Looking for K6-2+

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
25,122
6,220
146
Do you want a 2+ specifically or would a 3+ suffice? I think www.softwareandstuff.com has 3+'s for 64.95. The bios of a board that recognizes a 2+ should recognize the 3+.
 

ViralCryption

Member
Oct 20, 2000
60
0
0
Actually I was trying to find a K6-2+ because I heard that it performed better and was available at higher speeds.
 

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
25,122
6,220
146
Actually the 2+ is slower than the 3+ and the 3+ easily gets to 550 at overclock and some get 600 or 616. The 2+ might not go that high. Also the 3+ has 256 kb of onboard L2 cache and the 2+ has only 128. Check out cpu scorecard for benchmarks. A K6-3+ 550 has a benchmark of 1405
and a 550 K6-2+ has a benchmark of 1272. Just my 2 cents.

cpuscorecard
 

Hanky

Senior member
Dec 29, 2000
306
0
0
But for the most applications the pure presence and speed of L2-Cache is more important than its size so if there is a certain amount of K6-X+ CPUs with various clockspeeds the fastest overall CPU of this amount would definitely be the one with the most MHz (no matter whether it's a K6-2+ or a K6-III+).
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
ViralCryption- Your going to want to head on over to the K6-X Forum at SlotA. I think it's pretty safe to say that they are the best source for info on how the -x+ series of processors are running on Desktop systems.

You definitely want to go with the -3+ CPU. Most people are getting at least 550MHz out of them, and that's at the default Vcore. 600MHz seems to be easy with decent cooling and maybe a Vcore bump to 2.1-2.2.

Just to warn you: I think that AMD says the MAX Vcore for the -x+ series of CPU's is 2.2, so I wouldn't go exceeding that unless your willing to pay the price. Just thought I'd warn you.

AcesHardware had a review of the K6-2+ processor a little while back. Basically, it showed that a (regular) K6-3 at 500MHz was about as fast as a K6-2+ at 600MHz. Now, given that a K6-3+ will perform the same as a regular K6-3, then I'd say that the best option for you would be a K6-3+ 450 (I think there may be K6-3+ 475's out there though).

Hope this helps you some!

Good Luck! :)
 

chriscraft

Member
Dec 6, 2000
57
0
0
Just for clarification, the link that Chunky postedabove, brings you too "SlotA", and when you click on the BBS link, it takes you to the "AMDZONE" forums, which is what I was going to suggest..

Chunky is correct about the K6-X topic in this forum being the most knowledgeable around..

To give credit where it's due...it's the AMDZONE.COM...then link to "BBS" at top of home page
 

ViralCryption

Member
Oct 20, 2000
60
0
0
Cool, thanks. I must have miss read somewhere because I thought the k6-2+ had the 256 of cache, good looking out guys.