• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Latest Cover Of GQ - Soft Porn?? (NSFW)

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Is this 'soft porn'?

  • Nope,...

  • Yup,...

  • I just want to JUMP ON HER!! AND CLIMB ALL OVER HER!! UNDRESS HER WITH MY TEETH!

  • I am a raging moron

Results are only viewable after voting.
lupi said:
not quite sure why a parent complaining over this is a bad thing.
Click to expand...

because our country generates a never-ending hoard of perverts and sexual deviants due to this sexually repressed asshole puritan parents.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the human body. You don't have shove it in your kid's faces, but nothing wrong with them being exposed to the human body. It's natural.
 
LightPattern said:
Her thumb in the front of her bikini bottom...
I think it'd be funny if it was her fingers.. with her thumb hooked around the outside. =D

If it was a dude, wearing just a speedo and a garland, in the same pose there would be no outrage. This is just a continuation of women in the western world becoming the same as the men. Ideas that a woman should act like a lady are antiquated, not our culture anymore.
Click to expand...

Sadly, that same lady would have a problem if a guy in a speedo was shown especially if his package was outlined prominently.

I don't have a problem with a topless woman, however; saying it's the same reaction as a man's chest is not true. Men and women are wired a bit differently there. You don't have women staring at every built guy's chest. 🙂
 
alkemyst said:
I don't have a problem with a topless woman, however; saying it's the same reaction as a man's chest is not true. Men and women are wired a bit differently there. You don't have women staring at every built guy's chest. 🙂
Click to expand...

yeah, women actually like that. and they stare. and they talk about it. not much different from men.
 
Good photo and probably photoshopping. I'm even a small boob fan, but that's pretty hot, and no, not porn-like. I can't even see nips in that photo, so what's the big deal? SI has had covers with more visible, IIRC.
 
Whup dee doo, some obese hippo of a bitch complaining about a hot chick fat-shaming her while she stuffs her face full of tacos. F fatties
 
Presumably the kids who may see this have access to the internet not to mention all the chat stuff that now goes on. Yet it's "think of the children" when some boobage (sans nipples) shows up in the mail of there is a nip slip on TV.
 
Slew Foot said:
Whup dee doo, some obese hippo of a bitch complaining about a hot chick fat-shaming her while she stuffs her face full of tacos. F fatties
Click to expand...

Secretly, the hippo bitch wants to be fat-shamed so that she has an excuse for knocking back a full gallon of ice cream as comfort food.

That being said, that cover is over the line by the ridiculously puritanical standards of the USA (Unending Shame of Anatomy). And that's why GQ did it. They knew it would get a rise out of the ultra-conservatives who would get their panties in a completely non-visible bunch and it would generate free publicity for the issue.
 
Exterous said:
Its more because many of work at places where viewing NSFW type images can get us in trouble than having us be exposed to the human form. Since I used to work at a place where that image would have gotten me in trouble I appropriate their caution
Click to expand...

Any work place which condones accessing forums or chatrooms at work while having hissy fits over scantily clad women or men is rather two faced. And don't tell me about customers seeing monitors being unprofessional. FB is more professional than the GQ cover? Hypocritical forum and corporate drones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top