sub implosion hours after the submersible began its mission, officials involved in the search said...



SOSUS has been around for quite a while. I'm sure they made many improvements since I've retired.

I read that they reported their findings to the company and the coast guard when the vessel went missing Sunday. Of course they had no proof it was the missing vessel so the search had to go on for verification.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,354
10,881
136
What I read was that the Navy folks were certain it was an implosion of an "underwater vessel/object" in that immediate area at nearly the exact moment communications with Titan were lost.

Of course there was no way to be absolutely positive it was the Titan at the time.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,354
10,881
136
I'm sure testing and certification standards are a little bit more stringent than bicycle parts, so they probably don't have anything to worry about :D

The "not worrying" part is more on the individual airline and their maintenance staff/policies than anything else. ;)

20 year old, meticulously maintained aircraft can be safer then poorly maintained nearly new ones!
 
  • Like
Reactions: thilanliyan

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
However carbon fiber parts on commercial jets that are subjected to repeated high levels of stress are subject (at least in theory!) to inspection and replacement on a schedule.

Also PRIOR to use in passenger aircraft they will usually TEST them a time or two! :oops:


EDIT: I can't find it but somewhere out there in "internet-land" is a video of a 747 prototype having its wings stress-tested with massive hydraulic pistons. If you saw how far those wings could bend before they snap/fracture you would be amazed AND would never take off your seatbelt in a jet aircraft in-flight again. (you can be smashed to a pulp and the plane will literally be fine or close to it... beyond the dents in the cabin ceiling you made with your head that is!)
150% of ultimate load to wing snap. The video that is easiest to find is usually the 777 test. They are also put through fatigue tests to 2x their maximum life time cycles.

We also know how to inspect carbon fiber when new and used. It's honestly amazing stuff, but it isn't a drop in replacement for metal and trying to design with it like you would Aluminum is going to create issues.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
SOSUS has been around for quite a while. I'm sure they made many improvements since I've retired.

I read that they reported their findings to the company and the coast guard when the vessel went missing Sunday. Of course they had no proof it was the missing vessel so the search had to go on for verification.

Don't you mean they refused to reveal the proof? ;) Don't want to expose the full capabilities.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,665
15,243
136
SOSUS has been around for quite a while. I'm sure they made many improvements since I've retired.

I read that they reported their findings to the company and the coast guard when the vessel went missing Sunday. Of course they had no proof it was the missing vessel so the search had to go on for verification.
Also, the ocean is a noisy place, so findings need confirmation, especially when calling off the search would mean closing the door on the rare possibility that they would be found alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,415
5,018
136
Also, the ocean is a noisy place, so findings need confirmation, especially when calling off the search would mean closing the door on the rare possibility that they would be found alive.


Nothing like listening to a cloud of shrimp popping. Sounds like the 4th of July on steroids.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,665
15,243
136
What I read was that the Navy folks were certain it was an implosion of an "underwater vessel/object" in that immediate area at nearly the exact moment communications with Titan were lost.

Of course there was no way to be absolutely positive it was the Titan at the time.
They might have been pretty certain that's what it was, but could you imagine the circus that would ensue if it was later discovered that the noise was something else and the people were alive when the search was prematurely called off?
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
5,345
7,061
136
What I read was that the Navy folks were certain it was an implosion of an "underwater vessel/object" in that immediate area at nearly the exact moment communications with Titan were lost.

Of course there was no way to be absolutely positive it was the Titan at the time.

Or you were reading a site that likes that likes to exaggerate for effect. After the fact when they see the debris field, it's pretty easy to make a definitive call, but initially not so much:


A senior Navy official told CNN the Navy detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion on Sunday in the general area where the vessel was diving and lost communication with its mother ship.

The Navy immediately relayed that information to on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said Thursday.

But the sound of the implosion was determined to be “not definitive,” the official said, and the multinational efforts to find the submersible continued as a search and rescue effort.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
This whole thing kinda reminds of Patrick Boyle chastising crypto investors of "adhering to the proven investment strategy of investing first and performing due diligence after."
 
  • Like
Reactions: [DHT]Osiris