• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Letter to Bush by Michael Moore

Gaard

Diamond Member
Deserter's Delight

By Michael Moore, AlterNet. Posted August 28, 2004.

Dear Mr. Bush,

I know you and I have had our differences in the past, and I realize I am the one who started this whole mess about "who did what" during Vietnam when I brought up that "deserter" nonsense back in January. But I have to hand it to you on what you have uncovered about John Kerry and his record in Vietnam. Kerry has tried to pass himself off as a war hero, but thanks to you and your friends, we now know the truth.

First of all, thank you for pointing out to all of us that Mr. Kerry was never struck by a BULLET. It was only SHRAPNEL that entered his body! I did not know that! Hell, what's the big deal about a bunch of large, sharp, metal shards ripping open your flesh? That happens to all of us! In my opinion, if you want a purple heart, you'd better be hit by a bullet ? with your name on it!

Secondly, thank you for sending Bob Dole out there and letting us know that Mr. Kerry, though wounded three times, actually "never spilled blood." When you are in the debates with Kerry, turn to him and say, "Dammit, Mr. Kerry, next time you want a purple heart, you better spill some American red blood! And I don't mean a few specks like those on O.J.'s socks ? we want to see a good pint or two of blood for each medal. In fact, I would have preferred that you had bled profusely, a big geyser of blood spewing out of your neck or something!" Then throw this one at him: "Senator Kerry, over 58,000 brave Americans gave their lives in Vietnam ? but YOU didn't. You only got WOUNDED! What do you have to say for yourself???" Lay that one on him and he won't know what to do.

And thanks, also, Mr. Bush, for exposing the fact that Mr. Kerry might have actually WOUNDED HIMSELF in order to get those shiny medals. Of course he did! How could the Viet Cong have hit him ? he was on a SWIFT boat! He was going too fast to be hit by enemy fire. He tried to blow himself up three different times just so he could go home and run for president someday. It's all so easy to see, now, what he was up to.

What would we do without you, Mr. Bush? Criticize you as we might, when it comes to pointing out other men's military records, there is no one who can touch your prowess. In 2000, you let out the rumor that your opponent John McCain might be "nuts" from the 5 years he spent in a POW camp. Then, in the 2002 elections, your team compared triple-amputee Sen. Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden, and that cost him the election. And now you are having the same impact on war hero John Kerry. Since you (oops, I mean "The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!") started running those ads, Kerry's poll numbers have dropped (with veterans, he has lost 18 points in the last few weeks).

Some people have said "Who are you, Mr. Bush, to attack these brave men considering you yourself have never seen combat ? in fact, you actively sought to avoid it." What your critics fail to understand is that even though your dad got you into a unit that would never be sent to Vietnam ? and even though you didn't show up for Guard duty for at least a year ? at least you were still IN FAVOR of the Vietnam War! Cowards like Clinton felt it was more important to be consistent (he opposed the war, thus he refused to go) than to be patriotic and two-faced.

The reason that I think you know so much about other men's war wounds is because, during your time in the Texas Air National Guard, you suffered so many of them yourself. Consider the paper cut you received on September 22, 1972, while stationed in Alabama, working on a Senate campaign for your dad's friend (when you were supposed to be on the Guard base). A campaign brochure appeared from nowhere, ambushing your right index finger, and blood trickled out onto your brand new argyle sweater.

Then there was the incident with the Crazy Glue when your fraternity brothers visited you one weekend at the base and glued your lips together while you were "passed out." Though initially considered "friendly fire," it was later ruled that you suffered severe post traumatic stress disorder from the assault and required certain medicinal attention ? which, it seems, was provided by those same fraternity brethren.

But nothing matched your heroism when, on July 2, 1969, you sustained a massive head injury when enemy combatants from another Guard unit dropped a keg of Coors on your head during a reconnaissance mission at a nearby all-girls college. Fortunately, the cool, smooth fluids that poured out of the keg were exactly what was needed to revive you.

That you never got a purple heart for any of these incidents is a shame. I can fully appreciate your anger at Senator Kerry for the three he received. I mean, Kerry was a man of privilege, he could have gotten out just like you. Instead, he thinks he's going to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he can do? Hell, I hear gunfire every night outside my apartment window! If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was! True-blue Americans want a president who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with doing as little work as possible!

So, to make it up to you, I have written some new ads you can use on TV. People will soon tire of the swift boat veterans and you are going to need some fresh, punchier material. Feel free to use any of these:

ANNOUNCER: "When the bullets were flying all around him in Vietnam, what did John Kerry do? He said he leaned over the boat and 'pulled a man out of the river.' But, as we all know, men don't live in the river ? fish do. John Kerry knows how to tell a big fish tale. What he won't tell you is that when the enemy was shooting at him, he ducked. Do you want a president who will duck? Vote Bush."

ANNOUNCER: "Mr. Kerry's biggest supporter, Sen. Max Cleland, claims to have lost two legs and an arm in Vietnam. But he still has one arm! How did that happen? One word: Cowardice. When duty called, he was unwilling to give his last limb. Is that the type of selfishness you want hanging out in the White House? We think not. Vote for the man who would be willing to give America his right frontal lobe. Vote Bush."

Hope these help, Mr. Bush. And remember, when the American death toll in Iraq hits 1,000 during the Republican convention, be sure to question whether those who died really did indeed "die" ? or were they just trying to get their faces on CNN's nightly tribute to fallen heroes? The sixteen who've died so far this week were probably working hand in hand with the Kerry campaign to ruin your good time in New York. Stay consistent, sir, and always, ALWAYS question the veracity of anyone who risks their life for this country. It's the least they deserve.

Yours,

Michael Moore

P.S. George, I know you said you don't read the newspaper, but USA Today has given me credentials to the Republican convention to write a guest column each day next week (Tues.-Fri.). If you don't want to read it, you and I will be in the same building so maybe I could come by and read it to you? Lemme know...
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Yes, give more coverage to a fabricator of 'documentaries' so he can throw his political weight around where it doesn't belong.

So what's the difference between Moore being at the RNC and Fox News being at the DNC???

Answer: Nothing.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Yes, give more coverage to a fabricator of 'documentaries' so he can throw his political weight around where it doesn't belong.


Last time i checked, I was living in the U.S. where everyone has the right to express their opinion.
 
Originally posted by: feralkid
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>CycloWizard</b></i>
Yes, give more coverage to a fabricator of 'documentaries' so he can throw his political weight around where it doesn't belong.<hr></blockquote>


Last time i checked, I was living in the U.S. where everyone has the right to express their opinion.

Yeah, but in politics, it is Freedom of speech, unless the other guy says something

Oh, and before someone tries to pin this one on any one side, both sides do it, a lot. You can just do a simple search on this forum and pull up plenty of people doing it who sit on both sides of the fence.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Almost as impressive as linking ann coulter articles.

Well after having to deal with Rip's posts, I think the left is entitled to one of these aren't they 🙂 ?
 
Originally posted by: KevinH
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>alchemize</b></i>
Almost as impressive as linking ann coulter articles.<hr></blockquote>

Well after having to deal with Rip's posts, I think the left is entitled to one of these aren't they <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> ?
Only if they are looking to win the "Hi I can be more of an extremist" competition.

 
Not to start an argument, but my son downloaded F911 so I watched it and it was interesting. Not as "over the top" as I was expecting it to be. He takes a lot of cheap shots, but he makes a lot of good points also. I would say it was worth a look.
 
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Not to start an argument, but my son downloaded F911 so I watched it and it was interesting. Not as "over the top" as I was expecting it to be. He takes a lot of cheap shots, but he makes a lot of good points also. I would say it was worth a look.

Indeed. A lot of people seem to be unable to see past the noise that made it entertaining to see the real insights in the movie.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>1EZduzit</b></i>
Not to start an argument, but my son downloaded F911 so I watched it and it was interesting. Not as "over the top" as I was expecting it to be. He takes a lot of cheap shots, but he makes a lot of good points also. I would say it was worth a look.<hr></blockquote>

Indeed. A lot of people seem to be unable to see past the noise that made it entertaining to see the real insights in the movie.

Haven't seen F 9/11 yet, but if it's anything like Bowling for Columbine its' critics probably totally misunderstood the movie then created Strawmen to knock down.
 
Originally posted by: sandorski

Haven't seen F 9/11 yet, but if it's anything like Bowling for Columbine its' critics probably totally misunderstood the movie then created Strawmen to knock down.

In a movie entirely consisting of straw, it isn?t difficult for one to create straw men.

While it did bring up some note worthy points, his movies do about as much for me as Ann Coulter?s ?Treason? did.

I guess I have developed immunity for Cold War propaganda over recent years....





 
yeah, but this is still pretty funny:

"Senator Kerry, over 58,000 brave Americans gave their lives in Vietnam ? but YOU didn't. You only got WOUNDED! What do you have to say for yourself???" Lay that one on him and he won't know what to do.
 
Back
Top