• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Legislators aim to snuff out penalties for Pot use

Josh

Lifer
(CNN) -- The U.S. should stop arresting responsible marijuana users, Rep. Barney Frank said Wednesday, announcing a proposal to end federal penalties for Americans carrying fewer than 100 grams, almost a quarter-pound, of the substance.

Rep. Barney Frank's bill would radically curb federal penalties for personal marijuana use.

1 of 2 Current laws targeting marijuana users place undue burdens on law enforcement resources, punish ill Americans whose doctors have prescribed the substance and unfairly affect African-Americans, said Frank, flanked by legislators and representatives from advocacy groups.

"The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the government's business," Frank said during a Capitol Hill news conference. "I don't think it is the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time."

The Massachusetts Democrat and his supporters emphasized that only the use -- and not the abuse -- of marijuana would be decriminalized if the resolution passes. Watch Frank lay out the proposal »

The Drug Enforcement Administration says people charged with simple possession are rarely incarcerated. The agency and the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy have long opposed marijuana legalization, for medical purposes or otherwise.

Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, according to the ONDCP.

"Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science -- it is not medicine and it is not safe," the DEA states on its Web site. "Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers."

Allen St. Pierre, spokesman for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), likened Frank's proposal -- co-sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas -- to current laws dealing with alcohol consumption. Alcohol use is permitted, and the government focuses its law enforcement efforts on those who abuse alcohol or drive under its influence, he said.

"We do not arrest and jail responsible alcohol drinkers," he said.

St. Pierre said there are tens of millions of marijuana smokers in the United States, including himself, and hundreds of thousands are arrested each year for medical or personal use. iReport.com: Is it time to legalize pot?

There have been 20 million marijuana-related arrests since 1965, he said, and 11 million since 1990, and "every 38 seconds, a marijuana smoker is arrested."

Rob Kampia, director of the Marijuana Policy Project, said marijuana arrests outnumber arrests for "all violent crimes combined," meaning that police are spending inordinate amounts of time chasing nonviolent criminals.

"Ending arrests is the key to marijuana policy reform," he said.

Reps. William Lacy Clay, D-Missouri, and Barbara Lee, D-California, said that in addition to targeting nonviolent offenders, U.S. marijuana laws also unfairly target African-Americans.

Clay said he did not condone drug use, but he opposes using tax dollars to pursue what he feels is an arcane holdover from "a phony war on drugs that is filling up our prisons, especially with people of color."

Too many drug enforcement resources are being dedicated to incarcerating nonviolent drugs users, and not enough is being done to stop the trafficking of narcotics into the United States, he said.

Being arrested is not the American marijuana smoker's only concern, said Bill Piper of the Drug Policy Alliance Network. Those found guilty of marijuana use can lose their jobs, financial aid for college, their food stamp and welfare benefits, or their low-cost housing.

The U.S. stance on marijuana, Piper said, "is one of the most destructive criminal justice policies in America today."

Calling the U.S. policy "inhumane" and "immoral," Lee said she has many constituents who are harassed or arrested for using or cultivating marijuana for medical purposes. California allows medical marijuana use, but the federal government does not, she explained.

House Resolution 5843, titled the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008, would allow "a very small number of individuals" suffering from chronic pain or illness to smoke marijuana with impunity.

According to NORML, marijuana can be used to treat a range of illnesses, including glaucoma, asthma, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS and seizures.

Frank, who is chairman of the Financial Services Committee, said about a dozen states already have approved some degree of medical marijuana use, and the federal government should stop devoting resources to arresting people who are complying with their states' laws.

In a shot at Republicans, Frank said it was strange that those who support limited government want to criminalize marijuana.

Asked if the resolution's passage would change his personal behavior, Frank quipped, "I do obey every law I vote for," but quickly said he did not use marijuana, nor does he encourage it.

"I smoke cigars. I don't think other people should do that. If young people ask me, I would advise them not to do it," he said.

If HR 5843 were passed by the House, marijuana smokers could possess up to 100 grams -- about 3½ ounces -- of cannabis without being arrested. It would also permit the "nonprofit transfer" of up to an ounce of marijuana.

The resolution would not affect laws forbidding growing, importing or exporting marijuana, or selling it for profit. The resolution also would not affect any state laws regarding marijuana use.
 
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
i dont smoke, and will not smoke regardless of the legal stance, but this is a GOOD THING

REP FOR REP FRANK

The war on Marijuana = Tooooo much $$$$
 
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
i dont smoke, and will not smoke regardless of the legal stance, but this is a GOOD THING

REP FOR REP FRANK

what he said, just wonder at the timing of bringing this up during an election year.
 
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
i dont smoke, and will not smoke regardless of the legal stance, but this is a GOOD THING

REP FOR REP FRANK

what he said, just wonder at the timing of bringing this up during an election year.

Interestingly enough (to me anyway), I can't remember anything I've ever agreed with Barney Frank on. Yet the last two issues I've heard his stance on (this one and NASA funding), I've agreed with.
 
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
i dont smoke, and will not smoke regardless of the legal stance, but this is a GOOD THING

REP FOR REP FRANK

what he said, just wonder at the timing of bringing this up during an election year.

So every four years we're supposed to take a whole year off from proposing any legislation because it's an election year?
 
As a former pot head I agree with removing jail time. However, the cops are still going to treat pot smokers like the biggest criminals of all time.
 
I doubt it will pass as being a supporter of "legalizing drugs that harm society... especially the childreeeeen" (note the quotes) would look horrible on one of those negative political ads.
 
Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, according to the ONDCP.

And tobacco isn't? 😕

Honestly I have no clue why marijuana is still illegal. I don't smoke it or anything else, but if we're going to make cigarettes legal, why not legalize MJ too? I guarantee the war on dope has cost taxpayers 10x as much money as the amount of damage marijuana would do to society if it were completely legal.

Furthermore, it is utterly ridiculous that the federal government still goes after all marijuana users even when some states allow it for medical use. The federal government needs to respect state laws.
 
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.

this isn't about that. this is about federal govt. regulating something that belongs in the states hands.
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.

"Hey man, wanna go grab some tacos and listen to bob marley?"
 
"Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science -- it is not medicine and it is not safe," the DEA states on its Web site. "Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers."
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Oh, man that's good stuff!
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
"Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science -- it is not medicine and it is not safe," the DEA states on its Web site. "Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers."
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Oh, man that's good stuff!

I wonder what they were smoking when the wrote that... 🙂
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
"Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science -- it is not medicine and it is not safe," the DEA states on its Web site. "Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers."
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Oh, man that's good stuff!

I find that quote especially hilarious considering caffeine, alcohol, and nicotine can all be "addictive" in their own right (whether mentally or physically).
 
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.

"Hey man, wanna go grab some tacos and listen to bob marley?"

and cops have that tongue scraper thing in addition to batons that can detect chemicals in the air.

the tongue scraper is not too pleasant, it's like a disposable razor without a blade.
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.

this isn't about that. this is about federal govt. regulating something that belongs in the individuals hands.

fixed
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Once there is a test which can determine if one is under the influence of marijuana, I will fully support the decriminalization and perhaps the legalization of it. Until then, I will not support it.

CIA "How to know if you are under the influence of Illegal Substances" document lists:
* Cotton Mouth
* Life Seems Pretty Good
* You Genuinely Enjoy Night Ranger
 
Back
Top