Letting Corps. Make Anonymous Unfettered Political Donations Quadrupled Contributions

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,862
6,396
126
Certainly WTP are going to do something about this. Might I suggest:

"Corporate Run Election Panels!"
"Corporatization!"
"Corporatized Politicare!"
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
And now they just voted to get rid of public financed elections. Basically they are saying "if you aren't one of us you will not compete, we will make sure of it."
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
from wiki...

"Fascists seek to organize a country according to a particular nationalist strand of corporatist values and perspectives, with an emphasis on enforcing a collectivist form of political and economic organisation based on a tightly prescribed national identity."

teaparty plus corporate campaigns = ?
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Sounds like 'cap and trade' and 'progressives' to me...thanks for their definition! :thumbsup:
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Has the world ever had fascism that did not evolve from socialism?

Oops! NM - I forgot Spain.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Color me shocked. And people wonder why politicians do what Corps want before citizens.

The sad thing is the Constitution never intended for these politicians to pick winners and losers in the marketplace.

Thank you FDR.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
The sad thing is the Constitution never intended for these politicians to pick winners and losers in the marketplace.

Thank you FDR.

Nice Strawman!

One thing's for sure- the framers of the constitution never intended for corporations to pick the winners in the realm of politics, bet on that.

But you don't mind that one bit, I'm sure.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Seems like this has been happening since the start of politics.

Now it is official that corporations are representives of the people behind it and deserve a voice.

Similar to a union
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Nice Strawman!

One thing's for sure- the framers of the constitution never intended for corporations to pick the winners in the realm of politics, bet on that.


But you don't mind that one bit, I'm sure.

Indeed. Thomas Jefferson wrote &#8220;Governments are instituted among men, and derive their just powers from the consent of the governed&#8221;.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Now it is official that corporations are representives of the people behind it and deserve a voice.

Similar to a union

And if there are international holders of those corporations? You are ok with foreign sources influencing the democracy?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
from wiki...

"Fascists seek to organize a country according to a particular nationalist strand of corporatist values and perspectives, with an emphasis on enforcing a collectivist form of political and economic organisation based on a tightly prescribed national identity."

teaparty plus corporate campaigns = ?

Is there a teaparty boogieman under your bed?

These majority of these dollars went to the Democrat and Republican parties. So what does the tea party movement have to do with this again?
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Is there a teaparty boogieman under your bed?

These majority of these dollars went to the Democrat and Republican parties. So what does the tea party movement have to do with this again?

neocons became the teaparty.
 

Kanalua

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2001
4,860
2
81
Corporations are an assembly of people. Same as a Union or any other group of organized people (hello AARP,Sierra Club, NRA, etc.)...
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
If you were a German as Nazis rose speaking out against them, you would have fellow citizens arguing against you, in favor of Nazis.

If you were a Russian under the USSR arguing against them, you would have fellow citizens arguing against you, in favor of the Soviet system.

If you were an American in the South in 1850 speaking out against slavery, you would have fellow southerners arguing against you, in favor of slavery.

If you were an American in 1775 arguing for independence, you would have fellow colonists arguing against you in favor of the monarchy.

Today, some argue to protect democracy against the threat of a corporatocracy, and we have fellow Americans arguing against us, in favor of plutocracy.

There has sadly never been a shortage of foolish people who will fight for what's bad for society, to fight for the forces of tyranny.

The power of the propaganda and media machine for the powerful, is strong.