Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Obama wouldn't nominate her if she was even remotely considering ruling against Roe v. Wade.
I can't believe Rush is that gullible. Or maybe it's just another case of Obama's superior intelligence overpowering the peanut-sized brains running the GOP.
Lol..... Barry knows how to read a speech.
Well, with the death of Reagan and William F. Buckley, I'll have to agree with the current crop of GOP being essentially brainless. Probably the smartest of the living GOP politicos is Newt, but he's basically through politically (and has a less-than-stellar image due to problems in his personal life).
Even with his fairly frequent verbal gaffes, Obama still is capable of rational and concise thought. I happen to disagree with many of his policies, but can't find validity in any claims of Obama not being a very bright man.
Limbaugh is a millstone around the neck of the conservative movement, he cheapens it and furthers the divisiveness in our nation today. I listen to him off and on, just to keep tabs (O'Reilly surprised me by turning much more moderate towards the end of his radio days), and he spends 90+% of his time complaining / twisting things about the 'left/liberals', and virtually zero time extolling the logic of classical conservative political philosophy, or of any real positive things done by the GOP or conservatives.
A credible speaker for conservatism would do much better by the constituency by spending 90%+ of their time communicating the positive about their philosophy and original ideas, and (far) less than 10% picking fights with half the country.