LinkedIn paid no taxes last 3 years - Bill Clinton blamed

Status
Not open for further replies.

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
2-23-2013

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoza...-pay-taxes-past-three-years/?partner=yahootix

It's Bill Clinton's Fault LinkedIn Did Not Pay Taxes These Past Three Years

Some folks are sure upset at LinkedIn. Last week the social media site released its its second 10-k since going public in 2011 and it showed $130 million in executive stock option expenses over the past three years resulted in the company paying no federal income taxes.


An article in the New York Post called LinkedIn’s stock option compensation a “longstanding accounting trick.”

But its disgust should be directed at Bill Clinton instead of LinkedIn. His first budget as president in 1993 limited the amount of executive pay that could be deducted from pretax earnings, so companies significantly increased stock options as a component of executive compensation.

If Clinton hadn’t sought to limit tax deductions for executive pay 20 years ago we wouldn’t have to worry so much about LinkedIn’s taxes.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Just get rid of the corporate income tax and all of the tax subsidies to them and let it go. It's nothing but a battle anyway and then, those who constantly bitch about the US having the highest corporate rate (not burden, rate) in the world can search for a new thing to complain about as to why companies aren't moving here.
 

Veliko

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2011
3,597
127
106
If Bill Clinton is to 'blame' for it, surely that means LinkedIn also hold him responsible for it and will be giving him his fair share... right?
 

gevorg

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2004
5,070
1
0
The value of intelligence data that they pass over to the government is worth billions. That's how LinkedIn, Facebook or any other major social networking site pays their taxes to Uncle Sam.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
So either they don't pay taxes to begin with due to deductions or they don't because they skirt around it... How does the blame fall on Clinton when they wouldn't pay taxes either way?
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
It's what Republicans do.

Really, Jeff Weiner is an Obama supporter.

linkedin-obama.top.jpg


http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/jeff-weiner.asp?cycle=12

WEINER, JEFF
MENLO PARK, CA
94025
Linkedin/Ceo
$35,800 09/28/2011 P
OBAMA VICTORY FUND 2012 - Democrat
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
2-23-2013

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoza...-pay-taxes-past-three-years/?partner=yahootix

It's Bill Clinton's Fault LinkedIn Did Not Pay Taxes These Past Three Years

Some folks are sure upset at LinkedIn. Last week the social media site released its its second 10-k since going public in 2011 and it showed $130 million in executive stock option expenses over the past three years resulted in the company paying no federal income taxes.


An article in the New York Post called LinkedIn’s stock option compensation a “longstanding accounting trick.”

But its disgust should be directed at Bill Clinton instead of LinkedIn. His first budget as president in 1993 limited the amount of executive pay that could be deducted from pretax earnings, so companies significantly increased stock options as a component of executive compensation.

If Clinton hadn’t sought to limit tax deductions for executive pay 20 years ago we wouldn’t have to worry so much about LinkedIn’s taxes.

You do realize those options and gains on them were subject to ordinary income tax.
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
The reason they can deduct it is because it cost the company that much money, the cost to the company is the same as if they had given the employees money to buy the stock. The employee is tax at ordinary incone as if they were paid in cash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.