Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Or just like the lawyer said, prolong it as long as possible.....in hope for settlement (I sure hope not!).
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Or just like the lawyer said, prolong it as long as possible.....in hope for settlement (I sure hope not!).
i doubt there is going to be a settlement. they already offered $12k and he refused.
Originally posted by: NeuroSynapsis
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Or just like the lawyer said, prolong it as long as possible.....in hope for settlement (I sure hope not!).
i doubt there is going to be a settlement. they already offered $12k and he refused.
He also got offered by a korean suit company to be flown out there and have a custom suit made for him and refused. He should diaf
Originally posted by: NeuroSynapsis
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Originally posted by: Syrch
it really is one thing to throw up a law suit as a scare tactic but to take it this far is just retarded. I wonder if he is simply doing this for pride at this point.
Or just like the lawyer said, prolong it as long as possible.....in hope for settlement (I sure hope not!).
i doubt there is going to be a settlement. they already offered $12k and he refused.
He also got offered by a korean suit company to be flown out there and have a custom suit made for him and refused. He should diaf
Originally posted by: waggy
http://www.myfoxdc.com/myfox/p...Code=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A judge who ruled in favor of a dry cleaner that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants has denied a request to reconsider the verdict, ruling Monday that the plaintiff failed to present "any new argument" in the case.
Roy L. Pearson argued last week that District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff failed to address his legal claims when she ruled that the business owners did not violate the city's consumer protection law by failing to live up to his expectations of a "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store.
"The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration reargues matters that already were presented in his pretrial statement, his trial brief, and his arguments at trial," Bartnoff wrote Monday.
Pearson, a local administrative law judge, can still take the matter to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. He did not immediately respond to an e-mail from The Associated Press seeking comment Monday.
The case, which drew international attention, began in 2005 when Pearson brought several suits for alterations to Custom Cleaners.
A pair of pants from one suit was missing when he requested it two days later. A week later, the store owners said the pants had been found, but Pearson denied that they were his and decided to sue.
Pearson originally sought $67 million in his lawsuit, which was based on a strict interpretation of the city's consumer protection law. The suit also included damages for inconvenience, mental anguish and attorney's fees for representing himself.
(Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
woot! denied again!
wonder if this is the end of it?
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: hbui
Even thought the couples dropped their claim for the court fees, this dickhead still presses on...LINK
yeah..you bumped a dead thread for something that was posted in this thread already? sheesh
Originally posted by: Ig
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: hbui
Even thought the couples dropped their claim for the court fees, this dickhead still presses on...LINK
yeah..you bumped a dead thread for something that was posted in this thread already? sheesh
The cleaners withdrew the motion for the court fees yesterday. So unless someone is going back and editing month old posts, it's new information.
