Let's all stop using 3DMark2000 and compare Evolva benchmarks instead. :)

[Spoooon]

=========================================================
Stats for level4Playback13.sav:

Benchmark Mode: Normal
Average FPS: 76.7

Min FPS: 22
Max FPS: 146
-------------------------------------------------------
System Info:
Evolva: v1.2, Build 944 (04-07-2000 15:18)
CPU: AMD-K7(tm) Processor 766MHz, 256MB RAM, Cache=128K/512K
Display: Radeon DDR (driver v4.13.01.2122)
OS: Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
DX: DX8 (4.08.00.0400)
D3D Device: 1024x768x32, Direct3D T&L HAL
Caps: T&L,DOT3,EMBM,3DNow(ext),MMX(ext)
Dot Bump: No
=========================================================

 

[RoboTECH]

i'll post 'em tomorrow along with the rest of the benchmarks I can find

 

[iknowcomputers2]

how'd you run the test?

 

[Spoooon]

Rolling Demo (around 30 megs)

 

[ahfung]

Deeko will come and say Evolva is just barely better than the 3DM2K crap. j/k

I've retail Evolva already, so how to run the timedemo?

 

[RoboTECH]

okay

see thread entitled "final 3dfx V5-5500 benchmarks" for my results

 

[RobsTV]

How stable is Evolva to overclocking?
I find that 3dmark 2000 works great as a stabilty testing tool when overclocking.
If Evolva is just a benchmark, then I'll stick with 3dmark 2000, unless someone can give me any reasons to download this on a 56k connection?

 

[Deeko]

lol ahfung, I don't have Evolva so I couldn't tell ya But anything's better than 3DMark so I'm all for it

RobsTV, 3DMark is a decent stability test, I'll give you that, but it is horrible as a benchmark. If you want a good all around benchmark, stability included, stick with good old Quake III.

 

[ahfung]

If you want to check stability of overclocked video cards, pick SOF. At least it works for my GeForce DDR which looped flawlessly in 3DM2000 and Q3A at 155/350, but couldn't stand 30 mins in SOF until I clocked it to 150/350.