• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

lockheed martin Versus Boeing Versus Northrop Grumman

Originally posted by: Buickbeast
lockheed because of "skunkworks", SR71, F-117, B2, etc...

I believe the B-2 was northrop... the flyin wing was their trademark design... I have a friend that works over at raytheon.. he says he programs "weather satellights"
 
lockheeds stealth bomber was better
govt gave the contract to northrop bc they wanted to keep them in business to have someone to compete with lockheed (keep prices down)

stealth boat + lockheed > *
 
Northrop and Grumman merged to protect themselves from takeover attempts from Martin Mariettas

McDonnal Douglas offered itself up to Boeing for 'Merger' (buy-out) when they were by-passed on the JSF Phase 2 contract award.
Boeing had already acquired Rockwell International (B-1 & Shuttle) by that time.

Lockheed bought out General Dynamics & Convair and asumed their assets, then Martin Marietta
'merged' (fully acquired) Lockheed and dropped the 'Marietta' from their name by selling off their
aggregate and mining assets. Where 39 mighty independant Aerospace Giants once stood,
there were 3 Major players, and 2 smaller ones waiting for the next vulture to swoop down.

Incestuous families that eat their own.

If you really want to know
Kind of a bitter pill . . .
 
Originally posted by: Gatecrasher3
is the question what company kills people best?
the sr71 never killed a person and possibly spared the world from nuclear winter by keeping the soviets in check during the cold war

go ahead and live in your perfect fantasy world while the lockheeds and raytheons of the world protect your sorry ass

 
Back
Top