- Jun 17, 2001
- 55,420
- 1,600
- 126
Cliffs:
We get behind on deadlines
We get (more meetings) to shuffle around assignments
Meetings do nothing since workload remains the same
Should Ns1 sit there and take it or stick his neck out and make a point?
Full Post:
So any given quarter, we have about 40-60 projects that we need to complete. Each project is assigned a priority 1-10 and each have their own corresponding deadlines.
It is not uncommon for us to be behind on the deadlines.
Currently we report to management our status in 2 different ways: 1 is a master excel file in which we update as we complete various assignments. 2 is a status report given every Friday to management, that says what we did, what we need to do, and when we expect to complete it.
So, when we are backed up, we have "additional" meetings. The point of these "meetings" is to shuffle around our various assignments and decide which assignments we need to complete first, with each meeting lasting about 15 minutes.
Now, my entire team feels that these meetings are a fucking waste. It is what it is; we're behind, we know we gotta get that shit done, and we are trying to get shit done as fast as we can. The gripe is that these meetings do nothing but shuffle around work that we already behind on, or repeat things that have already been said via status reports. What we need is time to finish said projects, and having more meetings is not the way to do that.
So, should I bring it up, or is there some point that I'm missing?
We get behind on deadlines
We get (more meetings) to shuffle around assignments
Meetings do nothing since workload remains the same
Should Ns1 sit there and take it or stick his neck out and make a point?
Full Post:
So any given quarter, we have about 40-60 projects that we need to complete. Each project is assigned a priority 1-10 and each have their own corresponding deadlines.
It is not uncommon for us to be behind on the deadlines.
Currently we report to management our status in 2 different ways: 1 is a master excel file in which we update as we complete various assignments. 2 is a status report given every Friday to management, that says what we did, what we need to do, and when we expect to complete it.
So, when we are backed up, we have "additional" meetings. The point of these "meetings" is to shuffle around our various assignments and decide which assignments we need to complete first, with each meeting lasting about 15 minutes.
Now, my entire team feels that these meetings are a fucking waste. It is what it is; we're behind, we know we gotta get that shit done, and we are trying to get shit done as fast as we can. The gripe is that these meetings do nothing but shuffle around work that we already behind on, or repeat things that have already been said via status reports. What we need is time to finish said projects, and having more meetings is not the way to do that.
So, should I bring it up, or is there some point that I'm missing?
