2-23-2013
http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoza...-pay-taxes-past-three-years/?partner=yahootix
It's Bill Clinton's Fault LinkedIn Did Not Pay Taxes These Past Three Years
Some folks are sure upset at LinkedIn. Last week the social media site released its its second 10-k since going public in 2011 and it showed $130 million in executive stock option expenses over the past three years resulted in the company paying no federal income taxes.
An article in the New York Post called LinkedIns stock option compensation a longstanding accounting trick.
But its disgust should be directed at Bill Clinton instead of LinkedIn. His first budget as president in 1993 limited the amount of executive pay that could be deducted from pretax earnings, so companies significantly increased stock options as a component of executive compensation.
If Clinton hadnt sought to limit tax deductions for executive pay 20 years ago we wouldnt have to worry so much about LinkedIns taxes.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoza...-pay-taxes-past-three-years/?partner=yahootix
It's Bill Clinton's Fault LinkedIn Did Not Pay Taxes These Past Three Years
Some folks are sure upset at LinkedIn. Last week the social media site released its its second 10-k since going public in 2011 and it showed $130 million in executive stock option expenses over the past three years resulted in the company paying no federal income taxes.
An article in the New York Post called LinkedIns stock option compensation a longstanding accounting trick.
But its disgust should be directed at Bill Clinton instead of LinkedIn. His first budget as president in 1993 limited the amount of executive pay that could be deducted from pretax earnings, so companies significantly increased stock options as a component of executive compensation.
If Clinton hadnt sought to limit tax deductions for executive pay 20 years ago we wouldnt have to worry so much about LinkedIns taxes.