• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lock request

After hunting for an Infohawk thread, I find that he is quoting Infohawk and the original post is not his words. Mod has modified the thread removing that point to Infohawk in the title. Still not sure what the point is (but it is in P & N, so it does not really need to make sense.) So editing to remove that suggestion to ban.

Love those baseless posts take make wild, unprovable statements than tell others to defend. Same as the old "Do you beat your wife?" "No!" "So when did you quit beating your wife" questions. Must be why I don't hang there 😉

 
He edited his post & softened it up @ my & several other poster's urging.

Respectfully suggest he realizes his mistake & should be left alone...
 
Still this was a blatant attack on a figure, not opinion, not politics, nothing just an attack.

I vote lock the thread and vacation for him, he didn't edit it for us, he edited it so he wouldn't get baned.

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
He edited his post & softened it up @ my & several other poster's urging.

Respectfully suggest he realizes his mistake & should be left alone...
Click to expand...

It was still a callout, and it was stupid, but since i have no real headroom to complain i will keep my mouth shut now.
 
I don't think it should have been locked. It's P&N, they should let things go. It's like fights in hockey; if you don't let them finish, they'll just do some nasty stickwork later on in the game.

As for the liberal bias, I think it's a bunch of hogwash. The gunslinger attack does not mean that the mods are biased. There should be a sticky at the top of P&N that states that by entering the forum you are accepting the risk of being personally attacked.
 
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Still this was a blatant attack on a figure, not opinion, not politics, nothing just an attack.

I vote lock the thread and vacation for him, he didn't edit it for us, he edited it so he wouldn't get baned.

-Kevin
Click to expand...

Edited for us? Yeah right, you get your panties in a wad if a person looks at you cross eyed, I sincerly doubt you would even venture into P&N without having a nervous breakdown by the end of an hour there.
 
FOr your information i do post in the P&N threads and i do not have any problems. SO why dont you just shut up and stop trying to start some sh!t because it is annoying!!

 
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
FOr your information i do post in the P&N threads and i do not have any problems. SO why dont you just shut up and stop trying to start some sh!t because it is annoying!!
Click to expand...
Status of sh*t: Started 😀

I suggest you make a thread demanding Red be dealt with immediately.

 
Both of you shut up. I dont know why either of you had to chime in, you went completely off topic, crapped this guys thread, and started flaming me. So cut it out.

No why the hell would i post that you guys need to be dealt with? Im not a moron (unlike someone).

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: Fausto
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
FOr your information i do post in the P&N threads and i do not have any problems. SO why dont you just shut up and stop trying to start some sh!t because it is annoying!!
Click to expand...
Status of sh*t: Started 😀

I suggest you make a thread demanding Red be dealt with immediately.
Click to expand...


LOL...

Fausto, you;re just plain :evil:

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top