• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lets say you brother has a sex change operation done...

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: MrsBugi

A female is not born with breasts, either. No girl pops out of the womb with a big rack, and they remain flat-chested for the first 10-15 years of their life. It is only until she reaches puberty when hormones result in helping her grow new breasts.

Sorry MrsBugi but you're wrong. Sexual determination and differentiation is determined the moment the zygote forms.

wrong. gender is determined at about the 5th week of pregnancy and is not apparent until the 12th week (due to the presence or lack of sry -- short arm of the y-chromosome.... many times, a doctor may see what seems to be a penis, but no testes. this could be because a) the baby is hermaphroditic, b) the fetus has an abnormally large pre-clitoris, c) the fetus has xx male (sex reversal) syndrome, d) the fetus has ais (androgen insensitivty syndrome), e) there are more, but whatever....)


Nope, soon as a zygote is formed, sexual determination is set. What happens from there as a result of mutations or chromosomal assortment issues is a whole other story.

you're wrong. i don't know where you got that idea... it obviously wasn't from a relatively recent embryology textbook nor was it from a credible professor during your medical education.

oh, one more thing i forgot.... all males are failed females. undeterred by chemical and genetic interference, everyone would be a female. it's the h-y antigen (from the sry gene) that determines whether a fetus's gender will become male. if the sry gene is not present or malfunctions, the fetus will remain a phenotypic female. it happens at around the 5th week of gestation.

the real thing that determines a person's gender is the person. whether the fetus is xx, xy, xxx, xyy, xo, etc, happens at fertilization. that's different than gender assignment. "x"es and "y"s don't always function properly. furthermore, they (and the proteins they produce) do not determine our identity. it's much more complex than that. that's why gender is more accurately determined at around the 5th week.


*shakes head* Where did you learn your junk science?

what an educated response :roll:

for the first 7 weeks the fetus is undifferentiated. The imput of androgens triggers the basic organs to differentiate into male organs. Fetus with only one x chromosome (and no hormonal triggering develop external femine sex organs) lead to the concept that male hormones must be added and the basic development of the fetus is feminine. any legitimate published medical text will tell you that.

here's a website on sex development in humans - educate yourself
 
Science lessons aside...

Psychologically, I've wondered about people that want a sex change. While transgenders generally seem to ally with with the gay, lesbian, and bisexual community (both politically and socially) the mindset of transgenders seems opposite of the opinions of the other three sexual choices.

The consensus among gays, lesbians, and bisexuals is that their sexual orientation is not a choice but is due to their DNA. By that logic, they then argue that their sexual orientation is natural and not a "sin" or something to be "fixed". They want to be accepted for who they are and what they are by nature.

Transgenders on the other hand see their body as a mistake. They feel like they were born in a body of the wrong sex. They don't want to be accepted as they are, but as who they could become after radical surgery.

Given this dichotomy, who are we supposed to believe? If homosexuality is natural and to be embraced, then shouldn't transexuals embrace who they are? Conversely, if nature can be wrong and actually assign the wrong sex to a person which needs surgery to fix, then couldn't homosexuality also be a mistake of nature which rather than surgery requires a psychiatrist to fix?

Personally, I side with the GLB who simply want to be accepted as nature created them, and not so much with the T who need to change sexes to fit in. Transexuals actually do seem like more a of a psychological problem to me, needing serious help to learn to accept themselves as is rather than adding/removing a penis to feel whole. That and some of them really creep me out. Most men can't become believable women and vice versa. 😛
 
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: MrsBugi

A female is not born with breasts, either. No girl pops out of the womb with a big rack, and they remain flat-chested for the first 10-15 years of their life. It is only until she reaches puberty when hormones result in helping her grow new breasts.

Sorry MrsBugi but you're wrong. Sexual determination and differentiation is determined the moment the zygote forms.

wrong. gender is determined at about the 5th week of pregnancy and is not apparent until the 12th week (due to the presence or lack of sry -- short arm of the y-chromosome.... many times, a doctor may see what seems to be a penis, but no testes. this could be because a) the baby is hermaphroditic, b) the fetus has an abnormally large pre-clitoris, c) the fetus has xx male (sex reversal) syndrome, d) the fetus has ais (androgen insensitivty syndrome), e) there are more, but whatever....)


Nope, soon as a zygote is formed, sexual determination is set. What happens from there as a result of mutations or chromosomal assortment issues is a whole other story.

you're wrong. i don't know where you got that idea... it obviously wasn't from a relatively recent embryology textbook nor was it from a credible professor during your medical education.

oh, one more thing i forgot.... all males are failed females. undeterred by chemical and genetic interference, everyone would be a female. it's the h-y antigen (from the sry gene) that determines whether a fetus's gender will become male. if the sry gene is not present or malfunctions, the fetus will remain a phenotypic female. it happens at around the 5th week of gestation.

the real thing that determines a person's gender is the person. whether the fetus is xx, xy, xxx, xyy, xo, etc, happens at fertilization. that's different than gender assignment. "x"es and "y"s don't always function properly. furthermore, they (and the proteins they produce) do not determine our identity. it's much more complex than that. that's why gender is more accurately determined at around the 5th week.


*shakes head* Where did you learn your junk science?

that's the response of someone who knows he doesn't really know jack-****** about embryology.

since i'm getting my doctorate, i guess it would be appropriate to say that i learn my "junk science" from textbooks and credible doctors and professors.

so, i guess all well-educated people in the healthcare/medical profession who have actually studied courses like embryology, for one, are learning "junk science."

Originally posted by: BoberFett
Science lessons aside...

Psychologically, I've wondered about people that want a sex change. While transgenders generally seem to ally with with the gay, lesbian, and bisexual community (both politically and socially) the mindset of transgenders seems opposite of the opinions of the other three sexual choices.

The consensus among gays, lesbians, and bisexuals is that their sexual orientation is not a choice but is due to their DNA. By that logic, they then argue that their sexual orientation is natural and not a "sin" or something to be "fixed". They want to be accepted for who they are and what they are by nature.

Transgenders on the other hand see their body as a mistake. They feel like they were born in a body of the wrong sex. They don't want to be accepted as they are, but as who they could become after radical surgery.

Given this dichotomy, who are we supposed to believe? If homosexuality is natural and to be embraced, then shouldn't transexuals embrace who they are? Conversely, if nature can be wrong and actually assign the wrong sex to a person which needs surgery to fix, then couldn't homosexuality also be a mistake of nature which rather than surgery requires a psychiatrist to fix?

Personally, I side with the GLB who simply want to be accepted as nature created them, and not so much with the T who need to change sexes to fit in. Transexuals actually do seem like more a of a psychological problem to me, needing serious help to learn to accept themselves as is rather than adding/removing a penis to feel whole. That and some of them really creep me out. Most men can't become believable women and vice versa. 😛

being gay is just as sinful as being straight.... it's all about lust. that's all. fundamentalists (who, unfortunately, give christianity a bad name) are too damn stupid and way too bigotted to figure that out.
 
Originally posted by: thahenchman
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: MrsBugi

A female is not born with breasts, either. No girl pops out of the womb with a big rack, and they remain flat-chested for the first 10-15 years of their life. It is only until she reaches puberty when hormones result in helping her grow new breasts.

Sorry MrsBugi but you're wrong. Sexual determination and differentiation is determined the moment the zygote forms.

wrong. gender is determined at about the 5th week of pregnancy and is not apparent until the 12th week (due to the presence or lack of sry -- short arm of the y-chromosome.... many times, a doctor may see what seems to be a penis, but no testes. this could be because a) the baby is hermaphroditic, b) the fetus has an abnormally large pre-clitoris, c) the fetus has xx male (sex reversal) syndrome, d) the fetus has ais (androgen insensitivty syndrome), e) there are more, but whatever....)


Nope, soon as a zygote is formed, sexual determination is set. What happens from there as a result of mutations or chromosomal assortment issues is a whole other story.

you're wrong. i don't know where you got that idea... it obviously wasn't from a relatively recent embryology textbook nor was it from a credible professor during your medical education.

oh, one more thing i forgot.... all males are failed females. undeterred by chemical and genetic interference, everyone would be a female. it's the h-y antigen (from the sry gene) that determines whether a fetus's gender will become male. if the sry gene is not present or malfunctions, the fetus will remain a phenotypic female. it happens at around the 5th week of gestation.

the real thing that determines a person's gender is the person. whether the fetus is xx, xy, xxx, xyy, xo, etc, happens at fertilization. that's different than gender assignment. "x"es and "y"s don't always function properly. furthermore, they (and the proteins they produce) do not determine our identity. it's much more complex than that. that's why gender is more accurately determined at around the 5th week.


*shakes head* Where did you learn your junk science?

what an educated response :roll:

for the first 7 weeks the fetus is undifferentiated. The imput of androgens triggers the basic organs to differentiate into male organs. Fetus with only one x chromosome (and no hormonal triggering develop external femine sex organs) lead to the concept that male hormones must be added and the basic development of the fetus is feminine. any legitimate published medical text will tell you that.

here's a website on sex development in humans - educate yourself

the most recent studies have shown that it's possible to determine the sex of a fetus at week 5. the average is week 7.
 
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
But a lifestyle is another matter isn't it?

No not really.

Not THE only truth, maybe YOUR truth, in much the same way being female in a male body is THEIR truth. In this great big beautiful world, there are many "truths" all co-existing in harmony. Unlike your POV.
In my response "come out to you" means to admit they are gay, As a supposedly educated person, I cannot believe you are that blindered to not understand that.

If he didn't admit he was gay...how would I have known? He struggled with it for quite a while and I was actually one of the first people he talked to about it.


But saying they are disgusting, hacks, unprofessional and deserving of death, is what you have said in direct contradiction to what you say now.

I never said anyone deserved death. I warned about consequences that could occur in this world...and whether anyone likes it or not it can, has, and will happen.

I did not say that anyone was disgusting. I said that it disgusts me, which is completely different...and I wasn't talking about anyone in particular, but a possible situation that would disgust me.

Hacks was not said in an insulting way and if you took it as such then I apologize. I do believe differently than a lot of these psychologists etc. I have taken several courses on the topic (and other related ones) and though I'm not an expert on it I am neither ignorant about it.


Fortunately for us all, your problem is quite evident, since common social conventions and filters have no place in your makeup, thus allowing your duplicitous nature to ooze through and your unilateral rejection of Medical Science and Psychological advances that have allowed many people (who were once ridiculed, rejected, marginalized, brutalized and even murdered) to thrive, instead of suffering under the jackboot of discrimination and thinly veiled hate that you espouse.
I only hope that one day your life is TRANSformed by someone ( with a little secret) who can show you the EMPATHY you so surely missing.


I've never been one for following the "rules" of society. I'm different, I'm outspoken...I'm not at all politically correct, I don't give a damn about what other people think because of it either. If you actually knew me you would have a completely different opinion of me. But most of my personality is lost in translation into a post on a message board.

As for your last comment, thankfully that will never happen.
 
Empathy is one quality you seem to be in dire need of.
You seem to have plenty of youthful arrogance.
As for my last comment, the pun was emphasised for your benefit and the "little secret" I referred to could be ANYTHING. People most often keep secrets out of a fear of loss. Unless one is totally and completely honest about everything, which I highly doubt ever occurs, one must at some point acknowledge how much we depend on other's acceptance of us inspite of our faults in order to move through our daily lives.
Again, I say if YOU don't agree with Sexual Reassignment Surgery, Don't have one.
But don't think your opinion of other's having one holds much sway, nor does your opinion allow you the luxury of denigrating and marginalizing those that do want / need one.
 
Gussy it up all you want, there's no such thing as "Sexual Reassignment Surgery". You can can add or subtract fake parts all day but you can reassign somebody's sex. In the end it's still just plastic surgery, and all the hormones in the world won't change who you are. Ask Michael Jackson.
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Gussy it up all you want, there's no such thing as "Sexual Reassignment Surgery". You can can add or subtract fake parts all day but you can reassign somebody's sex. In the end it's still just plastic surgery, and all the hormones in the world won't change who you are. Ask Michael Jackson.
The correct term for the procedure is exactly that. Dumb it down all you want, but there's much more to it than being "just plastic surgery". You don't know as much about "it" as you think you do.
 
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Gussy it up all you want, there's no such thing as "Sexual Reassignment Surgery". You can can add or subtract fake parts all day but you can reassign somebody's sex. In the end it's still just plastic surgery, and all the hormones in the world won't change who you are. Ask Michael Jackson.
The correct term for the procedure is exactly that. Dumb it down all you want, but there's much more to it than being "just plastic surgery". You don't know as much about "it" as you think you do.
What are your qualifications for knowing about "it"? You know a couple of transsexuals? That's about as good an argument as the old "I know a black guy, so I know everything about blacks" argument. You said it yourself above, gender dysphoria is a recognized malady. One which should be treated with psychiatry, not surgery.
 
is there any connection between the brother's sexchange operation and you (a guy) calling yourself her 😛 ( I havent thread the thread 😉 )
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Gussy it up all you want, there's no such thing as "Sexual Reassignment Surgery". You can can add or subtract fake parts all day but you can reassign somebody's sex. In the end it's still just plastic surgery, and all the hormones in the world won't change who you are. Ask Michael Jackson.
The correct term for the procedure is exactly that. Dumb it down all you want, but there's much more to it than being "just plastic surgery". You don't know as much about "it" as you think you do.
What are your qualifications for knowing about "it"? You know a couple of transsexuals? That's about as good an argument as the old "I know a black guy, so I know everything about blacks" argument. You said it yourself above, gender dysphoria is a recognized malady. One which should be treated with psychiatry, not surgery.

are you joking? you've never heard of gender reassignment surgery?

also, homosexuality was stricken from the dsm-iv in 1975. homosexuality (or any gender congenital gender assignment defects i already named a few posts back) is not a psychological/psychiatric issue.
 
Back
Top