Rambus will say on monday, "Clearly, Intel does not know how to fabricate benchmarks. That is our forte. Had they let us do the benchmarks, the i820 plus RDRAM would have won by at least 100%. We are very discouraged at this lackluster benchmark fabrication. We would now like to make public a law suit filed on saturday against Intel Corporation on the grounds of libel."
Maybe I'm just plain stupid but I don't understand the Benches :|. I don't think I know that much about these different benches but isn't it normally the highest number that counts?!?!?!. If so I can't see how the 815 beats the 820.
Anyway it's by margins which in any case can't get any worse for Intel. Thier marketing-gag didn't exactly work
<< Maybe I'm just plain stupid but I don't understand the Benches . I don't think I know that much about these different benches but isn't it normally the highest number that counts?!?!?!. If so I can't see how the 815 beats the 820. >>
I checked on it, they just got the columns mixed up in the article. The i815 should be where the i820 is and vice versa. Phew, I was getting scared there for a moment
If you go to Intel's website, you'll see what I'm talking about and the numbers match up. I'll send them an email to correct the mixup.
BTW, this is the funniest news in the computer industry since a hole was found in Frontpage 2000 that mocked out Netscape (put in there by MS programmers to insult Netscape programmers).
Where's fkloster??!! I was going crazy looking for his reply. I'm dying to know what kind of crap he has to defend is ram. Maybe now people will wake up about rambuts!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.