Lockheed could soon be making a plane that can reach Mach 6

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,294
34,721
136
I was going to advocate for a hypersonic flying submarine. Mach 6 under the sea would be badass. So I searched on "The Speed of Sound in Seawater" and I got the name of a band as the first hit. They're not bad.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,878
18,081
126
I was going to advocate for a hypersonic flying submarine. Mach 6 under the sea would be badass. So I searched on "The Speed of Sound in Seawater" and I got the name of a band as the first hit. They're not bad.

So Tsunami everywhere you go?
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
I personally doubt they're going to really build an SR-72, and if they do it won't be what people expect (it won't be a spyplane, it'll basically be a testbed for supersonic testing).

From what I recall reading, what they're actually wanting out of this is basically a more direct ICBM-esque weapon. ICBM's trajectory takes time and it allows some possible intercept. Being able to do more direct paths means less time for detection/tracking and response. It doesn't have to be nuclear either, they want super speed missiles to effectively replace cruise missiles, where the speed offers extra energy and piercing power (bunker busting) capability.
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,609
3,587
136
From what I recall reading, what they're actually wanting out of this is basically a more direct ICBM-esque weapon. ICBM's trajectory takes time and it allows some possible intercept. Being able to do more direct paths means less time for detection/tracking and response. It doesn't have to be nuclear either, they want super speed missiles to effectively replace cruise missiles, where the speed offers extra energy and piercing power (bunker busting) capability.
boost-glide weapons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost-glide