DucatiMonster696
Diamond Member
- Aug 13, 2009
- 4,269
- 1
- 71
There is a big flaw in your analysis. Government will never let the government employee unions lose their Cadillac plans.
Fixed for improved accuracy.
There is a big flaw in your analysis. Government will never let the government employee unions lose their Cadillac plans.
Fixed for improved accuracy.
Yep, then the Reps will win supermajorities in both Houses and the White House for the next several decades. Think of it, all the policies you "love" come to fruition and the SCOTUS filled with Republican loyalists for the next two generations.
Be careful what you ask for because you just might get it.
Shit, what do you think I am 12 like the rest of the silver spoon republicans in here?
so what is stopping these companies from doing this now?
The dems have a huge majority and they still didn't pass government health care. It seems more likely this problem is accidental and the dems just don't know wtf they are doing.Which is exactly what the Dems wanted all along.
Maybe they'll just close down and move the factory to Canada where companies don't need to deal with this health care bullshit. :awe:If this happens you'll see union membership go sky high.
Maybe you arent, but shareholders are.
Nope. I'm saying that if it happens that working people who have had insurance find it gone due to changes in regulation, then what I suggested will happen.
so what is stopping these companies from doing this now?
anyone?
The extra $20 million (assuming Caterpillar is even correct) is fully deductible by Caterpillar on both its state and federal returns. The average state corporate tax rate is about 7%, and the federal rate is 35% (for large-incomes). Thus, the total rate is about 40%. So that $20 million ends up being about $12 million, or about 1 quarter of one percent of earnings. Caterpillar is currently paying dividends of $1.68/share. So the net effect of that $12 million loss in income would be 0.4 cents a share.
Somehow, I think the shareholders are yawning.
Hahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahaha
Maybe you arent, but shareholders are.
so what is stopping these companies from doing this now?
Maybe you arent, but shareholders are.
Gee more faux outrage for shit that won't happen
Sure large companies want to save a buck but their not fucking stupid. Anyone with half a brain knows the second a company does this effectively dealing a huge paycut to employees, that said employees will bail in massive numbers.
Get back to me when a large company actually tries this. Ain't gonna happen
Maybe you arent, but shareholders are.
but but but shareholders are evil.
The evil shareholders are ruining the plan because they want to make a profit.
There is only one solution to this problem....
When I first read your post I thought of drugs (bennies - I grew up in the 60's and 70's).Then I thought of the old Bell telco "green pills". They had 400mg of aspirin, 200mg of caffeine and 1mg of valium. In the old days your supervisor would give them to you if you were feeling sick or having your period. They will probably start it up again if big companies drop healthcare. "Here you go, employee. Here is your healthcare. Now keep working."
![]()
So much for "if you like your insurance you can keep it". No doubt individuals will also pay fines instead of buying insurance since with no pre-existings excluded people will buy insurance when needed.
"The great mystery surrounding the historic health care bill is how the corporations that provide coverage for most Americans -- coverage they know and prize -- will react to the new law's radically different regime of subsidies, penalties, and taxes. Now, we're getting a remarkable inside look at the options AT&T, Deere, and other big companies are weighing to deal with the new legislation.Internal documents recently reviewed by Fortune, originally requested by Congress, show what the bill's critics predicted, and what its champions dreaded: many large companies are examining a course that was heretofore unthinkable, dumping the health care coverage they provide to their workers in exchange for paying penalty fees to the government."
http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/05/news/companies/dropping_benefits.fortune/index.htm?cnn=yes&hpt=C2
in this economy, the companies will benefit by the exodus.
You realize this right?
We are being setup for the biggest shell game in history.
On the other hand, if Caterpillar pulled the rug on its health benefits, employees jumped ship, and they had to spend a huge amount of money on severance/recruiting to bring in replacement employees that do not have the skill or experience of their original people, I bet the shareholders would be pretty pissed about that.
Oh please
Jumped ship? Where would these people go?
Severance? We're not talking about the CEO here.![]()
The extra $20 million (assuming Caterpillar is even correct) is fully deductible by Caterpillar on both its state and federal returns. The average state corporate tax rate is about 7%, and the federal rate is 35% (for large-incomes). Thus, the total rate is about 40%. So that $20 million ends up being about $12 million, or about 1 quarter of one percent of earnings. Caterpillar is currently paying dividends of $1.68/share. So the net effect of that $12 million loss in income would be 0.4 cents a share.
Somehow, I think the shareholders are yawning.
Riiiiight, because severance is only reserved for CEOs.
Every company I have ever worked for had severance packages for laid off employees.
so what is stopping these companies from doing this now?
anyone?
nobody eh?
fear doom fear indeed
