leary about getting an AMD after reading this

minofifa

Senior member
May 19, 2004
485
0
0
hey everybody,
sorry if this has been asked but I have to ask to be sure that i don't waste 400 buck on a new processor. I am getting a computer to use stricktly as a DAW (no internet or word processing or games or anything like that) just Music editing. I use cakewalk sonar for my production but a developer there posted the following:

SP2 adds a security feature called Data execution prevention (DEP) aka "NX memory" (NX = no execute). The idea is that viruses often enter a computer by coming in via a data buffer, and then injecting code into the data buffer and running that code. SP2 locks that down by only allowing true code pages to be run.

On later model AMD chips (the AMD 64 in particular), NX has hardware support. The chip itself will trigger an exception if a virus tries to run in data memory.

SONAR 3's (and earlier generations) mix engine uses self-generating/modifying code, which is equivalent to code running in data memory. After installing SP2, running SONAR may cause XP to warn about a Windows security problem.

should i stay away from AMD to avoid this problem? i will not be installing SP2 either. i have a feeling there will be problems with several of of my other plug ins and programs as well....
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
If you don't install SP2 then you don't have NX support at all. IMO, hardware NX support is a very good reason to buy an Athlon 64 and shouldn't discourage you from getting one in any way.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,945
4,535
126
Intel will have the same thing at the end of this year. Thus are you going to avoid both AMD and Intel?

Just don't run SP2 and you'll have no problem.
 

minofifa

Senior member
May 19, 2004
485
0
0
ohhh ok, i thought that the NX feature in the AMD cpu would be working even without SP2. I hope that we are not forced to instal SP2 in order to get later updates (as i'm sure we probably will be). There must be other people in a similar situation as me who won't benefit from this feature. It seems like a good idea for stopping viruses but it seems like a lot of headaches are going to arise from it.
 

neutralizer

Lifer
Oct 4, 2001
11,552
1
0
Originally posted by: minofifa
hey everybody,
sorry if this has been asked but I have to ask to be sure that i don't waste 400 buck on a new processor. I am getting a computer to use stricktly as a DAW (no internet or word processing or games or anything like that) just Music editing. I use cakewalk sonar for my production but a developer there posted the following:

SP2 adds a security feature called Data execution prevention (DEP) aka "NX memory" (NX = no execute). The idea is that viruses often enter a computer by coming in via a data buffer, and then injecting code into the data buffer and running that code. SP2 locks that down by only allowing true code pages to be run.

On later model AMD chips (the AMD 64 in particular), NX has hardware support. The chip itself will trigger an exception if a virus tries to run in data memory.

SONAR 3's (and earlier generations) mix engine uses self-generating/modifying code, which is equivalent to code running in data memory. After installing SP2, running SONAR may cause XP to warn about a Windows security problem.

should i stay away from AMD to avoid this problem? i will not be installing SP2 either. i have a feeling there will be problems with several of of my other plug ins and programs as well....

that's a GOOD thing. not a bad thing.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Yes, it is a good thing. As in it was designed to do that. Why don't you want NX minofifa? Most of us can't wait to get it....
 

minofifa

Senior member
May 19, 2004
485
0
0
that's a GOOD thing. not a bad thing

no its not, cause when i am recording and that message pops up and my track is interrupted, i will snap because that was the only good take i will ever do. Well its not that severe but still i don't want to have audio drop outs when recording everytime that sonar violates that NX thingy.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
I wonder if SP2 would be ok in this situation(don't really know) with the Security Settings on Low. That said, has anyone actually tested this software under these conditions yet to see what happens? Kinda sounds like it is just a warning of "possible" results and not an actually known issue.
 

lakefire

Member
Jul 26, 2004
25
0
0
If you don't have internet don't install any security stuff and don't keep the computer connected to the internet. You have nothing to worry about. Also don't download SP2 because thats' the main focus of the SP.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,115
16,027
136
XP SP2 is not out yet, and even if it was, you don't have to install it ! Then you have no problem. Or do this:
To prevent XP stopping SONAR, go to the system control panel and find the tab where DEP is configured. In there you are allowed to specify applications for which NX can be shut off. If you are using SONAR 3 you will need to add SONARPDR.EXE or SONARSTD.EXE to the list. Choose the appropriate name for the executable file.
 

Carbonadium4

Senior member
Apr 28, 2004
381
0
0
Originally posted by: Markfw900
XP SP2 is not out yet, and even if it was, you don't have to install it ! Then you have no problem. Or do this:
To prevent XP stopping SONAR, go to the system control panel and find the tab where DEP is configured. In there you are allowed to specify applications for which NX can be shut off. If you are using SONAR 3 you will need to add SONARPDR.EXE or SONARSTD.EXE to the list. Choose the appropriate name for the executable file.

Thats weird, I hope my co-worker didn't download a beta and let us to that its a release.. lol..

Released What a big ass file.. 272 Megs... its like rewriting part of the OS :)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=049C9DBE-3B8E-4F30-8245-9E368D3CDB5A&displaylang=en
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,055
880
126
I am sure AMD will have some sort of patch to fix this. I wouldnt worry.
 

neutralizer

Lifer
Oct 4, 2001
11,552
1
0
Originally posted by: Carbonadium4
Originally posted by: Markfw900
XP SP2 is not out yet, and even if it was, you don't have to install it ! Then you have no problem. Or do this:
To prevent XP stopping SONAR, go to the system control panel and find the tab where DEP is configured. In there you are allowed to specify applications for which NX can be shut off. If you are using SONAR 3 you will need to add SONARPDR.EXE or SONARSTD.EXE to the list. Choose the appropriate name for the executable file.

Thats weird, I hope my co-worker didn't download a beta and let us to that its a release.. lol..

Released What a big ass file.. 272 Megs... its like rewriting part of the OS :)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=049C9DBE-3B8E-4F30-8245-9E368D3CDB5A&displaylang=en

It's actually 266 MB and because it is cumulative, it includes sp1 updates. If you have been doing window updates, you shouldn't need sp2 except for the firewall, av, and nx bit.
 

txxxx

Golden Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,700
0
0
Originally posted by: dullard
Intel will have the same thing at the end of this year. Thus are you going to avoid both AMD and Intel?

Just don't run SP2 and you'll have no problem.

Nevermind : Markfw900 covered what I was saying.
 

dmw16

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2000
7,608
0
0
Im sure you will have to get SP2 @ some point. But I am also sure someone will put out a fix for the problem you are worried about. Stall getting SP2 as long as possible then when you have to, hope there is a fix. But dont hestitate to get an A64, they are great CPUs.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,574
10,211
126
I really wouldn't worry about either issue. I don't have a system with NX features yet, but I think that I've read that you can actually turn off that feature, either on a per-program, or system-wide basis. Actually, I think I read about that on an emulation forum, since there are quite a few emulators that use dynamic code generation, which could also potentially trigger the NX-bit feature, if there was no way to disable it. I wouldn't be worried, it's actually an excellent feature to prevent viruses and worms from getting into a system through buffer overflows.
 

NFactor

Member
Sep 21, 2003
153
0
0
The NX bit feature actually wouldn't give you any trouble. If you run SP2 and have a compatible processor you will see that there are two options for NX protection:
"Turn on DEP for essential Windows programs and services only" and "Turn on DEP for all programs and services except those I select". So basically if it is on the first setting it shouldn't prevent your audio program from working and if it is on the second you can tell Windows to not use NX protection on that particular program.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,783
31,801
146
I thought Apple was great for this type of work?
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: NFactor
The NX bit feature actually wouldn't give you any trouble. If you run SP2 and have a compatible processor you will see that there are two options for NX protection:
"Turn on DEP for essential Windows programs and services only" and "Turn on DEP for all programs and services except those I select". So basically if it is on the first setting it shouldn't prevent your audio program from working and if it is on the second you can tell Windows to not use NX protection on that particular program.
There's also a software DEP for non-NX chips that can be turned on\off\exceptions made.