• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lifetime appointment to the federal bench to 36 year old noob

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Only the best republican loyalist should get lifetime appointments. Qualifications and experience not required.
Preferred candidate can describe why Hillary can be seen as bad and have experience reading breitbart


Republicans confirm a 36-year-old judicial nominee who has never tried a case
Senate Judiciary Committee confirms an unqualified Trump nominee, Brett J. Talley, for a lifetime appointment

MATTHEW ROZSA11.10.2017•3:53 PM

President Donald Trump's nominee to be a federal judge in Alabama was just approved by every Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee — even though he was unanimously rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association.

Brett J. Talley is 36 years old, has only practiced law for three years and made a series of partisan comments on his blog in 2016 that would normally be considered unbecoming of a judge, like referring to the Democratic presidential candidate as "Hillary Rotten Clinton, according to the Los Angeles Times. Although Talley does have degrees from the University of Alabama and Harvard Law School and clerked for two federal judges, he has never argued a motion, making it nearly unprecedented for him to be considered as a candidate for a lifetime appointment.

One of Talley's most controversial statements was a blog post in which he claimed that President Barack Obama was "about to launch the greatest attack on our constitutional freedoms in our lifetime."

He added, "The object of that war is to make guns illegal, in all forms." After a commenter wrote that Americans would "resort to arms when our other rights — of speech, press, assembly, representative government — fail to yield the desired results," Talley said he agreed with him.

When asked about these statements by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Talley said he was merely "trying to generate discussion. I wanted people to be able to use my blog to discuss issues, to come together and find common ground."

The president has directly praised Talley as being an "untold story" that "nobody wants to talk about."

"When you think of it, Mitch [McConnell] and I were saying, that has consequences 40 years out, depending on the age of the judge," Trump said in October. "But 40 years out."

One other factor that may have contributed to Talley's nomination: He was mentored by Sen. Luther Strange of Alabama and worked in the Justice Department office that chooses judicial nominees.

Talley isn't the only Trump judicial nominee who has been the subject of raised questions. Charles Goodwin, who was nominated to the federal bench in Oklahoma, was the first judicial nominee since 2006 to receive a "not qualified" label from the American Bar Association. Jeff Mateer, who was nominated to the federal bench in Texas, aroused controversy by referring to transgender children as proof of "Satan’s plan" and denounced the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage as "disgusting." John Bush, who was confirmed to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, wrote a blog post arguing that slavery and abortion were the "two greatest tragedies in our country."
https://www.salon.com/2017/11/10/re...-judicial-nominee-who-has-never-tried-a-case/
more here as well http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-judge-20171110-story.html
 
As ridiculous as it is disgraceful.

One more office the republicans have zero respect for, just like PotUS. The GOP is the party of puppets.
 
GOP can eat a dick for all their talk of "legislating from the bench!" and all their complaints of judges pushing a "liberal agenda!" I don't recall a single appointment under Obama or Clinton who was rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association...and now Trump has 3??
 
Its just goes to show you that the Republicans not only don't care about this country's welfare but they do indeed put party before country.

God damn traitors (and so are the people who blindly support them).


Can anyone tell me (who isn't white, and a multimillionaire) just exactly what it is they still call themselves and identify as a Republican? It sure isn't about making America great again and it isn't about fiscal responsibility or small government.
 
Only the best republican loyalist should get lifetime appointments. Qualifications and experience not required.

They're basically political appointments. Besides, what they're doing is constitutional, so it's on the Democrats to start picking those that are younger (as if 40 yrs is too young).

and yet you know nothing of any judge that Obama nominated.

Do what Obama did, and you get crap like Comey.
 
Ohh no! You mean future Democratic politicians may have to deal with right-wing activist judges over the next 40 -50 years? My heart bleeds for you poor little lefties. What went around comes around.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-travel-ban-hawaii-20171017-story.html

LOL, been losing the culture war for 50+ years and still going down swinging! You keep drinking those LIBRUL TEARZ! and we'll still enjoy your tinny violin swan song that you play as the GOP sinks like the Titanic.
 
I don't recall a single appointment under Obama or Clinton who was rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association...and now Trump has 3??
The ABA recalls at least 14.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/11/...-many-obama-picks-for-federal-judgeships.html

"The number of Obama prospects deemed “not qualified” already exceeds the total number opposed by the group during the eight-year administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; the rejection rate is more than three and a half times as high as it was under either of the previous two presidencies, documents and interviews show."
 
The ABA recalls at least 14.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/11/...-many-obama-picks-for-federal-judgeships.html

"The number of Obama prospects deemed “not qualified” already exceeds the total number opposed by the group during the eight-year administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; the rejection rate is more than three and a half times as high as it was under either of the previous two presidencies, documents and interviews show."

Those were asked to be evaluated. Not nominated.
 
The ABA recalls at least 14.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/11/...-many-obama-picks-for-federal-judgeships.html

"The number of Obama prospects deemed “not qualified” already exceeds the total number opposed by the group during the eight-year administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; the rejection rate is more than three and a half times as high as it was under either of the previous two presidencies, documents and interviews show."

Did you make it to the 2nd paragraph?? These were potential nominees during a judicial vacancy crisis--none deemed "not qualified" were ever nominated or confirmed.
The White House has chosen not to nominate any person the bar association deemed unqualified, so their identities and negative ratings have not been made public. But the association’s judicial vetting committee has opposed 14 of the roughly 185 potential nominees the administration asked it to evaluate, according to a person familiar with the matter.
 
True, but its pretty clear Obama slung up a lot of shit potential nominees in order to be the record holder of not qualified rejects.

Not that I trust Trump's nominees but to act like Obama didn't throw up some rotten picks.. please.
 
True, but its pretty clear Obama slung up a lot of shit potential nominees in order to be the record holder of not qualified rejects.

Not that I trust Trump's nominees but to act like Obama didn't throw up some rotten picks.. please.

#bothsides, except that one side didn't actually nominate judges that were identified as unqualified by the ABA. There is an enormous difference in the actual behavior of the administrations.
 
Back
Top