Latest version of IomegaWare completely hosed my Windows 2000 install?

NOX

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
4,077
0
0
I?m not sure why, I?m speculating it had something to do with the USB drivers IomegaWare installed on my system for my USB Powered Zip 250.

After installing the IomegaWare drivers the system (IDE & USB) began to run slow, a significant slowdown in read/write speeds. It was strange because the IDE also slowed down (Highpoint RAID0).

So I restarted because I figured the system needed to be restarted after the drivers were installed. It rebooted and I was just about to inter the Win2k desktop, that?s when I encounter a blue screen. My first reaction was in disbelief, because I?ve honestly never seen a blue screen in Win2k in over two years (or more)! I tried a few more times (about 5-7) to get into Win2k.

I then tried using the F8 option; I went in via safe mode. When I finally got in I uninstalled Active Disk & some other Iomega application services, however I did not uninstall the Iomega drivers.

When I rebooted, I was able to get back into windows 2000 without any blue screens. Everything seemed ok, however I still knew something was wrong, things didn?t seem quite right, the system still felt slower, and very finicky. It seem to reject all my usual applications like Nero 5.5, PowerDVD etc?

Then without warning; the system restarted. When booting back up it would take my all the way to the windows 2000 logo screen, hang for about 2 minutes, then restart again. Again I tried via safe mode and everything, but nothing worked. Uninstalled the Iomega drivers this time, rebooted but same thing would happen when I tried to go in the normal way. I would be greeted with a blue screen and reboot about a second later.

So I decided I would need to reformat, to started from scratch. When I finally got win2k installed, and everything running, with the new install. I rebooted, and to my surprise, another blue screen. Again, I was in disbelief. So finally I said the HPT374 controller/drivers for my High Point RAID0 setup must have been affected some how. So I deleted the array, and redid it from starch. Installed windows again, and this time everything worked just fine. Ran some Sandra, and my scores were the same as my original install, before I installed IomegaWare.

To be totally honest the only reason why I installed IW in the first place was to have an Zip icon instead of a Win2k default HD icon, so my wife would get confused and click on my flash memory icon all the time.

I was thinking of installing the win2k drivers only, and not iomegaware, but I don?t have the balls to do it. I?m still trying to get over this little episode.
 

c0rv1d43

Senior member
Oct 1, 2001
737
0
0
Heh-heh. Yes. Iomegaware is so bad they should distribute it with a box of bandages. I warn everyone I know to stay far away from it. It belongs in the hall of shame right next to the Roxio stuff.

It's really hilarious that the software package is so big, though it's smaller than it used to be. All you get are some really dumb apps and the stupid little icons.

Doesn't Win2K stick a different icon on an Iomega drive anyway? I forget because it's been a while since I've used an Iomega drive with Win2K. I do use one with a couple of WinXP systems, and they definitely assign a different icon.

You have my sympathy. (And don't be tempted to install the drivers. Unless memory fails me, you just don't need them in Win2K. That's certainly true of WinXP.)

- Collin
 

NOX

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
4,077
0
0
Hehe... (though I wans't laughing the other night).

Win2k uses a standard icon, however I can NOW live with that, because there is no way in hell will I go through that again!
 

c0rv1d43

Senior member
Oct 1, 2001
737
0
0
I have a sandbox WinXP system that I might decide to reconfigure for a special project. If I do go that way I might try an IomegaWare install on it just before wiping the system just to see what happens. System Restore has, so far, managed to save the bacon on that PC following some amazingly nasty installation procedures and attempts at testing-to-destruction. ;)

Actually, for all I know, the Iomega stuff might be okay in WinXP, but I won't be using it even if it works okay on the sandbox machine. I just didn't see anything in it that I needed or particularly wanted. (Okay, so there might be uses for the write-protect thingy.) My own experience with it under Win2K wasn't as bad as yours, but it certainly required me to remove it from my Win2K Pro system with a Brillo pad. And I've heard and read of so many other cases that I just can't believe they keep offering it. It's like the Adaptec/Roxio stuff. There should be villagers with torches chasing after it. "Run, everyone! It's ALIVE!!!"

:D

- Collin