Originally posted by: FeathersMcGraw
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Particularly when people think they're amassing savings while clipping coupons to shave $20 off their weekly grocery bill while carrying hundreds of dollars in high-interest credit card debt.
Well, if I do save $20 a week from coupons, that's over $40 a month. Assume I hit some clearance sales for clothes that I need and save myself another $40. Figure in that I buy used CD's/Videos/Games for half to 1/3 the price and I have another $20 a month. Now also include some coupons for "buy one get one free" meals and I just saved another $20.
Before you know it, those small things just added up to my monthly contribution for a Roth IRA.
While this is all true, it's still a very different mindset from saving. Coupons are designed to get consumers to spend on items that they might not ordinarily buy. While you might be saving $20 a week, you have to consider if some of those savings were on items that you might have ordinarily purchased. For example, I note that a lot of stores that have "Buy 1, get one free" specials literally give you the second item free, instead of charging each at half price. If you don't need the second item, you're effectively paying full price (even though you'll doubtless get utility from the second item).
In those cases where you may have unexpected expenses, you're relying on your bargain-hunting skills to provide the shortfall, whereas if you'd simply budgeted the savings ahead of time, you'd already have them.
I'm not trying to discourage you from your financial plans, but I'm just pointing out that while the ends are the same, the "save first" method is less-heavily leveraged than the "save while spending" approach.