hellokeith
Golden Member
Or students could just stop illegal downloading of copyrighted media.. nah, pass the bong bro.
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i thought we elected the democrats to stop this sort of crap
Whoa dude, O-Bama is not in just yet. He has to part the Red Sea first.
FTW...
The Dems have done nothing. Lowest approval rating ever, but everyone wants to elect another one...Good job, America, good job...
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Are colleges still havens for piracy? I thought most had started to clamp down on piracy with minimal pressure from RIAA/MPAA. As Scarpozzi pointed out, P2P eats a lot of bandwidth; colleges have a lot of incentive to snuff it out, especially if it's interfering with legitimate, academic uses of network resources.
Originally posted by: Bibble
Does this apply to all universities or just public schools?
EDIT: After doing some more research I think the title of this thread and article linked in the OP are misleading. Only a tiny section this large bill has anything to do with piracy and it basically says that schools who figure out a system to reduce it will get some grant money. This is far from forcing schools to act as "copyright police."
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i thought we elected the democrats to stop this sort of crap
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
That's a load of crap. P2P is already enemy #1 to college campuses. It eats bandwidth, which isn't cheap when you're supporting 5,000+ node networks....often not even counting student dorms. For P2P, you can't expect them to be stopped because of the way they work....you can only attempt to prevent them by port filtering, packetshaping, and throttling through QOS that would make their use so slow that no one would want to bother. You can only allow the network administrators and police to come in and waste tax dollars trying to catch those using them.
A lot of P2P systems aren't port dependent and that's how most traffic is filtered through PIX-like devices. If clients sharing music over port 80, 25, 110, etc...do they expect to shut down all HTTP traffic, SMTP, POP3, etc...?
Then you have companies using BitTorrent for legitimate uses and just because MP3s and AVIs exist doesn't mean they're not a legitimate backup...
If they expect to stop this stuff, they'd better outline EXACTLY what minimum steps the networks invovled are expected to take. That's the only way anyone will take it seriously.
and how much are you paid by the MPAA?
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i thought we elected the democrats to stop this sort of crap
Whoa dude, O-Bama is not in just yet. He has to part the Red Sea first.
FTW...
The Dems have done nothing. Lowest approval rating ever, but everyone wants to elect another one...Good job, America, good job...
I hear ya... why would anyone vote for McCain after 8 years of Bush?
edit: on topic, thanks to those who clarified how the bill actually reads.
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i thought we elected the democrats to stop this sort of crap
Whoa dude, O-Bama is not in just yet. He has to part the Red Sea first.
FTW...
The Dems have done nothing. Lowest approval rating ever, but everyone wants to elect another one...Good job, America, good job...