• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

LOL....

Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fuck off" if there's something beside it, like quotes.

:thumbsup:

That is what I would call a "shitty language filter".
 
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fuck off" if there's something beside it, like quotes.

:thumbsup:

That is what I would call a "shitty language filter".


Truly. Any filter that would let us say such things would be a piece of shit.
 
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fuck off" if there's something beside it, like quotes.

:thumbsup:

That is what I would call a "shitty language filter".

Truly. Any filter that would let us say such things would be a piece of shit.

My virgin eyes need to be shielded from such brazen uses of profanity.
 
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fukc" if there's something beside it, like quotes.
This is not new, people have had their PeePee whacked for this in the past.............

 
Originally posted by: Slacker
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fukc" if there's something beside it, like quotes.
This is not new, people have had their PeePee whacked for this in the past.............


It's not like I put an empty UBB tag in the middle of it or something tricky.
 
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: Slacker
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fukc" if there's something beside it, like quotes.
This is not new, people have had their PeePee whacked for this in the past.............


It's not like I put an empty UBB tag in the middle of it or something tricky.

Who would do that?

/looks around
 
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: Slacker
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fukc" if there's something beside it, like quotes.
This is not new, people have had their PeePee whacked for this in the past.............


It's not like I put an empty UBB tag in the middle of it or something tricky.

Who would do that?

/looks around


Not I, certainly. That would be an act of circumventing the language filter that has been so graceously put into place for our protection. It would indeed be quite naughty. But if you can type a word that would normally be censored, but with quotes around it or at the end of a sentence sothat it is followed by a period, and it gets through, then I'd say that the fault is with the filter scheme, and not the poster.
 
Originally posted by: KLin
I wonder how much the FCC fined them for that. 😛

Depends if anyone complained. Just look at the complaints to the FCC over the half-time show with Paul. Something like 3 letter to complain about the lyrics, and 2 about how boring it was.
 
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: Slacker
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Neat, looks like we can say "Fukc" if there's something beside it, like quotes.
This is not new, people have had their PeePee whacked for this in the past.............


It's not like I put an empty UBB tag in the middle of it or something tricky.

Who would do that?

/looks around


Not I, certainly. That would be an act of circumventing the language filter that has been so graceously put into place for our protection. It would indeed be quite naughty. But if you can type a word that would normally be censored, but with quotes around it or at the end of a sentence sothat it is followed by a period, and it gets through, then I'd say that the fault is with the filter scheme, and not the poster.

If that were held against us then we would be in the position of having to figure out what words ought to be censored, rather than just not posting the words that are. That wouldn't be fair at all. Holding us to those kinds of standards would be pretty shitty.
 
Back
Top