- Apr 15, 2001
- 1,974
- 16
- 81
except he didn't read the original post where I state that my i7 is crunching more than my q9550, that would imply that I have a q9550... and that the purpose of this thread was to attempt to build a low budget i7 system... but if that is relative considering how much an i7 cost compared to a core2Originally posted by: Assimilator1
That's a bit harsh dajeepster, I think he was just trying to help you save some money by suggesting to wait awhile (though 1 yr is rather a longtime) or by crunching via GPUs (a bit too early for that atm I think).
cpu-z V1.49 is indicating that core #0 is running at 2853.9 MHz, QPI at 2446.2 MHzPretty low power drawOriginally posted by: dajeepster
quick down and dirty
257watts under full CPU load...i.e. seti running 8 threads., what speed is it at?
I've been running at 8 threads.... i'll test the next system by rotating between 4 and 8 threads on a weekly basis... or I can just wait for this machine to settle out at 8 threads and then disable HT.Btw have you compared 8 vs 4 threads to see if it is faster? (I assume it would be with the i7 but I'm interested to see if you've tested it).
I thought about doing this... but with a few cheaper cards... and filling up the PCI bus alsoI say get the i7 & then when SETI sorts out the GPU client then whack in a load of GTX 280s too (or whatever's out), best of both worlds then.
so basically... I could go with 3 PCIe graphic cards and 2 PCI graphic cards on the ASUS and two and two on the MSI Platinum board... but it's just a pipe dream right now... I haven't got any results back on my 8800gt running seta@home beta yet...and it's been 3days
