• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lauren Sanchez

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
lara logan is nice, but i guess thats relative to the rest of the 60 minute crew, plus shes named lara and has a british accent😉
 
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."

sorry... she's ugly. i think she gets all the surgery to cover up what hides beneath the surface.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."

its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.
but an honest jackass
Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."
its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.
Dude, did you just call Barbara Walters hawt? 😛
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."

its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.

This seems like a complete non sequitur to me. When did I say news anchors weren't hired for their looks? This woman was certainly hired, and has had success, largely on the strength of her looks, which pretty much any non-cloistered-geek person would agree are far above average.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."

its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.

This seems like a complete non sequitur to me. When did I say news anchors weren't hired for their looks? This woman was certainly hired, and has had success, largely on the strength of her looks, which pretty much any non-cloistered-geek person would agree are far above average.

i'm saying judging isn't so bad because they are sold to us as a product.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
[
its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.

This seems like a complete non sequitur to me. When did I say news anchors weren't hired for their looks? This woman was certainly hired, and has had success, largely on the strength of her looks, which pretty much any non-cloistered-geek person would agree are far above average.

i'm saying judging isn't so bad because they are sold to us as a product.

I don't take exception to judging her looks, I take exception to the unilateral presumption that she's "ugly," when empirically (to the extent subjective tastes regarding appearance can be empirically determined) she just isn't. It's like saying the Chrysler building is ugly.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
[
its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.

This seems like a complete non sequitur to me. When did I say news anchors weren't hired for their looks? This woman was certainly hired, and has had success, largely on the strength of her looks, which pretty much any non-cloistered-geek person would agree are far above average.

i'm saying judging isn't so bad because they are sold to us as a product.

I don't take exception to judging her looks, I take exception to the unilateral presumption that she's "ugly," when empirically (to the extent subjective tastes regarding appearance can be empirically determined) she just isn't. It's like saying the Chrysler building is ugly.

no, it's like saying a mormon temple is ugly... if you think that mormonism is a crap religion and the temple is just a way to get people to bring people to their crap religion, then, yeah, the temple is ugly. the outside is designed as a facade for what's on the inside...

disclaimer: i'm not saying mormonism is a crap religion... i'm just using it as an example because some people feel that way.
 
Good looking woman, but the guy that says those are real is confused. Trust me, I know fake boobs. My wife has them, and many of her co-workers at her last job did as well, which I saw up close and personal.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: DonVito
She's gorgeous, even if she's not the most beautiful woman on earth. As far as I'm concerned anyone who'd call her "ugly" is a jackass.

but an honest jackass


Negative. I don't see this as honesty - I see it as a sad desire to make yourself feel better by critiquing people out of your own league. I think an honest response would be "she's not my type," not "she's ugly."

its one thing when its just about some random person. its another when its about a public figure that makes their money off their looks. don't even pretend anchors are hired for their brains.

This seems like a complete non sequitur to me. When did I say news anchors weren't hired for their looks? This woman was certainly hired, and has had success, largely on the strength of her looks, which pretty much any non-cloistered-geek person would agree are far above average.

what do non geek people know? their word is law when it comes to who is hot, and who is ugly. I mean who knows females better then geek who spend 90% of their time on the internet looking at pictures of females they'll never meet.

Maybe Fox hired her because she is ugly, that would be revolutionary, and maybe fox 11 has the most watched news broadcast in LA because she's ugly.

Hate to say it, but I don't know anyone who watches Fox news because of the in depth reporting. I won't sit her and argue with men who think she's ugly, because they are obviously living in a cyber world where pr0n females are who they judge every other woman by.

and to people sayin "she's had tons of pladtic surgery" what proof do you have about this? her lips look less fake then Angelina's (who looks fake to me, but her's aren't either) and some other silly sh!t...

I think that Mellisa chick is decent at best, I would never say she's "ugly" but I wouldn't give her the time of day. That's my preference.
 
Back
Top