Law Enforecement

dudeguy

Banned
Aug 11, 2004
219
0
0
Let me pose this;

You have a known murderer, reasonable initial evidence, a crime scene, victim and weapon, and the suspect's know group of friends and the areas he frequents, how long should it take the police to track him down and arrest him?

What should happen to the investigative officer if he cant find him and cant get the associates to talk?

If the suspect isnt found and the investigation isnt seemingly progressing to a sucessful conclusion how long until its either shelved or another top investigator takes over?

Cheers, post answers below, and then Ill post further info.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: dudeguy
Let me pose this;

You have a known murderer, reasonable initial evidence, a crime scene, victim and weapon, and the suspect's know group of friends and the areas he frequents, how long should it take the police to track him down and arrest him?

What should happen to the investigative officer if he cant find him and cant get the associates to talk?

If the suspect isnt found and the investigation isnt seemingly progressing to a sucessful conclusion how long until its either shelved or another top investigator takes over?

Cheers, post answers below, and then Ill post further info.

Depends, not all situations are alike
 

jjzelinski

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2004
3,750
0
0
Originally posted by: dudeguy
Let me pose this;

You have a known murderer, reasonable initial evidence, a crime scene, victim and weapon, and the suspect's know group of friends and the areas he frequents, how long should it take the police to track him down and arrest him?

What should happen to the investigative officer if he cant find him and cant get the associates to talk?

If the suspect isnt found and the investigation isnt seemingly progressing to a sucessful conclusion how long until its either shelved or another top investigator takes over?

Cheers, post answers below, and then Ill post further info.

I somehow suspect this is a GW2 allusion...
 

dudeguy

Banned
Aug 11, 2004
219
0
0
Well Osama is still breathing fresh mountain air, three years on, so is Bush going to fired?
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Well Osama is still breathing fresh mountain air, three years on,

True dat. Laughing his ass off at us too. As well he should be, in the face of such an ineffectual response to his challenge. He kicked our ass and so far nothing has been done about it.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Well, iran says the US has him...

Wait till october ;)

Is it against international law to not disclose captives?
 

dudeguy

Banned
Aug 11, 2004
219
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Well, iran says the US has him...

Wait till october ;)

Is it against international law to not disclose captives?

they also say they have the "right" to nukes, lol!

If they had osama you would hear about it in minutes, like the kid bush showing the teacher he completed his pages of sums before everyone else. (except in this case everyone else would be on the next page by now).
 

viivo

Diamond Member
May 4, 2002
3,345
32
91
Originally posted by: dudeguy

If they had osama you would hear about it in minutes.

I don't subscribe to the tinfoil hat theory that Osama is 10 miles under the earth in Cheney's shadow government bunker, but if they did have him, logic dictates waiting until just before the election so as to make a stronger impact. Put him out now and people may forget about it in a few months.
 

jjzelinski

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2004
3,750
0
0
Unliekly, unplausible, and unwise. If, at the remotest extent of the imagination, they already captured Bin Laden I find it retarded that they would wait until OCtoboer to realease the information. To me it would just look too suspicious. "Hey check it out! We've been running around spreading our ideological message with guns and bombs and we STILL managed to catch this guy! Boy, what luck! Its taken like 70 months to find this guy, and what do ya know, we find him on the cusp of an election!"

I just don't see it as casting a positive light on Bush Inc.