BudAshes
Lifer
- Jul 20, 2003
- 13,982
- 3,330
- 146
Who. Frickin'. CARES. [question mark]....are as much under-estimated as the tiger is over-estimated.
Who. Frickin'. CARES. [question mark].
Even if other people care about X large cat vs. Y large cat, you are the only one who personally cares that people supposedly inflate the fighting prowess of tigers and you are the only one who personally cares that the fighting ability of leopards is similarly underestimated (supposedly).Obviously you do, or it wouldnt have botherd you to look into the thread...
Anyways...
The leopard has the home field advantage of being more accustomed to open confrontation, via hyenas, lions, baboons, gorillas and chimps, savannahs and deserts, he is the more frequent to conflicts...the tiger lives in jungles, monsoons and marsh pits. His conflicts are unheard of other than myth, since theres 100s to thousands of leopard encountering apex predators, the tiger wheather bengal or siberian, hasn't a single photo of them enteracting with wolves. They only encounter sloth bears, and they usually have the hardest time being the winner. Fighting and hunting are two different things, the tiger is a good hunter towards bovines, but fighting them:
Bull kills tiger:
![]()
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...+fight+tiger&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&prmd=ivns&strip=1
The illustration of the fight with Caesar the 700 lb bengal:
![]()
Not so much.
Even if other people care about X large cat vs. Y large cat, you are the only one who personally cares that people supposedly inflate the fighting prowess of tigers and you are the only one who personally cares that the fighting ability of leopards is similarly underestimated (supposedly).
You not only chose to dedicate your attention and focus to something no one cares about, you made it you mission to correct their assumptions about something they never cared much about in the first place.
I'm just here because I can't help staring at your horrific malfunction like I was passing a bloody train wreck or something.
FFS, why in God's name would anyone care to give a "plausible theory" about such a worthless event?!
The real reason you didn't get one: because no one cares. Duh.
Jeez, I just asked the question a few minutes ago, and you hop in like some kind of retarded bunny looking to derail the thread, I asked it because no one would have ever thought it was possible, they'd assume size and weight are factors, which it wasnt, one person appreciated the info, thats good enough for me. So ya don't care, is that why you have your own thread of similar content:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2393738&highlight=
Talk about a contradicting idiot
![]()
You were already drawing conclusions from the lack of "plausible theories" and yet it is somehow too soon for me to explain the lack of "plausible theories?" Weird.
And, yes, a disapproving parody of your threads that I also disapprove of is a contradiction. You got me there.
Now: Look up the definition of "facetious," since you clearly didn't get the sarcasm either.
No, tiger wins.
Everyone knows this.
No, tiger wins.
Everyone knows this.