Legendary

SneakyStuff

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2004
4,294
0
76
Legendary the game

I saw this on a top 50 countdown for games in 2008 or being released soon and it was up in the top 10, "god of war meets call of duty 4" from what I've seen it looks very cool, they said its due for a Q3 2008 release date. Anyone heard anything about this game? Really peaked my interests! :)
 

wart

Member
Jun 26, 2008
136
0
0
That looks pretty awesome. I just wish it would have some sort of multiplayer =(
 
Dec 27, 2001
11,272
1
0
Originally posted by: wart
That looks pretty awesome. I just wish it would have some sort of multiplayer =(

Yeah, uh, it says right on the synopsis that there is multiplayer and you can be either a human or some of the monsters.
 

wart

Member
Jun 26, 2008
136
0
0
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: wart
That looks pretty awesome. I just wish it would have some sort of multiplayer =(

Yeah, uh, it says right on the synopsis that there is multiplayer and you can be either a human or some of the monsters.

Oops :eek: I completely missed that.

Does anyone know a release date? It's supposed to be a summer release / Q3 2008. Don't games this close to their designated release frame have more specific dates?
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Looks.... very much so like if they put Half Life 2 and Underworld in a blender.

Some of the screenshots are just like in Halflife2

not that its bad :)
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
This was originally called "Legendary: The Box", and while I'm glad they changed its name... I really don't see anything about it that makes me interested in trying it. The trailer Marc posted is a good example... looks like a lot of backpedaling and firing at charging monsters. whoopie!
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
Here's one of the latest trailers: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35573.html

Tell me if you still like it. Somehow it dissapoints me a bit.

I agree. It looks to have potential, but there's something off about it. The gameplay looks kinda generic. Sure you're shooting gryffons and minotaurs, but it doesn't seem like its really any different than shooting things in the average mediocre FPS these days.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
I've been reading about and watching trailers for this game for a while now and with every bt of new information that gets released my interest wanes a little more.

The initial idea seemed cool, in the early trailers (kind of Hellgate/Painkiller-ish, though hopefully more the latter than the former) but now it just seems to have become like any other shooter.

KT
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
I've been reading about and watching trailers for this game for a while now and with every bt of new information that gets released my interest wanes a little more.

The initial idea seemed cool, in the early trailers (kind of Hellgate/Painkiller-ish, though hopefully more the latter than the former) but now it just seems to have become like any other shooter.

KT

Yeah, the trailer doesn't really do anything for me. Looks almost like a less original Painkiller ... might be entertaining for an hour or so, but beyond that, dunno.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Ok, I clicked the US link on the page and at the point it asked for my birthday I just hit enter without changing the date and it denied me. I cleared my cookies in Firefox and tried again and I'm still denied with no option to change my birthday. I tried Internet Explorer on the same machine and I'm denied with that as well. I tried on my laptop and could enter my birthday again. So it's not using cookies, and it's not using my IP address, so my question is how the f*ck does it know?

Ok, nvm, it left something in my Flash cache. Flushed it for that site and I get the date prompt again.
 

geoffry

Senior member
Sep 3, 2007
599
0
76
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Ok, I clicked the US link on the page and at the point it asked for my birthday I just hit enter without changing the date and it denied me. I cleared my cookies in Firefox and tried again and I'm still denied with no option to change my birthday. I tried Internet Explorer on the same machine and I'm denied with that as well. I tried on my laptop and could enter my birthday again. So it's not using cookies, and it's not using my IP address, so my question is how the f*ck does it know?

Ok, nvm, it left something in my Flash cache. Flushed it for that site and I get the date prompt again.

That just sounds neat, lol.
 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
Worst thing is, during a press presentation this game reminded me of Turning Point: Fall of Liberty, and that game was pure crap. This game has the same devs, and is equally crap, judging from the 1-2 hours I played it. I even tried the SP, and it was in no way exciting. This game can't compete with Crysis, Far Cry 2, or even Fallout 3. Budget shooter, and that's it.
 

AVP

Senior member
Jan 19, 2005
885
0
76
Anyone else notice how the gun textures did not seem to fit in with the game? Maybe it was just me...can't seem to find a screenshot to verify...hmm will have to watch again I guess
 

Zenoth

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2005
5,202
216
106
It looks interesting, I'm downloading the demo right now, thanks for the heads up, some games need more advertising out there.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,295
12,857
136
it's not bad. can't say based off of the demo that it's anything really special. they just kinda threw you in there without any explanation.
it might not be bad to pick up at $20 or something, but i can't say i'd spend $50 on it.
 

Zenoth

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2005
5,202
216
106
I just finished the demo, and I can say that it's decent, but nothing more. It looks strangely bad for a Unreal Engine 3.0 game, UTIII certainly looks better, even on Consoles, but graphics put aside I like the animations especially on the Werewolves walking on walls and climbing their way to get fairly dumb (probably on purpose) A.I enemies. It does feel like a Console port, it is one indeed, I know, but nothing was changed from the Console versions expect for the controls.

Like Fenixgoon said, I might be willing to spend something along the lines of $15 or $20 for it, just to get another FPS game in my collection, since I do appreciate some of the moments in the demo (especially the Minotaur fight, it was nice), but I wouldn't pay more for it, it doesn't feel "epic" like the web-site says it is. Maybe because the demo didn't revealed even a percent of the complete game, but it's not my job to make a convincing demo. But in the end, it's decent, I've seen much, much worse than that game, especially for a Console port.

I just don't like how you're being "told" where the weapons are by making them glow constantly. I mean some developers today still consider Console gamers stupid, or else they wouldn't have done it, I cannot think of a logic reason to make chains on a door glow to "tell" the gamer "hey, look at me, I'm a chain with a lock, I'm glowing because you wouldn't know otherwise that if you don't shoot me this door won't open and you'd think that the game ends right here without any CGI's nor credits", yeah... ok. Why not telling me how the end ends from the beginning, maybe that would help as well. Stop making weapons and door switches glow you silly developers.
 

Liet

Golden Member
Jun 9, 2001
1,529
0
0
Originally posted by: ZenothStop making weapons and door switches glow you silly developers.
I think it's less of a "you console players are dumb" thing, and more of a game development holdover from the days when low TV resolutions made finding weapons/items difficult due to the poor detail.

Personally, I think console players are dumb, though. In general. ;)

 

Zenoth

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2005
5,202
216
106
Originally posted by: Liet
Originally posted by: ZenothStop making weapons and door switches glow you silly developers.
I think it's less of a "you console players are dumb" thing, and more of a game development holdover from the days when low TV resolutions made finding weapons/items difficult due to the poor detail.

Personally, I think console players are dumb, though. In general. ;)

Well I started playing video games on Consoles before PC starting with the NES and Master System, passing by the SNES, Genesis, GameBoy, GameGear, PS, Saturn... and so on, until the original XBOX, and the number of games I've played in which obvious "puzzle" clues were glowing or other items did so were extremely rare, and when I did find such a game I felt humiliated.

It's like telling me where to go with a pointer on a radar for my next quest/mission in any games with such quests and missions, I find that extremely stupid, and they do it in the name of "convenience" or I don't know what else, like Oblivion, or Morrowind, or Fallout 3, hey, let's create a big open-ended world to explore, but let's allow players to fast travel making the size of the game world practically futile, and let's tell them where to go next so that the next thing they can do is to complain how short the game was.

I never felt dumb as a Console gamer, and Consoles have received such a negative view from supposedly more mature PC gamers, but it's strange, when I play TF2 and Left 4 Dead and UTIII and Crysis Warhead on-line I certainly don't feel like PC gamers are that much mature, do I even have to mention Counter-Strike? That one game that you would swear would be on Consoles only? I've heard 10 years-olds playing that damn thing and I'm not exaggerating to give myself the last word, it's true, immature and players below the ESRB rating play lots of PC games today.

But anyway... it's getting off-topic.

I just think that Legendary feels too much of a Console port, and that the decision by the developers to make things glow to make the game easier and themselves probably thinking that it's actually a good idea only makes me wonder who's really stupid with Consoles, the immature players or the illogical developers? Probably only God knows for sure, and even then... yeah developers over time probably didn't helped things with Console games. The thing is I don't remember in my 15 years of playing games on Consoles ever demanding to developers to make things glow in games because I couldn't find that stupid lock to destroy in the last adventure game I couldn't finish.

It's the developers' fault, they are paranoid about making things fast-food. Now, rant aside, I think that the Legendary's demo is decent, it's just "ok" you know, nothing much to be wowed about, nothing to be wowed about in fact, it's just alright, could be fun one or two times, for $15 I would probably get it.
 

Kyanzes

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,082
0
76
Ouch. That had to hurt. Legendary got 3.5 on Gamespot. That's freaking low.


The Good:
- Agile werewolves throw crates at you.

The Bad:
- Ugly
- Story doesn't make any sense
- Poor level design brimming with cliches
- It's easy to get hung up in the tight, cluttered environments.

:D

I was so looking forward to this game.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,295
12,857
136
Originally posted by: Kyanzes
Ouch. That had to hurt. Legendary got 3.5 on Gamespot. That's freaking low.


The Good:
- Agile werewolves throw crates at you.

The Bad:
- Ugly
- Story doesn't make any sense
- Poor level design brimming with cliches
- It's easy to get hung up in the tight, cluttered environments.

:D

I was so looking forward to this game.

i thought the graphics were nice. im not really a graphics whore though.
based on the demo, i don't know what story there is. that was probably the most disappointing thing.

i also disliked the glowing usables. and wtf is up with holding E for crap? if i need to bypass a panel, why are you making me hold E when there's no point to delaying me? are you hoping to add 10 seconds of gameplay for every panel i encounter?

and by you i mean the dev :p
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
I liked the 5-10 minute demo of this one. I would probably pick it up @ $20, but not @ $50.