I am so confused, but this explains the 156 clowns in my car....
Oh and vote yes for mandatory human neutering/spading.
Now, we need the carbon content of 92-octane gasoline. If we
approximate the gasoline as pure iso-octane (C8H18) (see, for example,
"Fuel Chemistry" at
http://www.altfuels.org/fuelchem.html ),
then carbon represents 84% of the weight of gasoline. The density of
gasoline is about .75 gm/cc. (See, for example, the "MSDS
Hyperglossary" at
http://www.ilpi.com/msds/ref/density.html ).
One US gallon contains 3785 cc (online unit conversion at
http://www.onlineconversion.com/volume.htm ).
Thus, one gallon of gasoline contains 3785 x .75 x .84 / 1000 = 2.38
kg carbon.
ugh... i really thought 900 million people died
dropping this here for those interested.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=6021
Avg weight in KG according to wikipedia is 62.
So each person is 26 Gallons of gas. That's about 2/3 of a barrel worth of crude. So getting rid of 5/7 of the worlds population and turning them into fuel, assuming we can accelerate that process by millions of years and not waste tons of energy, we could get 3.333 Billion barrels of oil basically. USA consumes 7 billion barrels a yearNot even half.
Is that 7 billion bbls for current population? If so, it would be roughly 2 billion bbls for 2/7 the population. So 3.333 billion bbls would last 1-2/3 years
Projected casualties, return of Planet X, HAARP and lab experiment gone wrong in December 2012.![]()
Well if you try to impliment that kind of plan you'll be sure to lower the population because many people out there will kill anyone trying to euthanize their family members. I have a disabled child and if you or anyone came to euthnanize her I'd do my worst to those people.The planet is suffering from over population & there's no slow down in sight.
We need a mass euthanization of populations.
1 billion is a good number to start with.
Euthanize these groups:
Poor & homeless
Obese
Retard/brain-dead/vegetable
Drug addicts
Suicidal
I'm not sure how close that would come to 1 billion, but it would be a decent amount I would like to think.
I know there was a couple more groups I had named in discussion I had a while back.
I was thinking pretty much anyone who may be useless as to the advancement of the entire human race.
Something something let the strongest survive or whatever.
But rate it's going now, we are not only killing the planet, but our own future as a human race.
Unfortunately, human greed & selfishness is only speeding up our own destruction.
And yes, if the Kevorkian method was widely accepted & used, I would have signed up many years ago. So I am including myself in my proposition. Doubly so, as I was homeless for a time being as well.
Most of the time this comes off the wrong way & easily misinterpreted by any of the holes left open. So go cry your tears some more elsewhere.
Well that was just USA consumption Considering USA would keep population intact and do this to the rest of the world, this plan doesn't seem feasible. With that many less humans we could do it to plant life and vegetation though, which probably is orders of magnitude more carbon than human life.
Well if you try to impliment that kind of plan you'll be sure to lower the population because many people out there will kill anyone trying to euthanize their family members. I have a disabled child and if you or anyone came to euthnanize her I'd do my worst to those people.
If you don't want freedom move to Iran or China.
Well what would be more missed? Americans, or poor ass peons in Africa/India/China?
dropping this here for those interested.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=6021
Avg weight in KG according to wikipedia is 62.
So each person is 26 Gallons of gas. That's about 2/3 of a barrel worth of crude. So getting rid of 5/7 of the worlds population and turning them into fuel, assuming we can accelerate that process by millions of years and not waste tons of energy, we could get 3.333 Billion barrels of oil basically. USA consumes 7 billion barrels a yearNot even half.
We can do that right now though the ride is kind of bumpy.Alternatively, we could manufacture cars that ran on dead people.
Well if you try to impliment that kind of plan you'll be sure to lower the population because many people out there will kill anyone trying to euthanize their family members. I have a disabled child and if you or anyone came to euthnanize her I'd do my worst to those people.
If you don't want freedom move to Iran or China.
Well what would be more missed? Americans, or poor ass peons in Africa/India/China?
Fertility rates to corresponding color in chart:
78 children
67 children
56 children
45 children
34 children
23 children
12 children
01 children
![]()
Oops.
Out of Earth's seven billion inhabitants, this one added too many zeroes. Sorry, I was just in awe of our over population. D:
You could have prevented that by not inbreeding, you know.Well if you try to impliment that kind of plan you'll be sure to lower the population because many people out there will kill anyone trying to euthanize their family members. I have a disabled child and if you or anyone came to euthnanize her I'd do my worst to those people.
dropping this here for those interested.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=6021
Avg weight in KG according to wikipedia is 62.
So each person is 26 Gallons of gas. That's about 2/3 of a barrel worth of crude. So getting rid of 5/7 of the worlds population and turning them into fuel, assuming we can accelerate that process by millions of years and not waste tons of energy, we could get 3.333 Billion barrels of oil basically. USA consumes 7 billion barrels a yearNot even half.
That chart is a bit off. The US has an average of 1.3 children per household as of 2012.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf