Looking for a 24-port gigabit router/gateway

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,369
10,066
126
Simple example: I use old Aironet 1100s for 2.4 WiFi. These are dirt cheap on eBay, so I have at least one preconfigured backup on hand. The 2.4 devices started acting up, so I popped out the existing Aironet and slotted in the backup. 5 minutes and done. Life went on, and I could take my time to troubleshoot the old WAP later.

This. I have a few backup 8-port gig-e switches, and at least one backup router. I also have duplicates of both my FIOS router, and DSL modem/router.

Backups are good, keeps downtime at a minimum.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,134
38
91
You guys were right. I got the Motorola cable modem router and it started crapping out a week or so ago. I ended up buying a separate modem and router this time. The wireless router on that thing sucked really bad. Never again.
 

azazel1024

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
901
2
76
All SOHO switches are cheap, as in terrible. That's why they're so cheap.

You don't really expect for a $200 24-port switch to be as fast or as reliable as a $3000 24-port switch, based solely on the fact that it's unmanaged, do you?

You get what you pay for.

That said, a Cisco 2911 and a SM-ES3G-24-P will get you a great router/firewall/switch. You're not going to like the price, though.

Also, most fixed-configuration L3 switches (such as a 3750 or an EX2200) do not support NAT and thus are not useful in this instance.

Hmmm, funny, not my experience.

As fast as a $3000 24-port switch, ABSOLUTELY! Why wouldn't it be? If the switching fabric can handle full port speed at full duplex for all ports, it'll be EXACTLY as fast as a $3000 24-port switch and if matters, I've tested dozens of switches (both cheap dumb switches, good semi-managed L2 switches, fully managed L2 switches and L3 switches, both ones I've owned, borrowed as well as worked with) and I've never noticed a difference in networking performance at the same packet size other than standard test variation between tests (IE less than a 1% difference from test to test and across switches). There are of course differences in features, such as supporting jumbo frames, VLANs, etc. I have also seen issues such as claiming jumbo frame support, but not actually working, etc. Feature bugs (but I've seen them in $2,000 L3 switches and in $20 dumb switches).

As relaible, hmmm, maybe not. I've yet to have a switch die or cause real problems (other than one of my semi-managed L2s, which hiccuped when I had a power surge that fried my ONT box, that required a factory reset on the switch and its been working fine since). Granted I HAVE seen problem switch, I've just never owned one. I am probably on switch number....30? At this point over the years.

I can't think of a time I've bought "an expensive" switch. Mostly dumb or semi-managed L2 switches (back in the day, 10Mbps, then 10/100 and now gigabit switches).