• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Latest attacks in Republicans' War on women

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If Germans still did to Jewish people what our government, specifically the right, is again trying to do to Native Americans we would be at war with them again....or imposing sanctions on them at the very least.

This is an appaling move by the right and just shows how far removed from common sense and decency these people really are.

Whoever said that facism will come to America wrapped in a flag and holding a Bible was right. This is absurd.

Are you claiming that refusing to pass a law that extends government power is fascism?
 
Are you claiming that refusing to pass a law that extends government power is fascism?

I am claiming that repealing rights we have already given to women based on their ethnicity is racist and facist. You DO realize that Native American women are discriminated against directly by this, right? I, for one, find that disgusting that so many of you are willing to support that given what their people have been through and speaks volumes about your lack of moral fiber.
 
I am claiming that repealing rights we have already given to women based on their ethnicity is racist and facist. You DO realize that Native American women are discriminated against directly by this, right? I, for one, find that disgusting that so many of you are willing to support that given what their people have been through and speaks volumes about your lack of moral fiber.

You do realize that the Democrats bill denies men the right to defend themselves against claims of domestic violence right? Oh and by the way even now 1/3 of this claims are dismissed as fraudulent, but somehow this is evidence that fraud is not an issue :\

And I find it funny that you are complaining about a bill that is discriminatory by its very name being discriminatory :\
 
You do realize that the Democrats bill denies men the right to defend themselves against claims of domestic violence right? Oh and by the way even now 1/3 of this claims are dismissed as fraudulent, but somehow this is evidence that fraud is not an issue :\

And I find it funny that you are complaining about a bill that is discriminatory by its very name being discriminatory :\

As a man who was a victim of domestic abuse I can assure you that any man can reverse that situation almost immediately. If you cannot then you need to go work out instead of trying to twist this stuff to fit into your warped agenda. It is discriminatory because men are physically stronger than women and WAY more likely to be the abuser than the abusee.

As for the fraud, well hopefully they will keep determining who is committing fraud and prosecute them.
 
As a man who was a victim of domestic abuse I can assure you that any man can reverse that situation almost immediately. If you cannot then you need to go work out instead of trying to twist this stuff to fit into your warped agenda.

😵 You were a victim of domestic and you are apologizing for women who commit domestic violence 😵

Oh and there is a little problem that by "reverse that situation" I am thinking you mean use force of your own... but then you are "abusive".

It is discriminatory because men are physically stronger than women and WAY more likely to be the abuser than the abusee.

Oh really... http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800
 
I'm not apologizing for anything, I am just stating that I could have turned the situation around anytime and she eventually WAS arrested and served months for assaulting me.

I really don't appreciate you trying to swerve my personal experience into your agenda, first of all.

Secondly, if someone is attacking me and I grab them and pin them to the ground without too much force (which is easy to do with a woman) then not only have I reversed the situation, which is easy enough for any man to do, but I have also kept myself from any assault charges by not being overly aggressive in my response.

Finally, you are sitting here stating statistics of female abuse to a victim of female abuse which not only serves no purpose at all but also shows how far down the evolutionary ladder you really are. You're a fucking scumbag and I would glady take a vacation to tell you so. Fuck you for turning my personal experience into a platform for your bullshit.

Do us all a favor and kill yourself already.
 
The statement that men are "way more likely" to be the abuser is questionable, but women who're victims of domestic violence are much more likely to end up dead.
 
The statement that men are "way more likely" to be the abuser is questionable, but women who're victims of domestic violence are much more likely to end up dead.

http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

Mercy, J. A., & Saltzman, L. E. (1989). Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1975-85. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 595-599. (Examined FBI figures regarding spousal homicides. During the 10 year period from 1975 to 1985 found higher murder rates of wives than husbands <43.4% vs 56.6%>. Black husbands were at the greatest risk of victimization. Spousal homicide among blacks was 8.4 times higher than that of whites. Spouse homicide rates were 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages and the risk of victimization for both whites and blacks increased as age differences between spouses increased. Wives and husbands were equally likely to be killed by firearms <approximately 72% of the time> while husbands were more likely to be stabbed and wives more likely to bludgeoned to death. Arguments apparently escalated to murder in 67% of spouse homicides.)

56.4 vs 43.3... I think "Way more likely" is an exaggeration.
 
I'm not apologizing for anything, I am just stating that I could have turned the situation around anytime and she eventually WAS arrested and served months for assaulting me.

I really don't appreciate you trying to swerve my personal experience into your agenda, first of all.

Secondly, if someone is attacking me and I grab them and pin them to the ground without too much force (which is easy to do with a woman) then not only have I reversed the situation, which is easy enough for any man to do, but I have also kept myself from any assault charges by not being overly aggressive in my response.

Finally, you are sitting here stating statistics of female abuse to a victim of female abuse which not only serves no purpose at all but also shows how far down the evolutionary ladder you really are. You're a fucking scumbag and I would glady take a vacation to tell you so. Fuck you for turning my personal experience into a platform for your bullshit.

Do us all a favor and kill yourself already.

LOL... YOU brought your personal experience in here and used it as your platform, then get your panties in a twist when someone else uses it too? 🙄
 
Please list some Republican's in Congress who are "Conservative" so I can write them down for future reference. 😉

Most of the Republicans arent Conservative, they are Neo-Cons, Progessives and big government Republicans. The only real conservatives are Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Jim DeMint who is very conservative and not much more
 
So the answer to domestic violence isn't legal protection, but working out? Then why is Prodigy getting so cranky about repealing this legislation? Those women should just work out.

Also, I find it interesting that he's claiming how easy it is for a man to subdue a women, while many of his "liberal" brethren would argue that women shouldn't have the right to carry a gun for protection. They'll just have to get beaten and raped and like it. Or they can work out...

Yep, the "liberal" mind is a confusing mess...
 
So the answer to domestic violence isn't legal protection, but working out? Then why is Prodigy getting so cranky about repealing this legislation? Those women should just work out.

Also, I find it interesting that he's claiming how easy it is for a man to subdue a women, while many of his "liberal" brethren would argue that women shouldn't have the right to carry a gun for protection. They'll just have to get beaten and raped and like it. Or they can work out...

Yep, the "liberal" mind is a confusing mess...

You forgot how statistics and his personal experience both say that women are abusive... therefore we need laws to protect women from abuse. 😵
 
You forgot how statistics and his personal experience both say that women are abusive... therefore we need laws to protect women from abuse. 😵

Women are physically incapable of stopping it without using excessive violence, as I have stated numerous times, but you just have to be hip and edgy and act as though all people are created equal when women are physically incapable of being stronger than even the smallest and thinnest of full grown men. Mark Zuckerburg could kick the shit out of 99% of the women on this planet but you idiots keep acting like it's somehow a level playing field.

LOL... YOU brought your personal experience in here and used it as your platform, then get your panties in a twist when someone else uses it too? 🙄

You guys keep acting like a woman could physically assault you and you can't do anything about it as I have said many times. Yes I am going to get pissed off when you tell me I am an abuser for protecting myself, so yeah fuck you too dumbass.

So the answer to domestic violence isn't legal protection, but working out? Then why is Prodigy getting so cranky about repealing this legislation? Those women should just work out.

Also, I find it interesting that he's claiming how easy it is for a man to subdue a women, while many of his "liberal" brethren would argue that women shouldn't have the right to carry a gun for protection. They'll just have to get beaten and raped and like it. Or they can work out...

Yep, the "liberal" mind is a confusing mess...

Keep twisting in the wind with your ridiculous posts. Am I a liberal, really? But hey, whatever works for your agenda and your idiotic rhetoric, right?
 
Last edited:
You guys keep acting like a woman could physically assault you and you can't do anything about it as I have said many times. Yes I am going to get pissed off when you tell me I am an abuser for protecting myself, so yeah fuck you too dumbass.

Well now that's something you should tell my brother in law. He was married to a physically abusive woman and she once knocked him out with a butcher block. He didn't call the police directly but a friend who was on the force. He asked if there were witnesses to the crime and he said no. He strongly advised him to not call officially because his wife will contend that she was defending himself and in the eyes of the court he is guilty unless he can prove otherwise. The best case is that wouldn't be prosecuted or sued by her.

That's very common. The assumption in disputes in many cases is that the man is guilty. Statistics shown demonstrate that the woman is often the one who initiates violence, yet the contention is that the man is the one who is to blame. That does not excuse anything if it's true, but there is a very real obstacle to justice when the real world requires the demonstration of innocence on the part of a person, not proof of guilt. r
 
Women are physically incapable of stopping it without using excessive violence, as I have stated numerous times, but you just have to be hip and edgy and act as though all people are created equal when women are physically incapable of being stronger than even the smallest and thinnest of full grown men.

So in your view women are inferior to men? :hmm: Somehow I think the Democratic establishment might object to that view.

Mark Zuckerburg could kick the shit out of 99% of the women on this planet but you idiots keep acting like it's somehow a level playing field.

I think you are exasperating on the number. But the problem is if you kick the shit out of a woman who is abusing you what do you think will happen...

Well now that's something you should tell my brother in law. He was married to a physically abusive woman and she once knocked him out with a butcher block. He didn't call the police directly but a friend who was on the force. He asked if there were witnesses to the crime and he said no. He strongly advised him to not call officially because his wife will contend that she was defending himself and in the eyes of the court he is guilty unless he can prove otherwise. The best case is that wouldn't be prosecuted or sued by her.

That's very common. The assumption in disputes in many cases is that the man is guilty. Statistics shown demonstrate that the woman is often the one who initiates violence, yet the contention is that the man is the one who is to blame. That does not excuse anything if it's true, but there is a very real obstacle to justice when the real world requires the demonstration of innocence on the part of a person, not proof of guilt. r

So, not only do you have to be stronger than the woman, you have to be so much stronger than the woman that you can restrain her without it looking like you abused her.
 
Back
Top