Little League Pitcher Killed by Line Drive -- Parents Crusade to Ban Aluminum Bats

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Conky

Lifer
May 9, 2001
10,709
0
0
I always prefered wood bats when I played. I love the sound of a ball hit off a regular wood bat. The ping sound of metal just doesn't seem right in baseball.

 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Koing
Sports have risks. When you try to hit a ball very far out you will end up with some guys hit in the head.

Lets hit with rubber bats...

Anyway I wonder how much 'slower' a wodden bat would have made the hit to the kids head, or where ever it did to kill him. Would have survived?

Koing

IDK the numbers however there was a Real Sports ep on this not so long ago, they did the testing at college speeds for pitching and bat head speed, they determined that with a 80mph pitch and a average swing speed the ball came off the aluminium bat 2-3x faster then the wooden bat, and whats scary is that some good college pitchers can pitch over 90 mph, the ball woudl basically get back to the mound in less then 1/2 a second, reaction time being a second at best, you are just asking for trouble

and they have found it over and over again, some death, many peopel in teh hospitial with carrear ending injuries

One of the pitchers I played with two years ago had an 85-87ish fastball. In the second inning, he left one over and the batter hit an absolute rope right back up the middle. The bill hit his head (luckily it didn't hit him square), went up and was almost caught by a centerfielder. The guy ended up was out 2 weeks with a concussion, if that ball was hit about 2 inches lower, he takes it in the face and probably dies.

Was that with a wooden bat?

Reaction time is 0.1 second iirc. Anything 'faster' is guessing it and deemed not 'reaction time'. The 100m starters can react to pretty dam close to 0.1 second of the gun going off.

Koing

It was an aluminum bat and there is absolutely no chance that he could have moved out of the way. That ball came back at him like a rocket.
 

nitsuj3580

Platinum Member
Jun 13, 2001
2,668
14
81
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?

Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,020
156
106
The compromise is to make aluminum bats which are constructed to have the same characteristics as wood bats.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: kranky
The compromise is to make aluminum bats which are constructed to have the same characteristics as wood bats.

They would NEVER do that.

Wood bats would probably be much more profitable. Hell, when I was in Little League, I went through 3 wooden bats at $60 a pop in a single season. And this was at a time when most kids were using $80-120 aluminum bats that lasted for at least 2 years, not the $350 monsters you see them using now for four years.

They'd rather have only wooden bats, then aluminum bats with wooden bat properties.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
I'd like to see some hard evidence first. If it took 0.1 sec for a ball hit by an aluminum bat to make it to the mound, but 0.2 sec for a ball hit by a wooden bat, there's no way they guy would have survived anyway. Anyone have any real velocities for equivalent bats made out of wood and aluminum?

Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should be carefully analyzed and scrutinized.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
you sound like a punk :roll:

 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?

Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.


nope dont play golf either

but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: daniel1113
I'd like to see some hard evidence first. If it took 0.1 sec for a ball hit by an aluminum bat to make it to the mound, but 0.2 sec for a ball hit by a wooden bat, there's no way they guy would have survived anyway. Anyone have any real velocities for equivalent bats made out of wood and aluminum?

Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should be carefully analyzed and scrutinized.

It should simply be a matter of momentum and transfer of energy. Assuming all circumstances are equal (pitch speed, angle, placement on the bat) the aluminum bat will connect with the ball and send it off the bat with a higher velocity then a heavier wooden bat due to the difference in bat speeds. Althought its probably MUCH more complicated overall due to the types of alloys used in the bats, and the type of wood used in the bats. But I'm saying for the simplest general case.

How that translates into speed, I really don't want to figure out right now. Raynor and DrPizza are both awesome physics/math guys, they may be able to tell you.
 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
16,843
2
0
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Koing
Sports have risks. When you try to hit a ball very far out you will end up with some guys hit in the head.

Lets hit with rubber bats...

Anyway I wonder how much 'slower' a wodden bat would have made the hit to the kids head, or where ever it did to kill him. Would have survived?

Koing

IDK the numbers however there was a Real Sports ep on this not so long ago, they did the testing at college speeds for pitching and bat head speed, they determined that with a 80mph pitch and a average swing speed the ball came off the aluminium bat 2-3x faster then the wooden bat, and whats scary is that some good college pitchers can pitch over 90 mph, the ball woudl basically get back to the mound in less then 1/2 a second, reaction time being a second at best, you are just asking for trouble

and they have found it over and over again, some death, many peopel in teh hospitial with carrear ending injuries

One of the pitchers I played with two years ago had an 85-87ish fastball. In the second inning, he left one over and the batter hit an absolute rope right back up the middle. The bill hit his head (luckily it didn't hit him square), went up and was almost caught by a centerfielder. The guy ended up was out 2 weeks with a concussion, if that ball was hit about 2 inches lower, he takes it in the face and probably dies.

Was that with a wooden bat?

Reaction time is 0.1 second iirc. Anything 'faster' is guessing it and deemed not 'reaction time'. The 100m starters can react to pretty dam close to 0.1 second of the gun going off.

Koing

It was an aluminum bat and there is absolutely no chance that he could have moved out of the way. That ball came back at him like a rocket.

I see.

Do you think he would have possibly gotten out of the way if the bat was wooden?

At the end of the day he probably would have been hit either way woodenor aluminium right? All sports have risks and if you don't accept them that is crazy. You drive your car outside you could have some random guy come hit you.

If I die doing something I love then that is that. If you prevent everything that 'could' possibly be dangerous WHERE is the fun in life? Baseball probably has A LOT LESS deaths and serious injuries then other sports.

Koing
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?

Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.


nope dont play golf either

but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power

You have a 27 ounce crazy-alloy type baseball bat that you can whip around at 100mph.

You have a 34 ounce plain ol' wooden baseball bat that you can whip around at 87mph.

Using those bats, the alloy-based bat is going to send the ball of much faster than the plain ol' wooden baseball bat, ultimately resulting in a slower reaction time. What I'd like to know is if that difference is negligible.
 

AaronB

Golden Member
Dec 25, 2002
1,214
0
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
you sound like a punk :roll:


He had a good point. Care to dispute it intelligently or am I asking too much?
 

AaronB

Golden Member
Dec 25, 2002
1,214
0
0
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?

Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.


nope dont play golf either

but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power

You have a 27 ounce crazy-alloy type baseball bat that you can whip around at 100mph.

You have a 34 ounce plain ol' wooden baseball bat that you can whip around at 87mph.

Using those bats, the alloy-based bat is going to send the ball of much faster than the plain ol' wooden baseball bat.

But the real question is can someone still be killed when wooden bats are used?

 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?

Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.


nope dont play golf either

but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power

You have a 27 ounce crazy-alloy type baseball bat that you can whip around at 100mph.

You have a 34 ounce plain ol' wooden baseball bat that you can whip around at 87mph.

Using those bats, the alloy-based bat is going to send the ball of much faster than the plain ol' wooden baseball bat.

But the real question is can someone still be killed when wooden bats are used?

Which all relates to how fast the ball is coming off the bat. I'd like to see a study done comparing simulated results of each type of bat and the damage it would do to a pitcher.

I'd say the damage it would do to an infielder wouldn't be valuable, because of the increase in length from the batter giving them a greater reaction time both ways. An infielder has much more time usually than what a pitcher would have to react (I know, I've taken a few shots off of my legs and arms as a HS pitcher).
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
you sound like a punk :roll:


He had a good point. Care to dispute it intelligently or am I asking too much?

ESPN article

Mackay simply felt guilty, he says, and worried that a college pitcher would get killed because of technology he helped pioneer. A study by Thurston showed that pitchers need .375 seconds to react to a batted ball hit straight at them. While only 5 percent of balls hit by wood bats got to the pitchers' mound in that time, 60 percent of balls hit by aluminum arrived in less than .375 seconds.

Here you go.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
I'm not some 'safety at all costs' advocate, this growing movement to make life 'safe' is idiotic. Lets face it, life has risks -- and it should.

When it comes to wooden bats versus aluminum, it really comes down to this. What's the benefit of using aluminum bats? (or rather, metal alloy bats, they are not made from aluminum anymore). The only benefit is $$ savings. It's simply cheaper because they last longer. What's the cost? The cost is the potential for more players getting hurt because the ball comes off the bat so much faster, and a distortion of the game because of the increased hitting ability aluminum bats provide to inferior hitters. Given that cost/benefit equation, I'd have to say, why not go back to wooden bats?
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: tagej
I'm not some 'safety at all costs' advocate, this growing movement to make life 'safe' is idiotic. Lets face it, life has risks -- and it should.

When it comes to wooden bats versus aluminum, it really comes down to this. What's the benefit of using aluminum bats? (or rather, metal alloy bats, they are not made from aluminum anymore). The only benefit is $$ savings. It's simply cheaper because they last longer. What's the cost? The cost is the potential for more players getting hurt because the ball comes off the bat so much faster, and a distortion of the game because of the increased hitting ability aluminum bats provide to inferior hitters. Given that cost/benefit equation, I'd have to say, why not go back to wooden bats?

The benefit is not simply saving money. Tell that to a HS or College kid that sees his homeruns, average, hits, and RBIs drop significantly after switching from a metal-alloy bat to a wooden bat, and doesn't get a scholarship or drafted.

Unless it is a nationwide ban, these kids will be hampered significantly if they were to compete against players using the metal-alloy bats.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
you sound like a punk :roll:


He had a good point. Care to dispute it intelligently or am I asking too much?
he didn't have a point except to be rude and obnoxious.

A 32 inch, 29 ounce Major League Wood Bat, a "-3" differential, generates an average exit speed of 93.712 miles per hour (70 mph bat speed, 70 mph pitch speed). Many of us have heard our Legion Coaches proudly boast about their top pitcher. What pitch speed does he boast about? Watch any televised Baseball Game, College and Legion included, and check the radar readout on pitch speed. They are significantly greater than 70 mph. Much above 70 mph, wood bats break on a pitch middle and in offering protection to the defending players. Aluminum bats do not break the same if at all when a ball is hit off the enhanced "sweet spot" built into the balance point middle and in of an Aluminum Bat. The result is a "come backer" that returns before the human reaction time of .4 seconds to defend at 52-53 feet from bat-ball impact.

"WHEREAS, The Wood Bat is forgiving in that it breaks and Aluminum Bats repel the baseball at velocities that exceed human reaction time; and"

Exhibit Two (2), Page 45 describes the human reaction time, four tenths of a second (.40), a Baseball Pitcher needs to react and defend.

In a memo to NCAA membership, August 28, 1998, it was stated:

"The average time to react to a ball hit from a distance of 54 feet is approximately .4 seconds. The ball-exit velocity that matches this reaction time is 93 miles per hour. Ball-exit velocities from aluminum bats currently in use in collegiate play have been measured from 103-113 miles per hour, translating to a reaction time of .357 to .315 seconds at a distance of 54 feet. Therefore,

there is a window of time during which a collegiate baseball pitcher could be vulnerable to being struck by a batted ball." (Exhibit Two (2) page 56)

http://www.pwsdb.com/ALBB/LBB-Wood-Bats.php

this is why the parents of the deceased man have a point, and why aluminum bats especially at Legion Ball and younger levels have been under scrutiny for years.

so tell me again what daniel1113's "good point" is.




 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: tagej
I'm not some 'safety at all costs' advocate, this growing movement to make life 'safe' is idiotic. Lets face it, life has risks -- and it should.

When it comes to wooden bats versus aluminum, it really comes down to this. What's the benefit of using aluminum bats? (or rather, metal alloy bats, they are not made from aluminum anymore). The only benefit is $$ savings. It's simply cheaper because they last longer. What's the cost? The cost is the potential for more players getting hurt because the ball comes off the bat so much faster, and a distortion of the game because of the increased hitting ability aluminum bats provide to inferior hitters. Given that cost/benefit equation, I'd have to say, why not go back to wooden bats?

Actually, there are now composite resin/wood bats that are more durable than traditional wood bats. Also, the money savings from using a composite bat are debatable. Composite bats lose pop rather quickly. We shared bats on my baseball team, and using about 4 bats for the team, most of them had lost their pop half-way through the season. These are the $300-$400 bats, and we went through about 6 of them in a full season. That's about $2k in bats every year or 30+ wood composites at $60 a pop.

The bigger advantage is in the stats as BigJ said.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
I don't doubt that the aluminum bats put a little more speed on the ball. I would like to see statistics though. I know of two people, one at my jr. high and one from another school, who were both killed by line drives of a wooden bat. One hit in the head and the other in the chest.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,487
20,025
146
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
/:beer:

This thread is more exciting to watch than a game of baseball.

- M4H

It's fun to watch, isn't it? :D
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
/:beer:

This thread is more exciting to watch than a game of baseball.

- M4H

It's fun to watch, isn't it? :D

Indeed. Although I will give you this - a wooden bat feels much nicer for "Impromptu Vehicle Detailing" :D

- M4H