Looking at a Computer Shopper from Jan 1995... hehe

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HappyCracker

Senior member
Mar 10, 2001
939
5
81
Our first computer, my dad went to a swap meet in LA and got us a mom n pop made 286. Wow! It was I think 8 MHz with a turbo button that got you to 12 or 16. 16 meg HD and 640k RAM. The 3.5 inch drive was a new thing at the time so we had that and the 5.25 incher, EGA was standard for monitors. Anyone remember XTree? That was mid-late 80s. In 91-92, I was in Best Buy and bought B17 Flying Fortress and it wouldn't run on it, we even tried taking it back because we thought the disks were bad. My parents ended up getting a new computer pretty much for that game. They got a Tandy Sensation! 486SX -25MHz, 4 MB RAM, 1x CDROM, and a whopping 106 MB HD. That thing was bad azz because it came with a 2800 baud modem. My dad used to sit on AOL all the time. Still have the manual that came with that computer. An extra 4 MB RAM cost my dad $80 back then. Finally in late 1998 we got a new Dell P2 450. That was the most drastic change I've noticed next to replacing my P2 400 laptop with this XP2500 desktop. It's wierd how when you get a new computer, you can't really imagine how anything could get faster than that. Ahh the memories.
 

Whitedog

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 1999
3,656
1
0
OH MY GOD!!!!!

I forgot about the TURBO BUTTON!!!

LMAO!!! ROTF!!!! PIMP!!!!

Yea, that was a good one. "let's make it run slower, then add a button to make it run at normal speed... we'll call it "Turbo!"

Woot!
rolleye.gif


I want to put a Turbo Button on my tower I have now...
Someone will ask "What does that do?"
I'll say "Go ahead and press it."
Then I'll have it wired to one of those REALLY Annoying fans that do like 10,000 rpm... and it Turn it on.
They'll go like WOW!

HAHAHAHAHA
 

squidman

Senior member
May 2, 2003
643
0
0
Amigas...yes...double axe...Donald duck...yup, those were the kick-ass titles back then. I envied my friend who had an Amiga sooooo much! I was 9 back then, (1994) and all i had was a basic nintendo...God, did i want to have a floppy drive. Then my friend got a p 100 system in 1996 in Russia. He paid 4000 g's for that $#!+ !!!. I was really jelaous! But then, i topped fools in 1998 with a K6 266 and 64 SIMM EDO DRAM!!!! Dang, 2 mb S3 Virge DX!!!!! No h/w acceleration at all! i had sixty fo' megs of ram! Thats was cool. Now, u can get a pc for 600 bux!
 

squidman

Senior member
May 2, 2003
643
0
0
Originally posted by: Whitedog
OH MY GOD!!!!!

I forgot about the TURBO BUTTON!!!

LMAO!!! ROTF!!!! PIMP!!!!

Yea, that was a good one. "let's make it run slower, then add a button to make it run at normal speed... we'll call it "Turbo!"

Woot!
rolleye.gif


I want to put a Turbo Button on my tower I have now...
Someone will ask "What does that do?"
I'll say "Go ahead and press it."
Then I'll have it wired to one of those REALLY Annoying fans that do like 10,000 rpm... and it Turn it on.
They'll go like WOW!

HAHAHAHAHA

OH MY GAWD!!!!! TURBO SUPER!!!! I had TURBO BUTTON on my 386!!!! Thats was like "Wow!", and when i pressed it, i said to myself "Super-powers: engaged!" and felt sooooo cool. But good idea, tho - bring up them good ol days and put up a turbo button on a pc case....with 10,000rpm fans! Can you imagine the fascination from that teeny button with a yellow light on top of it?

 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
i remember when i was freshman and this chick had the newest Pentium 200 MHZ MMX. She had a black case and all. Looked sleek and hot, just like her. I was up there about 4 times a week jsut hanging out. Thing cost her parents an arm and leg. So hot ...
 

Wintermute76

Senior member
Jan 8, 2003
364
0
0
I don't remember how long ago it was, i'd say later eighties, my dad bought our first computer, a Kaypro 8088 (4.77MHz). It had a 10MB HDD, 640kB RAM, CGA video and a 12" monitor, I remember playing Mechwarrior for hours on that thing, I had to put my mech on full speed and walk away for 15 minutes just to cross the map to get into range it ran so slow. I think he paid somethiong like $1000 for it as the 286's had just come out.

 

Spyro

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2001
3,366
0
0
I'm really enjoying reading this whole thread :)

Xtree Gold, cga, 16 colors...... LOL..... Yup those were the days........

(Ack, I still remember trying to figure out what a turbo button actually was for, I like the idea of hooking it up to a high powered fan, when I get my new system, though :D)
 

alewisa

Junior Member
May 23, 2003
10
0
0
Originally posted by: HappyCracker
Our first computer, my dad went to a swap meet in LA and got us a mom n pop made 286. Wow! It was I think 8 MHz with a turbo button that got you to 12 or 16. 16 meg HD and 640k RAM. The 3.5 inch drive was a new thing at the time so we had that and the 5.25 incher, EGA was standard for monitors. Anyone remember XTree? That was mid-late 80s. In 91-92, I was in Best Buy and bought B17 Flying Fortress and it wouldn't run on it, we even tried taking it back because we thought the disks were bad. My parents ended up getting a new computer pretty much for that game. They got a Tandy Sensation!

Cor, the Turbo button that increased clock speed by 4Mhz. 12Mhz from an 8Mhz box, 16 from a 12Mhz box. Lovely idea. I had a PS/2 at work, and they didn't have turbo buttons :-( We used to use DrawPerfect for diagrams in WordPerfect documents. and it ran sooo slowly on a 286. Xtree was a dream. Lovely peice of software. For a while I used to use it as a shell, and launch WordPerfect, Supercalc etc from within it, then swapped to DesqView for 'true multitasking' As if... that hapepned when I got home and used the Amiga! But It was fun on the PC.

Remember the 32mb hard disk barrier? These PS/2s had 40mb hard disks (yes, thet 40MB!) that had to be partitioned into C and D in order to use all the space. We used to store all apps on C, and all data on D, for ease of backup.

Remember Expanded and Extended memory, and the confusion they caused? Extended was anything over the 640Kb (ulp!) barrier, and could be used by programs with the help of a DOS Extender, e.g. s/w could be run direct from Extended RAM. Expanded (EMS) had to be bank swapped, i.e. it didn't really have a physical address, it was more like a memory pagefile (which I'm sure you kiddies will be comfortable with!!! wink) . Mainly used to hold data, such as spreadsheets which is one reason the original spec was LIM - Lotus, Intel, Microsoft). Lotus was the driver, as they found that 640K was not enought to hold the 1-2-3 software plus the actual spreadsheet data. With a little trick it could hold program code, which was then swapped into use on demand, but this was risky.

My PS/2 had 2mb RAM, and the fun I had fine tuning that you acheive a good balance of EMS and XMS. Then came along DesqView, and then QEMM! Wow, hackers delight (I use hacker in the original sense, not the media sense). I could fine tune a PC and get almost all base RAM available. QEMM was the absolute cannines googlies, much better thabn 386MAX or MS s/w. Remember trying to cramm the HMA and UMB areas (which still exist, kiddie winkles) to free up as much of the 640K base as possible. Hell, Quarterdeck's product was so good, it was widely felt that MS tweaked Windows 3.1 to conflict with it. And then the technology was bundled with DRDOS6 and 7 - well wicked dos.

Hell, a good read on this can be found here EMS and XMS btw this text is way obsolete, but please have a read and see what we were upgainst in 1992!!! Hey, look at those chip times!!! 150ns! 60ns RAM, fast video RAM of 25ns ;-)

Remember adding a 287 math co-pro to the PS/2, and Supercalc ran much faster. Was a happy bunny for all of about 3 weeks. PS/2 was a stonking tower case, it had to be as the hard disks were huge. Hey, speed in those days wasnt about playing with a few BIOS settings and a heat sink. Oh no, it was fine tuning the RAM, decisions over EMS (EEMS was better), XMS, tune the HMA, UMB et al, and then the best drive technology - not just IDE vs SCSI, but ST-506 (and a subchoice of MFM or RLL encoding), ESDI, SCSI, or IDE. ST-506? Unlucky, large and slow. ESDI? Faster, but expensive. SCSI - price prohibitive, just for the controller card (in those days, 8bit 5MHz was standard, 10MHz was called Fast-SCSI II) Once you had your drive, you changed the low level format, the block interleave. Yup, some drives were so "fast" that the blocks had to be interleaved in order for the disk to read the data. It could take 11 revolutions of the disk to read 11 sectors... if you were lucky, you had a drive that was capable of sequentially reading the blocks, and so set up a 1:1 interleave. That really did result in a mammoth system speed boost!

The PS/2 had an ESDI disk subsyem (well, what else would you expect from Big Blue, only the best!) 40mb, large and fast. Well, it wasnt the best interleave on the block. IBM didnt tune the PS/2 - and I dont mean tune the system; along with everyone else, they played safe. Test a disk with a controller, work out the safe interleave. Many months later, the same interleave is still used regardless of whether the drives have improved in interim. Who cares, it gave us little tinkers an opportunity to tune the interleave, and wave the willy at the next door neighbour who couldnt understand why their identical PS2 was slower ;-).

Its not brilliant, but read this for an overview of dead disk technology.

Drive types

486SX -25MHz, 4 MB RAM, 1x CDROM, and a whopping 106 MB HD. That thing was bad azz because it came with a 2800 baud modem. My dad used to sit on AOL all the time. Still have the manual that came with that computer. An extra 4 MB RAM cost my dad $80 back then. Finally in late 1998 we got a new Dell P2 450. That was the most drastic change I've noticed next to replacing my P2 400 laptop with this XP2500 desktop. It's wierd how when you get a new computer, you can't really imagine how anything could get faster than that. Ahh the memories.

In these days I was programming with the Army, a very small team (6 of us) providing IT support to about 11,000 engineers. We 'coded' in Supercalc and DBASE, then Paradox and GRASS (application programming). We had had one 386/33 in the office, and used to fight over getting on it for DrawPerfect use. Nice machine, and I still like the sound of "386/33", it just sounds fast! We finally managed to upgrade the PS/2's to 386 machines, a mixture of 386DX40 and 386SX25. Ach, that was where Intel went wrong, releasing braindead chips like the SX (there again, IBM launched the PC/AT with a 286 when the 386 was available, and then lost the lead to compaq who launched the first 386 based PC, which is why all the ancient benchmarks benched against a Compaq 386/33).

Then one of the other guys, Marty Smith, bought a 486/25, soundblaster (not sure which!), and 8mb RAM. Well wicked, although still thought the Amiga sound was better. But it was faster than my 2000 with 68030, I felt. C= took a long time releasing an 040 based Amiga, and I couldn't afford an 040 based accelerator for mine. In fact, it took me many years to get a better Amiga... 1998/99, when even the die-hards started moving away. I swapped a 9gb UW SCSI disk for a 4000/030, then obtained a Warp Engine 040 daughter board (replaced the 030 CPU daughterboard), Cybervision 64-3D gfx card. A mate even gave me an A1200 tower with 060 card. Actually, he didnt give it me. He wanted to sell, let me use it for a while to see if I wanted it, and I moved. Hmm. I still owe him £100 for that. Sugar. Was it Gary??? Oops, if ever you read this, I didn't mean to "rip you off" mate.

At this point, I feel the enthusiast angle of PC reached a zenith of sorts. Discussion over what was better, PCI or VESA Local local busses, DX or DX/2 processors (the 486DX50 was faster than the 486DX2-66, as the bus dan at full speed rather than half bus speed), issues with bus timings, DX2-80, and the (in)famous White Lightning triple clocked 486 chips. Then came Pentium, and all we could do was add cache RAM (CELP sockets!), and o/c the chip. No more interesting debates or choices of chips - not Intel, AMD, Cyrix, but what sort of 486? DX, SX, SLC, /2, /3, or normal?!!!

I bought a PC card for the Amiga, originally a 386SX based chip, but could be upgraded to use the 486SLC chip, and wow, did that work wonders. WIth a MAC card I could have 3 PCs in one box all running full speed, as it was not emulation but actual hardware.

Ah, those were the days. Hmm, were they? I used to make the same comment in the very early 90's when disparaging MS software for being bloatware, and recall the days of programming in <64K (the C64 had 64K, but only 38Kb available to user, including screen RAM, oh, what you would understand as gfx memory). I used to swear that all programmers should learn on a VIC-20, and learn to code in just 3.5Kb of RAM. "Cor, 640kb! Spoilt, you are. I had to learn on a VIC-20 with just 3kb. I thought heaven had come when I had a C64 and a whole whopping 30KB to play with". there again, I also used to swear by hand-crafted assembler as opposed to the bloaty machine code produced by compliers. Or even better, the stuff that BASIC compliers produced!!! For a giggle, a friend started low level programming Windows, dissembling the various routines, and replacing them with his own, coded by hand assembler rather than compiled C/C+.

Other o/c moments. O/c an Acorn Atom (forerunner of the BBC Micro, did you ever get them in the States?) to 2MHz, and eventually blowing it, and then o/cing the C64 to 2MHz, just cos I could.

Bloody hell, I must seem a right old crumbly! Able to drivel on about ancient dead technology at the drop of a hat. Whenever nearly-deads go on about the "good old days" I used to retort "ah yes, those were the days of influenze and whooping cough, when we used to shove small children up chimneys to clean them, and not care if they lived or died. Child labour and mass poverty, rationing and bayonet charges in the face of machine gun fire. Makes sense, I guess, provided youre the guy with the machine gun."

I think I'll shut up now!

Brgds
Alan
 

Zepper

Elite Member
May 1, 2001
18,998
0
0
Actually the Turbo button was really for slowing the system down for DOS games that ran too fast at the Normal Turbo speed.
You were supposed to leave it in Turbo position for normal use. Generally regardless of the CPU speed, the non-turbo positiion was locked at about 8MHz on all machines beyond the original 286(AT).
.bh.
 

alewisa

Junior Member
May 23, 2003
10
0
0
Originally posted by: Zepper
Actually the Turbo button was really for slowing the system down for DOS games that ran too fast at the Normal Turbo speed.
You were supposed to leave it in Turbo position for normal use. Generally regardless of the CPU speed, the non-turbo positiion was locked at about 8MHz on all machines beyond the original 286(AT).
.bh.

Hmmm... although it's a long ago, and I'm not 100% sure, I think that you may not be correct. (btw, this isn't a flame!). I do remember adverts for 8/12 and 12/16MHz PC's, with the higher speed refered to as Turbo.

However, I could well be wrong (or have wholly misunderstood the turbo button for all these years!), and you right that it was actually a de-turbo button. Or we could both be right.

But I do miss the turbo button on PC cases. Even as recent as 2000 cases had a turbo button and LED. I used to use the LED for wiring up to a 2nd SCSI adaptor's LED.

The button just pushed in and out. Hmm, would be useful now for selecting TURBO fan mode :)

 

Whitedog

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 1999
3,656
1
0
The button just pushed in and out. Hmm, would be useful now for selecting TURBO fan mode :)
And maybe get one of those smoke machines so smoke would come out the PC when you pressed it.

LOL!
 

bluemax

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2000
7,182
0
0
Originally posted by: Whitedog
The button just pushed in and out. Hmm, would be useful now for selecting TURBO fan mode :)
And maybe get one of those smoke machines so smoke would come out the PC when you pressed it.

LOL!
Don't do it, man... they're oil based and in addition to possibly RUINING your equipment it smells like crap. :Q

Of course, it would be funny to see....

What's this? Turbo button, eh? hmmmm.... *doot* WHOAAAaaaaa!!!
 

dpm

Golden Member
Apr 24, 2002
1,513
0
0
I was under the impression that the Turbo button was supposed to be 'always on' too. I'm sure I remember reading that you were to turn it off if a game was running too fast. Otherwise, what would be the point?

Anyway, I can't talk from knowledge, as my first pc was a 486sx 25 - after the days of the turbo button. I used a bunch of 386s though, and learnt the 'joys' of windows 3.0. and... what was that microsoft dos filemanager called? Dostree?
And i remember well struggling with XMS and EMS for old games, and trying to squeeze out that extra kb cos i was too poor to buy QEMM ( a friend of mine had it, and used to go on and on about how good it was. grrr)

Still can't believe i sold my bike for a sb pro. £100 for a bloody mono soundcard!

Before that I had a couple of spectrums.... now there was some serious hardware.
 

DurocShark

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
15,708
5
56
o/cing the C64 to 2MHz, just cos I could.

I added ram internally (512k! Woot!), but never o/c'd the proc. I also never understood why the 128 only came with half the vid ram necessary to run in full color 80col mode. ;) I had a good biz upgrading all of 'em to 16k (I think?).

I'd love to get my hands on a 128d and hack it into a PC. :D Anybody wanna give me one? You can keep the KB and the guts, I just want a 128d case.
 

Aztech

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2002
1,922
0
0
I remember the 2" thick computer shopper! Man, I guess most of those companies didn't make it. I wished I had kept one to flip through to reminess and laugh. It was kinda funny, I'd find people good computer deals, then the company would go under. Quantex was the most recent time that happened. Also, remember Northgate? They went under, but the keyboard survived. They still sell it somewhere for good money. It had the best feel to it.

Hey dog, what was that company that always had the lightning in their ads (on the monitor). That's been bugging me for a while.

I still have a case at home with a turbo button. It's a Cyrix DLC-40! :) I bought it from this chick in college. The hard drive was 250MB, but about half of it was bad sectors!:frown:

Midwest Micro, oh yeah! I used look at their add regularly. I seem to remember a transition to Systemax, which is still around.

Micron, Gateway and Dell kicked all that ssa! But I don't believe that there's room for even these 3. We know DeLL ain't going nowhere, but either Micron or Gateway is next, IMHO.

Thanks for the trip down memory lane!
 

dakels

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,809
2
0
Not that many of you can relate to macs... but I still have a Mac II fx. Release in 1990. 40mhz 68030 processor, 32mb RAM, 160mb SCSI HD original price was about $8500!!!!
This was when the average PC was a 386 or 486. Whats funny is that this machine is still quite usable. It can't load the newest OS's or applications but it is still very capable for word processing or a print server. Also surprising is that they still sell at about $100-150 to collectors. This machine and latter macs in it's day were top notch and really helped push the A/V computer graphics/desktop publishing industry. Macs came with SCSI instead of IDE and had built in audio and video capabilities, including A/V capture, which no normal PC at the time had on board.

I went from that to a G3 350. Thats like the jump from a 486DX to a P3 1ghz.

On the PC end the last non mac PC I owned was a commodore 64 . Went to a P4 2.66ghz. Now that's a jump :p

btw I still have a Tandy TRS-80 if anyone remembers what that is.
 

RyuRobD

Member
Dec 3, 2002
67
0
0
It's quite funny. Today, I bought a pc for 3 dollars with a 14 " monitor. Although it seems to be a pentium, it has a turbo button on it... Good stuff
 

Texun

Platinum Member
Oct 21, 2001
2,058
1
81
Originally posted by: Zepper
Yup, I remember buying some memory at Sam's Club at that time. They were 4MB SIMMs at $40./MB=$160.!!! Edit: Can you imagine??? If they had 256MB modules at the time, they would have cost in the vicinity of $10,000. !!!![/b]
I remember that time perfectly. Shortly after the $40/meg price dropped I jumped on 16 megs for $198, thinking the price would go up again, and I felt like I had stolen it.

I have three PCs now and a 5 sticks of 512. At $40\Meg the cost today would be $102,400.00 for 2,560 megs.

Somewhere in the early or mid 90's one of my early mobo-cpu combos came in a white box with a board, DX4-100 and a manual assuring me of quality service and support after the sale - but there wasn't any mention of the manufacture. No address, phone number, nothing. Zip, zero, nadda. I haven't the slightest idea who made the thing. It cost me $300. I thought I had more power than than NASA when I booted it up the first time. Went for the cheap 486 since some of the first Pentium motherboards were selling for $600.

Let's not forget the first USR Sportster 28.8 for $189.00.

One more: Bought a 4X CD Rom for $170!

The hell of it is that none of that old stuff would be worth the postage it would take to mail it across the street.