• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Law Question

Vinney

Member
If someone is convicted for the sale of cocaine and given a 3 year sentence, what is the earliest time that person could possibly be released?
 
Well it's not a specific state. It's a hypothetical situation based in a made up state, so no particular state jurisdiction would be controlling. What I really want to know is if it's feasible for that person to be released in 6 months or less.
 
Originally posted by: Vinney
Well it's not a specific state. It's a hypothetical situation based in a made up state, so no particular state jurisdiction would be controlling. What I really want to know is if it's feasible for that person to be released in 6 months or less.

That would be a "revolving door" jurisdiction. In today's political climate, 6 months on a 3 year sentence seems unlikely - especially for a drug offense.
 
I just noticed your registration date, you registered nearly a year ago and just *now* you make your first posts? Odd one aren't you 😛
 
Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007
I just noticed your registration date, you registered nearly a year ago and just *now* you make your first posts? Odd one aren't you 😛

Maybe he just got released for his LAST bust, and is thinking about "stepping up to the BIG TIME"? 😉
 
Originally posted by: Vinney
If someone is convicted for the sale of cocaine and given a 3 year sentence, what is the earliest time that person could possibly be released?

Well...lets assume a 1:1 good time ratio. That means that for every day you behave, you get 1 day off your sentence. That would be 50% at most, which would mean at LEAST 1.5 years for a 3 year sentence. However, states vary, and since you are unwilling to name a state, we cannot help you further.
 
Originally posted by: Vinney
Um no. That an argument that I was preparing for a fake trial will probably not hold water.

Many jurisdictions have rules against making that argument - that a jury should choose a longer sentence due to parole considerations.
 
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
The federal prison system does not have parole, but most states do, and require you to serve 1/3 of the sentence.

1 for 3 is the way Texas works. I suspect that is the way most states handle it, too.
 
Correct me if im wrong, but I dont even think you are allowed to bring up sentencing in a trial?
 
Back
Top