• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

lol James Hetfield pisses off his neighbors

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: IGBT
..would be interesting to find out if the "existing road" is evident as an easement on his deed and other deeds in the area. I know of numerous examples in Shasta County that were in violation of easements and the fences/gates had to come down.
Click to expand...

*crosses fingers*
 
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: IGBT
..would be interesting to find out if the "existing road" is evident as an easement on his deed and other deeds in the area. I know of numerous examples in Shasta County that were in violation of easements and the fences/gates had to come down.
Click to expand...

*crosses fingers*
Click to expand...


..and the fence it self. is it actually on his property? he may be entitled to a gate but the structure on both sides of the road may be on BLM land or someone elses property. Lots of questions here.
 
so the guy donates 100s of acres of land for public hiking use and then people bitch when he puts up a fence around the rest of it.

goddamned hippies
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
so the guy donates 100s of acres of land for public hiking use and then people bitch when he puts up a fence around the rest of it.

goddamned hippies
Click to expand...

yeap. the guy does something good and does not want his land ruined. then people whine and want to sue to take that from him. really it amazes me at times.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
his property hsi choice. the fact that people used it for years for free shouldnt really matter.
Click to expand...

..all existing roads were/are easements on someone elses property. The sidewalk in front of your home is an easement on your property.

 
Originally posted by: waggy
his property hsi choice. the fact that people used it for years for free shouldnt really matter.
Click to expand...

according to the law, it does matter.

not that i believe the law is always right.

 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
so the guy donates 100s of acres of land for public hiking use and then people bitch when he puts up a fence around the rest of it.

goddamned hippies
Click to expand...

Yea, but he ruined that straw hat wearing hippy's 'beautiful, spiritial walk.'
 
Good for him.

I think James is a great guy. Just the fact that he's donated hundreds of acres shows this.

It's his property.. Just because someone made some nature trails on it does not mean anything.

He should fence the trails off and replant them as far as I'm concerned.
 
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
It's a fire road, correct? What happens if there's a fire?
Click to expand...
That's why the solid metal part of the fence doesn't go all the way across the road. It can still be accessed.
 
Sorry all, but 50 years of continuous trail access by the public, 25 years designated as an 'official' trail by the county, and 9 years under the current owner's (Hetfield's) ownership, indicates an easement. I respect property rights as much as anyone, but this is how property rights work. You can't just allow the public to have access to your property for years and years, and then just change your mind and take it away. Remember the old adage, 'Possession is 9/10th's of the law.'
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Sorry all, but 50 years of continuous trail access by the public, 25 years designated as an 'official' trail by the county, and 9 years under the current owner's (Hetfield's) ownership, indicates an easement. I respect property rights as much as anyone, but this is how property rights work. You can't just allow the public to have access to your property for years and years, and then just change your mind and take it away. Remember the old adage, 'Possession is 9/10th's of the law.'
Click to expand...

Where is the line drawn, though? It's his property.... And he says he erected the fence due to vandalism. He doesn't have to put up with people vandalizing his property.
 
Originally posted by: Led Zeppelin
The fucking thing is ugly though. Yeah it's his property, but shit, make the fence somewhat pleasing to the eye.
Click to expand...


..he prob.never sees it. comes in/out in a helicopter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top