Originally posted by: drag
ext3 is best for servers.
ReiserFS is completely overrated, the version 3 in the kernel is not supported well by it's creator and in version 4 is not ready for prime time.
And XFS has 'issues' due to the commodity nature of PC hardware. Anyways in the realworld the performance avantages of them over ext3 is minor.
Originally posted by: drag
![]()
Benchmarking isn't that difficult once you get a test system setup. Copy the database to the partition and then test, reformat to reiserfs then copy the database over and test it, reformat it to jfs then copy over the database to it and test... etc etc etc etc.
It shouldn't be that hard.
And also don't forget about Firebird database! It's a open source version of Borland's Interbase.![]()
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Ext3 would be the best choice overall because it's the most stable and always supported by companies like RedHat and SuSe. I would avoid reiserfs at all costs, I've just not had any luck with it in the past. I personally use XFS on a lot of my machines but nothing production at work, but I would be confident enough to use it if I thought it would make a noticable difference in performance.
Also even though MySQL isn't as good of a database as Firebird or PGSql it's the best to learn right now because it's the most popular free database.
