Load-Line Calibration (LLC) settings are reversed. 0% means 100%

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by snowcake, Nov 2, 2012.

  1. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello,

    Recently I buyed the Asrock H77M motherboard. There is something what confuses and worrying me.
    I suppose that most of you guys(girls) know what LLC (Load-Line Calibration) is.

    The source from the quote below this line is this: http://www.overclock.net/t/1198504/...-guide-sandy-bridge-ivy-bridge-asrock-edition
    As you can read the setting 100% (level 1) gives the most compensation. That means more voltage under load. On the other hand, 0% (level 5) gives you the least compensation.

    But it appears that in my UEFI this settting mean different things.
    When I reset the bios of my motherboard to the standard settings, the LLC is set on auto. However, the auto setting mean in my case 100%!
    I can see that because the actual setting can be seen in the middle. Between the name of the setting and the setting you can manually set, even if it is set on auto. Photo below this line to illustrate:
    [​IMG]

    Testing time! (With Intel Burn Test)
    The CPU voltages at 100% and auto were both: 1.128V at load and 1.152V at idle. So the auto setting is set at 100%.
    The CPU voltage at 50% were: 1.144V at load and 1.160 at idle.
    The CPU voltage at 0% were: 1.168V at load and 1.176V at idle.

    This is bizarre. As far as I can find, the 0% setting should give less voltage than the 100% setting. However in my case it is the opposite, the 0% gives me the most voltage.


    What do you guys think? What does this mean?
    It actually worries my because I read about voltage spikes damaging your CPU if you using LLC.
    Is this a faulty bios/bug? Or is the explaining wrong at the Complete Overclocking Guide? Or Asrock changed it on purpose for some reason.
    They were also too ¨lazy¨ to put a explanation in the description of this setting in the uefi, nothing in the manual either. And the most stupid thing is: I can´t disable it!

    Is it possible that the bios suddenly becomes ¨unstable¨ or ¨decide¨ to do things right and changes the settings to the normal meanings??? So that 100% means suddenly means more voltage. If so, I have a problem.

    What do you guys think about this??
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - Load Line Calibration Forum Date
    Help me understand load line calibration. CPUs and Overclocking Dec 20, 2012
    Load line calibration (LLC) on AMD CPUs? CPUs and Overclocking Jan 16, 2012
    i5-750 and load line calibration CPUs and Overclocking Mar 12, 2010
    Still not sure about Load Line Calibration CPUs and Overclocking Jul 21, 2009
    Load Line Calibration (LLC) still a danger when running stock voltage? CPUs and Overclocking Feb 27, 2009

  3. Idontcare

    Idontcare Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    21,130
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yep, looks like the BIOS guys got their parameters reversed. Something to be wary of because they may decided to fix this in a future bios rev and all of a sudden your OC settings will be borked.
     
  4. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it possible that the bios ¨decides¨ to put the parameters the way they were meant to be? Like that the bios does this completely on its own? Or stay these settings forever? And i can safely chose 100% or auto?
     
  5. WhoBeDaPlaya

    WhoBeDaPlaya Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2000
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    205
    Yup, encountered this same bass ackwardness when I messed around with a Z77-Pro4.
    Between that and the anemic VRM/VRM cooling (for a 2500K), I returned it for a Biostar TZ77XE4 instead.
     
  6. Rickyyy369

    Rickyyy369 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    13
    LLC is trashed on my 970 Extreme4 also. I just disabled it because it would cause insane instability with even the most minor overclocks.
     
  7. Yuriman

    Yuriman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    39
    It's the same way on the Z77 Extreme4. I've found that the LLC implementation is pretty poor so for a while I left it off. After the 2.30 bios update, level 3 became my setting of choice after very expensive testing of voltages, because any setting "higher" than 3 results in overshoot during load and consequently requires a higher offset to be stable at partial loads.

    It's strange that your bios defaults to level 1, as mine chooses 5 when I select "auto".
     
  8. lopri

    lopri Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,227
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trying to determine the effect of LLC without physical devices (e.g. multimeter) is kind of like checking out an elephant in the dark. As to why these excellent Taiwanese engineers cannot spell out proper labels for BIOS settings is.. beyond me.
     
  9. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    So you get the same LLC reversed parameters as i did? What is so bad about the vrm cooling? Most boards have no vrm cooling. Or did you a extreme overclock? How was the vrm temperatures at cpu stock speed?
     
  10. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are saying that it is the same way on the Z77 Extreme4. What is the same way as my board? Since you have the correct parameters for LCC. You one chooses 5, which is of.

    In my case, when i put the setting on 100% (which is reversed so it means actually 0%) than my LLC is of right?
     
  11. Yuriman

    Yuriman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    39
    5 is least compensation, 1 is most compensation. Mine is reversed, however "auto" = 5 on mine.
     
  12. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.overclock.net/t/1198504/...-guide-sandy-bridge-ivy-bridge-asrock-edition
    A quote below from the artikel link above.
    According to this article you settings are the way they were meant to be.
    Mine settings are reversed, the 0% setting gives me the most compensation where normally it should give the least compensation.

    So, mine settings are reversed compared to you.

    You also said this:
    What do you mean by this, What is the similarity to my situation? The meanings of your settings are set the way they were meant to be. :)
     
    #11 snowcake, Nov 3, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2012
  13. Yuriman

    Yuriman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    39
    Semantics I guess. Yes, my settings are consistent with your quote. What I was trying to get across its that intuitively, level 5 would be the highest and level 1 the lowest.

    Sorry for lack of comprehension, I read this thread originally on my phone during my break at work.
     
  14. snowcake

    snowcake Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0

    If i understand you right, you are saying that the LLC implementation was pretty poor until you updated. What was so poor about it?
    So the 2.30 bios is not poor at LLC? Its better than the previous Bios you had.

    That a bios can make such a difference!
     
  15. Yuriman

    Yuriman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    39
    Level 2 and 1 still overshoot the voltage on my board with 2.30, however the minimum stable voltage no longer goes *up* when I enable LLC, making it actually useful for reducing partial load voltage.