Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Koing
Sports have risks. When you try to hit a ball very far out you will end up with some guys hit in the head.
Lets hit with rubber bats...
Anyway I wonder how much 'slower' a wodden bat would have made the hit to the kids head, or where ever it did to kill him. Would have survived?
Koing
IDK the numbers however there was a Real Sports ep on this not so long ago, they did the testing at college speeds for pitching and bat head speed, they determined that with a 80mph pitch and a average swing speed the ball came off the aluminium bat 2-3x faster then the wooden bat, and whats scary is that some good college pitchers can pitch over 90 mph, the ball woudl basically get back to the mound in less then 1/2 a second, reaction time being a second at best, you are just asking for trouble
and they have found it over and over again, some death, many peopel in teh hospitial with carrear ending injuries
One of the pitchers I played with two years ago had an 85-87ish fastball. In the second inning, he left one over and the batter hit an absolute rope right back up the middle. The bill hit his head (luckily it didn't hit him square), went up and was almost caught by a centerfielder. The guy ended up was out 2 weeks with a concussion, if that ball was hit about 2 inches lower, he takes it in the face and probably dies.
Was that with a wooden bat?
Reaction time is 0.1 second iirc. Anything 'faster' is guessing it and deemed not 'reaction time'. The 100m starters can react to pretty dam close to 0.1 second of the gun going off.
Koing
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?
Originally posted by: kranky
The compromise is to make aluminum bats which are constructed to have the same characteristics as wood bats.
you sound like a punk :roll:Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?
Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.
Originally posted by: daniel1113
I'd like to see some hard evidence first. If it took 0.1 sec for a ball hit by an aluminum bat to make it to the mound, but 0.2 sec for a ball hit by a wooden bat, there's no way they guy would have survived anyway. Anyone have any real velocities for equivalent bats made out of wood and aluminum?
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should be carefully analyzed and scrutinized.
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Koing
Sports have risks. When you try to hit a ball very far out you will end up with some guys hit in the head.
Lets hit with rubber bats...
Anyway I wonder how much 'slower' a wodden bat would have made the hit to the kids head, or where ever it did to kill him. Would have survived?
Koing
IDK the numbers however there was a Real Sports ep on this not so long ago, they did the testing at college speeds for pitching and bat head speed, they determined that with a 80mph pitch and a average swing speed the ball came off the aluminium bat 2-3x faster then the wooden bat, and whats scary is that some good college pitchers can pitch over 90 mph, the ball woudl basically get back to the mound in less then 1/2 a second, reaction time being a second at best, you are just asking for trouble
and they have found it over and over again, some death, many peopel in teh hospitial with carrear ending injuries
One of the pitchers I played with two years ago had an 85-87ish fastball. In the second inning, he left one over and the batter hit an absolute rope right back up the middle. The bill hit his head (luckily it didn't hit him square), went up and was almost caught by a centerfielder. The guy ended up was out 2 weeks with a concussion, if that ball was hit about 2 inches lower, he takes it in the face and probably dies.
Was that with a wooden bat?
Reaction time is 0.1 second iirc. Anything 'faster' is guessing it and deemed not 'reaction time'. The 100m starters can react to pretty dam close to 0.1 second of the gun going off.
Koing
It was an aluminum bat and there is absolutely no chance that he could have moved out of the way. That ball came back at him like a rocket.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?
Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.
nope dont play golf either
but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you sound like a punk :roll:Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?
Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.
nope dont play golf either
but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power
You have a 27 ounce crazy-alloy type baseball bat that you can whip around at 100mph.
You have a 34 ounce plain ol' wooden baseball bat that you can whip around at 87mph.
Using those bats, the alloy-based bat is going to send the ball of much faster than the plain ol' wooden baseball bat.
Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: nitsuj3580
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
i know jack about baseball but how is a aluminium bat more dangerous than a wooden bat? surely its to do with the power of the guy slugging it?
Do you know anything about golf? Try hitting an old wooden driver than hit a new Big Bertha or something. BIG difference. It's the same in baseball comparing wood to the new alloy bats they have.
nope dont play golf either
but i love that noise the club makes when some guys tee'ing off. its like thunder n lightning, the sound seems to lag behind the point when he strikes the ball, and too me that club meets ball noise is an example of raw power
You have a 27 ounce crazy-alloy type baseball bat that you can whip around at 100mph.
You have a 34 ounce plain ol' wooden baseball bat that you can whip around at 87mph.
Using those bats, the alloy-based bat is going to send the ball of much faster than the plain ol' wooden baseball bat.
But the real question is can someone still be killed when wooden bats are used?
Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you sound like a punk :roll:Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
He had a good point. Care to dispute it intelligently or am I asking too much?
Mackay simply felt guilty, he says, and worried that a college pitcher would get killed because of technology he helped pioneer. A study by Thurston showed that pitchers need .375 seconds to react to a batted ball hit straight at them. While only 5 percent of balls hit by wood bats got to the pitchers' mound in that time, 60 percent of balls hit by aluminum arrived in less than .375 seconds.
Originally posted by: tagej
I'm not some 'safety at all costs' advocate, this growing movement to make life 'safe' is idiotic. Lets face it, life has risks -- and it should.
When it comes to wooden bats versus aluminum, it really comes down to this. What's the benefit of using aluminum bats? (or rather, metal alloy bats, they are not made from aluminum anymore). The only benefit is $$ savings. It's simply cheaper because they last longer. What's the cost? The cost is the potential for more players getting hurt because the ball comes off the bat so much faster, and a distortion of the game because of the increased hitting ability aluminum bats provide to inferior hitters. Given that cost/benefit equation, I'd have to say, why not go back to wooden bats?
he didn't have a point except to be rude and obnoxious.Originally posted by: AaronB
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you sound like a punk :roll:Originally posted by: daniel1113
Generally speaking, a parent on a crusade to ban an item that injured/killed his/her son or daughter has nothing benefitial to offer to society, and any legislation or rules being offered should not be taken at face value.
He had a good point. Care to dispute it intelligently or am I asking too much?
A 32 inch, 29 ounce Major League Wood Bat, a "-3" differential, generates an average exit speed of 93.712 miles per hour (70 mph bat speed, 70 mph pitch speed). Many of us have heard our Legion Coaches proudly boast about their top pitcher. What pitch speed does he boast about? Watch any televised Baseball Game, College and Legion included, and check the radar readout on pitch speed. They are significantly greater than 70 mph. Much above 70 mph, wood bats break on a pitch middle and in offering protection to the defending players. Aluminum bats do not break the same if at all when a ball is hit off the enhanced "sweet spot" built into the balance point middle and in of an Aluminum Bat. The result is a "come backer" that returns before the human reaction time of .4 seconds to defend at 52-53 feet from bat-ball impact.
"WHEREAS, The Wood Bat is forgiving in that it breaks and Aluminum Bats repel the baseball at velocities that exceed human reaction time; and"
Exhibit Two (2), Page 45 describes the human reaction time, four tenths of a second (.40), a Baseball Pitcher needs to react and defend.
In a memo to NCAA membership, August 28, 1998, it was stated:
"The average time to react to a ball hit from a distance of 54 feet is approximately .4 seconds. The ball-exit velocity that matches this reaction time is 93 miles per hour. Ball-exit velocities from aluminum bats currently in use in collegiate play have been measured from 103-113 miles per hour, translating to a reaction time of .357 to .315 seconds at a distance of 54 feet. Therefore,
there is a window of time during which a collegiate baseball pitcher could be vulnerable to being struck by a batted ball." (Exhibit Two (2) page 56)
Originally posted by: tagej
I'm not some 'safety at all costs' advocate, this growing movement to make life 'safe' is idiotic. Lets face it, life has risks -- and it should.
When it comes to wooden bats versus aluminum, it really comes down to this. What's the benefit of using aluminum bats? (or rather, metal alloy bats, they are not made from aluminum anymore). The only benefit is $$ savings. It's simply cheaper because they last longer. What's the cost? The cost is the potential for more players getting hurt because the ball comes off the bat so much faster, and a distortion of the game because of the increased hitting ability aluminum bats provide to inferior hitters. Given that cost/benefit equation, I'd have to say, why not go back to wooden bats?
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
/:beer:
This thread is more exciting to watch than a game of baseball.
- M4H
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
/:beer:
This thread is more exciting to watch than a game of baseball.
- M4H
It's fun to watch, isn't it?![]()
