• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Last version of Firefox that supported Win95?

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
I dug out an ancient laptop, 8MB (yes, not GB, MB) of RAM, monochrome screen, 386SX (I think) CPU, Win95. Only drive on the laptop is a floppy drive. No USB ports. Thankfully, I have a 16-bit PC Card 10Mbit ethernet dongle. So I can get on the internet with it if I want to. IE version is 3.02.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
You'll never get it to run anything remotely recent with only 8M total of memory. You could try something tiny like QNX but I doubt even that would be very useful.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,072
10,554
126
Microcore Linux requires 36mb ram. I'm surprised Win95 will run on that.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,592
13,808
126
www.anyf.ca
If I recall Windows 98 required 32MB of ram, so I could see Win95 running on that, but that's BARE requirements most likely. I remember installing windows 98 on a 486 for fun. It was a 3 hour install, and once you were in, if you clicked on the start menu or anything it would take about half an hour to get a reaction.

I'm guessing it will be similar having win95 on that machine.

See if you can find a copy of win 3.11. That would be totally retro. :D
 

Steltek

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,345
1,086
136
If I recall Windows 98 required 32MB of ram, so I could see Win95 running on that, but that's BARE requirements most likely. I remember installing windows 98 on a 486 for fun. It was a 3 hour install, and once you were in, if you clicked on the start menu or anything it would take about half an hour to get a reaction.

I'm guessing it will be similar having win95 on that machine.

See if you can find a copy of win 3.11. That would be totally retro. :D

Shockingly enough, Windows 3.11 is still available to Technet subscribers if you can believe it.....
 

shabby

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,782
45
91
Sadly, even Win95 is too much for that machine.

Not really, win95 can run even with 4mb of ram. The cpu might be a bit slow but im sure the responsiveness will be similar to running vista on an atom netbook.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Not really, win95 can run even with 4mb of ram. The cpu might be a bit slow but im sure the responsiveness will be similar to running vista on an atom netbook.

I.e. painful enough that you shouldn't even attempt it.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Not really, win95 can run even with 4mb of ram. The cpu might be a bit slow but im sure the responsiveness will be similar to running vista on an atom netbook.

No. Vista on a netbook runs about the same as windows XP on a netbook. Unless it's bogged down with stupid browser bars and startup apps it runs fine. A base OS install is snappy, even. Neither runs nearly as slow as windows 95 on 4mb of RAM.
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
I remember Windows 95 on 8MB RAM and a 486DX2 66MHz CPU (or at least I think that's what the CPU was). Do not attempt. I remember opening a ~50KB JPEG off your hard drive would take between 30-45 seconds before IE 2.x would launch and display the image.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,072
10,554
126
Why would you torture yourself and try to use this thing?

Your user name is appropriate. You'd be praying for death while waiting for a 386 to load a web page :^D

Seriously though,, a 386 is a pre internet machine by any reasonable standard. The internet didn't exist any meaningful, end user way. Back then it was used to transmit text information between geeks. The best use for that box would be running old DOS games, and as an amusing conversation piece. If you really want internet, Lynx, or something similar would be the best bet.
 

swinger222

Member
Jun 3, 2005
111
0
71
There aren't many websites you'd be able to browse with that thing! I doubt Firefox 1.5 will run smoothly anyways.
Pics?
It'd be a cute thing to mod or put on display somewhere IMO.