• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

lock

Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
 
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...
OK.
 
Well, if you're EngineNr9, or others with the same viewpoint, then it makes perfect sense. Then again, people like that would cheer if a US city was nuked, thinking we had it coming...
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Well, if you're EngineNr9, or others with the same viewpoint, then it makes perfect sense. Then again, people like that would cheer if a US city was nuked, thinking we had it coming...
Click to expand...

But we're the reason all of the people in the Middle East are oppressed. The freedom fighter on the corner with the gun, the one beating the women for showing their faces, he told me so.
 
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...


Amazing.

:disgust:

rolleye.gif
 
We have nuclear weapons. I think China should attack us to make sure we won't be able to use them. <- same logic as you're using to justify attacking Iraq.
 
Right now I think we should let him pull another stupid stunt like attacking/invading another country and then much of the world will be hesitant to condemn us for wiping him out.

If he is proven be supporting terrorist camps then all bets are off.
 
Originally posted by: bulldawg
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...


Amazing.

:disgust:

rolleye.gif
Click to expand...
because it's true?

 
We should let Saddam get his nukes and incinerate half a million people in the Middle East before attacking him. First of all, he doesn't have a delivery system that will reach the U.S. or any other Western nation. Second, after he has used his nukes we would be justified, no, obligated to stop the madman. Actually, we wouldn't have to nuke him. Five minutes after he detonated his first bomb, Israel would annihilate Iraq. That way the whole world could continiue hating the Jews just like they always have and we would be lookin' good for not using our nukes.
 
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...

So wait, we should blow up GW Bush? Or are you saying that GW is just as bad as Saddam, being a bully in the middle east, gassing his own people, running a dictatorship.

I admin GW didn't sound like a great pick to start with when he won the election. But his leadership and ablity to handle problems is what is expected of the president.
 
canada, britain, france, china - everyone - you name it is against taking military action right now. George W. 's people are retracting statements made bout pending plans to attack iraq.
 
Many of these "pundits" are the reason the foriegn policy is such a mess. And BTW, any links to these "pundits"? I guess they havent heard of prevention is better than cure.
 
Either way the Bush administration needs to present strong evidence warranting the need to "adjust" Iraq's government. This should be given to the public and to Congress so that Congress can make the final decision to declar war, which is proper under the Constitution.
 
Originally posted by: notfred
We have nuclear weapons. I think China should attack us to make sure we won't be able to use them. <- same logic as you're using to justify attacking Iraq.
Click to expand...
That's not my argument.

I just don't know how the world will be able to deal with a nuclear-armed Saddam. How will we stop him from invading all of his neighbors?
 
When Bush the father attacked Iraq, it was for the sake of US interests in the middle-east. Should Bush the son attack Iraq, it will be for the sake of Israel.....so says the Iraq ambassador to the UN, during a recent interview with Dan Rather.

I'm inclined to agree.
 
Originally posted by: Bluefront
When Bush the father attacked Iraq, it was for the sake of US interests in the middle-east. Should Bush the son attack Iraq, it will be for the sake of Israel.....so says the Iraq ambassador to the UN, during a recent interview with Dan Rather.

I'm inclined to agree.
Click to expand...

If you don't understand why he said this I feel sorry for you. The one thing that will rally every ME country together no matter what else happens is the idea that Israel may have something to gain. He said this for the same reason Iraq launched scuds into Israel during the Gulf War.

 
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: bulldawg
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...


Amazing.

:disgust:

rolleye.gif
Click to expand...
because it's true?
Click to expand...

No, because someone could be so blind. "a greater evil". Get real.

 
Well Dave, maybe, just maybe, "the idea that Israel may have something to gain", may actually be true in this instance. I know it's hard to believe, but this may well be a case of the US fighting a war with only Israel standing to gain anything at all. I know....why don't we let one of Israel's other allies fight this war for them?

You want to worry about some crazed dictator having his finger on a nuke? Worry about Israel. They have hunderds of nukes pointed everywhere. Read.... everybody is their enemy, or so they think. Should we attack Iraq, it will be without any allied support, not a very good idea.
 
Originally posted by: bulldawg
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: bulldawg
Originally posted by: unclebabar
Why should we do anything about him? There's another, greater evil, one that does have weapons of mass destruction and has absolutely no reservations about using them. His name is George W. Bush.
Click to expand...


Amazing.
:disgust:
rolleye.gif
Click to expand...
because it's true?
Click to expand...

No, because someone could be so blind. "a greater evil". Get real.
Click to expand...
Oh the irony 🙂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top