Light-weight CRT monitors?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
don't buy online. dead pixels = bad. returns online = bad.

grow some muscles and just heft the 19" around, tis not so bad
 

RaNDoMMAI

Senior member
Dec 30, 2003
771
0
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
don't buy online. dead pixels = bad. returns online = bad.

grow some muscles and just heft the 19" around, tis not so bad

I dunno man, my NEC sb930 is pretty damn heavy, i dont want to throw my back or anything. Man i am old

heh

~RaNDoM
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: RaNDoMMAI
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
don't buy online. dead pixels = bad. returns online = bad.

grow some muscles and just heft the 19" around, tis not so bad

I dunno man, my NEC sb930 is pretty damn heavy, i dont want to throw my back or anything. Man i am old

heh

~RaNDoM

get a dolly
 

Bodah

Member
Sep 15, 2004
48
0
0
I'm gonna spend $350 on the monitor. So anyone have a serious answer to which 17" I should get?
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
the picture tube has lead or some other really dense material to absorb electrons/ radiation

then u got the glass on the front which is heavy

if u want light and portable LCD is the only option

Yup - the glass has lead in it, and it's very thick glass too. You can't skimp there, otherwise you risk implosion (the picture tube has a vacuum inside) or radiation emission.
The power supply circuitry weighs a few pounds too, and that can't really be reduced either, or else you risk overheating/burning traces, or else lousy power that'll kill components.
Best way to get a lighter CRT is to start working out more. :p