Lebron James is a Bitch

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Uhhh??? The only reason the Lakers won last year was because Perkins was injured. In all honesty the Celtics will have an even better team this coming season. Unless they get another injury, I don't see how the Lakers can beat them. At 100% the Celt's are a better team. The only reason they lost 3 seasons ago was because of an injury. But 2 seasons ago they were at 100% and guess what? They tore up the Lakers.

You Mad? Lakers won because the Celtics are as ancient as the Spurs.

Lakers 2 in a row baby!
 
Apr 17, 2005
13,465
3
81
That dude should never attempt a song, muchless with a guitar.

Cleveland is surely looking like the scorned b!tch in this all...at some point they need to get over it.

That said, a song like this could have been much funnier if it was done by someone with some actual skills to any degree.

that dude is actually a very funny comedian. he also has some other funny songs. he has a ton of videos on youtube under different user names.

here is one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngRq82c8Baw
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,085
1,245
126
You Mad? Lakers won because the Celtics are as ancient as the Spurs.

Lakers 2 in a row baby!

Mad? LOL I'm not mad the Lakers won because the Celt's Center was out, it sucks Perkin injured himself because I did want my team to win. But when the Celtics were at 100% they beat the Lakers. Take away the 2 injuries they've had in the past 3 seasons. And it would almost certainly be 3-0 Celtics, and at worst 2-1 Celtics. You probably will argue this because you're a nutt hugger. But I watched the Celtics almost do it twice while missing a key player. I don't really give the Lakers credit for beating a team that was down their center, and 2 years before that a star player. Yes they won, but they didn't beat a complete team. And it's been proven when the Celtics have their best players in they win. I suppose Lakers could get lucky and Celtics could have another one of their important players out due to injury in the finals. But outside of that they're not beating them.
 

KeypoX

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2003
3,655
0
71
lol Im excited to see this heat team. But im not a Cleveland fanatic.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Mad? LOL I'm not mad the Lakers won because the Celt's Center was out, it sucks Perkin injured himself because I did want my team to win. But when the Celtics were at 100% they beat the Lakers. Take away the 2 injuries they've had in the past 3 seasons. And it would almost certainly be 3-0 Celtics, and at worst 2-1 Celtics. You probably will argue this because you're a nutt hugger. But I watched the Celtics almost do it twice while missing a key player. I don't really give the Lakers credit for beating a team that was down their center, and 2 years before that a star player. Yes they won, but they didn't beat a complete team. And it's been proven when the Celtics have their best players in they win. I suppose Lakers could get lucky and Celtics could have another one of their important players out due to injury in the finals. But outside of that they're not beating them.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=SummerForecast10-NBAChamps


Celtics beat Lakers without Bynum. They aren't making it to the finals again anyway, they are done.

5 rings for Kobe, going on 6. I hope that keeps you up at night.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,085
1,245
126
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=SummerForecast10-NBAChamps


Celtics beat Lakers without Bynum. They aren't making it to the finals again anyway, they are done.

5 rings for Kobe, going on 6. I hope that keeps you up at night.

this is a quote from your very own link

If they had had Kendrick Perkins and a healthy Rasheed Wallace in Game 7, I think they would have won at Staples.

The only error in his statement is the word think, if Perkins hadn't been injured there probably wouldn't even had been a game 7. And if it had gone to game 7 there's no thinking about it, the Celtics would have took it.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
this is a quote from your very own link

If they had had Kendrick Perkins and a healthy Rasheed Wallace in Game 7, I think they would have won at Staples.

The only error in his statement is the word think, if Perkins hadn't been injured there probably wouldn't even had been a game 7. And if it had gone to game 7 there's no thinking about it, the Celtics would have took it.

If my aunt had balls she would be my uncle.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,085
1,245
126
If my aunt had balls she would be my uncle.

You're right, the Celtics missing key players had NOTHING to do with super close loses in the finals, not once but twice. What the fuck was I thinking? KG wasn't needed 3 seasons ago and Perkins being out made no difference. Hell I bet they played better without ether, I'm sure they would have gotten swept in both finals if KG & Perkins had been in. The Lakers obviously won because they're just amazing and totally unstoppable.

Thanks for helping me to see the light.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Uhhh??? The only reason the Lakers won last year was because Perkins was injured. In all honesty the Celtics will have an even better team this coming season. Unless they get another injury, I don't see how the Lakers can beat them. At 100% the Celt's are a better team. The only reason they lost 3 seasons ago was because of an injury. But 2 seasons ago they were at 100% and guess what? They tore up the Lakers.

Celtics were close, but to automatically give Game 7 to the celtics if they had Perkins is a ridiculous assumption.

And this year, Celtics don't stand a chance without Tony Allen in addition to their mostly same roster +1 more year of bad aging knees and ankles. And let's not forget their bench...oops, forgot they don't have one (and this includes nate robinson and for the most part shaq.)
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
that dude is actually a very funny comedian. he also has some other funny songs. he has a ton of videos on youtube under different user names.

here is one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngRq82c8Baw

Lol! Ok, I'll lighten up. :D

Seeing that, I think he himself could have done a better job with the LBJ song, but good to see he's not just a cheap wannabee-funny opportunist creating a pro-cleveland kiss-@ss song.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Lol! Ok, I'll lighten up. :D

Seeing that, I think he himself could have done a better job with the LBJ song, but good to see he's not just a cheap wannabee-funny opportunist creating a pro-cleveland kiss-@ss song.

that was a pretty fucking funny song...

afaik, he was downtown cleveland when he sang that song... "Brothers" is a fairly well known bar in downtown cleveland...